Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;12(10):619. doi: 10.3390/toxins12100619

Table 5.

Modulation of the intestinal chemical barrier induced by mycotoxins.

Model Dose/Administration Route Exposure Time Technique Damage References
Aflatoxin
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells AFM1: 0.05, 4 μg/mL 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Change the mRNA and protein expression level of MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC 5B in different proportions of co-cultured cells [43]
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells AFM1: 12 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
No effect on the mRNA and protein expression level of MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC 5B [57]
Broiler chicks (Ross 308, n = 336) AFs (AFB1+AFB2+AFG1+AFG2) 0.5 and 2 mg/kg feed
Contaminated feed
28, 42 days Histological analysis Increase in the goblet cell counts at 28 and 42 d [104]
Broiler chicks (Ross 308, n = 336) AFs (AFB1+AFB2+AFG1+AFG2) 0.5 and 2 ppm feed
Contaminated feed
28, 42 days Histological analysis Increase in the goblet cell counts at 28 and 42 d [132]
Hens (Hyline W36, n = 64) AFB1: 0.5–2.0 mg/kg 14 days Histological analysis No changes in goblet cell number and crude mucin production [133]
Ochratoxin A
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells OTA: 0.05, 4 μg/mL 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Modulate the mRNA level of MUC2, MUC5AC and MUC 5B,
Increase in the protein expression of MUC2 and MUC5B at low concentration, while decrease at high concentration
[43]
Broiler chickens (n = 80) OTA: 50 μg/kg b.w.
Oral administration
21 days Histological analysis Decrease in goblet cells number in the small intestine [107]
Deoxynivalenol
HT29-16E cells DON: 0.1–100 μM 3–48 h RT-PCR Decrease in the transcript level of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC3 [134]
Cao-2 cells DON: 2 μM 5 min–24 h RT-PCR Increase in the transcript level of MUC5AC [135]
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells DON: 2 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Decrease in the transcript level of MUC5AC and MUC5B in the 90:10 ratio [136]
IPEC-J2 cells DON: 2 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Increase in the transcript level of β-defensin1 and β-defensin2, while no effect on protein expression [137]
porcine intestinal explants DON: 10 μM 8, 12 h RT-PCR Decrease in the transcript level of MUC1, MUC2 and MUC3 [134]
Fish (juvenile grass carp, n = 1440) DON: 318–1515 μg/kg diet
Contaminated feed
60 days RT-PCR Decrease in the mRNA expression of MUC2 and AMPs (β-defensin1, hepcidin, LEAP-2A and LEAP-2B) in proximal, middle and distal intestine [138]
Broiler Chickens (Ross 308, n = 112) DON: 4.6 mg/kg feed
Contaminated feed
15 days RT-PCR Decrease in the mRNA expression of MUC2 in duodenum [139]
Mice (BALB/c, n = 42) DON: 3.0 mg/kg
Gavage
15 days RT-PCR Decrease in the mRNA expression of MUC2 [140]
Mice (C57BL/6, n = 72) DON: 2 mg/kg b.w.
Oral administration
1–12 days Immunohistochemistry staining Decrease in the MUC2+ cells and LYZ+ cells number in jejunum [110]
Mice (C57BL/6, n = 72) DON: 2 mg/kg b.w.
Oral administration
14 days Immunohistochemistry staining Decrease in the MUC2+ cells and LYZ+ cells number in jejunum [111]
Pig (piglet, n = 24) DON: 3.0 mg/kg
Contaminated feed
35 days Histological analysis Decrease in the goblet cells number in jejunum and ileum [121]
Pig (piglet, n = 20) DON: 1.5 mg/kg
Contaminated feed
28 days Histological analysis Decrease in the number of goblet cells in jejunum and ileum [115]
Mice (BALB/c, n = 42) DON: 3.0 mg/kg
Gavage
15 days Histological analysis Decrease in the goblet cells number [140]
Pig (piglet, n = 24) DON: 50 μg/kg b.w.
Contaminated feed
15 days Histological analysis Decrease in the goblet cells number in villi, but no effects at crypts level [112]
Pig (growing pigs, n = 24) DON: 3, 6, 12 mg/kg feed
Contaminated feed
21 days Histological analysis Decrease in the goblet cells number of jejunum of pigs fed with diets 6 mg/kg DON-contaminated [141]
Pig (gilt, n = 72) DON: 12 μg/kg b.w.
Contaminated feed
7–42 days Histological analysis No effect on the goblet cells number of duodenum [142]
Zearalenone
Cao-2 cells ZEN: 40 μM 5 min–24 h RT-PCR Decrease in the mRNA expression of MUC5AC [135]
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells ZEN: 40 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Decrease in the transcript level of MUC5AC [136]
IPEC-J2 cells ZEN: 40 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Increase in the transcript level of β-defensin1 and β-defensin2, while no effect on protein expression [137]
Pig (gilt, n = 72) ZEN: 40 μg/kg b.w.
Contaminated feed
7–42 days Histological analysis No effect on the goblet cells number of duodenum [142]
Fumonisin B1
IPEC-J2 cells FB1: 40 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Increase in the mRNA expression of β-defensin1 and β-defensin2, while no effect on protein expression [137]
Pig (piglet, n = 24) DON: 6.0 mg/kg
Contaminated feed
35 days Histological analysis Inductive effect on goblet cell in jejunum [121]
T-2 toxin
HT-29 cells
Cao-2 cells
T-2: 50–100 ng/mL 24 h Immunofluorescence staining,
Western blot analysis
Decrease in the mucus layer in Caco-2 cells and HT-29 cells
Decrease the protein expression of MUC2
[124]
Chickens (n = 20) T-2: 145 μg/kg diet
Contaminated feed
14 days RT-PCR Increase MUC2 mRNA expression level in jejunum [143]
Nivalenol
Cao-2/HT29-MTX cells NIV: 2 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Decrease in the mRNA expression of MUC5AC and MUC5B in the 90:10 ratio [136]
IPEC-J2 cells NIV: 2 μM 48 h RT-PCR,
ELISA
Increase in the transcript level of β-defensin1 and β-defensin2, while no effect on protein expression [137]