Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 3;9(10):667. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9100667

Table 2.

Summary of antibiofilm activities of promising antibiofilm agents against biofilm producing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various sources.

Antibiofilm Activities Promising MRSA Isolates Sources (No.)
Antibiofilm Agents Human (32) Animal (17) Food (11)
Reduction percentage of biofilm capacity *
(Phenotypically, MTP method)
ZnO NPs 99.79 ± 0.089 99.81 ± 0.088 99.58 ± 0.016
HAM 99.58 ± 0.072 99.81 ± 0.007 99.58 ± 0.016
Proteinase K 99.51 ± 0.065 99.28 ± 0.013 99.44 ± 0.004
Fold changes of biofilm and QS genes expressions icaA ZnO NPs 0.28 ± 0.042 0.18 ± 0.027 0.15 ± 0.020
HAM 0.40 ± 0.042 0.32 ± 0.027 0.45 ± 0.020
Proteinase K 0.81 ± 0.045 0.55 ± 0.027 0.69 ± 0.020
agr ZnO NPs 0.08 ± 0.042 0.40 ± 0.025 0.48 ± 0.020
HAM 0.22 ± 0.042 0.60 ± 0.027 0.59 ± 0.020
Proteinase K 0.59 ± 0.032 0.71 ± 0.027 0.82 ± 0.020

MTP: microtiter plate; QS: quorum sensing; icaA: intercellular adhesion A gene; agr: accessory gene regulator; ZnO NPs: zinc oxide nanoparticles; HAM: hamamelitannin; MRSA: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. All data represent the mean values ± standard deviation for all analyzed biofilm producing MRSA isolates.