Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 9;12(10):2902. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102902

Table 3.

Statistics of univariate analyses of clinicopathological parameters, Immunogradient and intratumoral immune cell density indicators for patient overall survival.

Clinicopathological Parameters, Immunogradient and Intratumoral Cell Density Indicators CRC, n = 87
HR 95% CI p-Value *
Age group (>median vs. ≤median) 1.33 0.64–2.77 0.4480
Sex (male vs. female) 0.84 0.40–1.77 0.6481
TNM stage (III-IV vs. I-II) 1.06 0.49–2.30 0.8825
pT status (pT4 vs. pT2-3) 1.05 0.45–2.46 0.9151
pN status (pN1-2 vs. pN0) 0.98 0.45–2.18 0.9683
M status (M1 vs. M0) 3.41 0.80–14.60 0.0978
G stage (G3 vs. G2) 1.60 0.74–3.46 0.2312
LVI status (LVI1 vs. LVI0) 1.77 0.56–2.43 0.6737
Pne status (Pne1 vs. Pne0) 1.67 0.68–4.12 0.2648
Tumor location (right/transverse/multiple vs. left) 2.00 0.85–4.68 0.1128
Tumor growth pattern (infiltrative vs. pushing margin) 2.81 1.32–5.98 0.0075 *
Tumor budding (high vs. low) 2.05 0.98–4.29 0.0556
Peritumoral lymphocytes (inconspicuous vs. conspicuous) 1.28 0.61–2.69 0.5234
MSI status (MSI vs. MSS) 2.07 0.97–4.43 0.0614
BRAF status (mutant vs. wild-type) 0.98 0.44–2.18 0.9501
KRAS status (mutant vs. wild-type) 0.78 0.36–1.72 0.5369
PIK3CA status (mutant vs. wild-type) 0.59 0.21–1.70 0.3264
CD8_CM (high vs. low) 0.31 0.15–0.66 0.0013 *
CD8_d_S (high vs. low) 1.46 0.64–3.31 0.3600
CD8_d_TE (high vs. low) 0.64 0.31–1.35 0.2400
CD8_d_T (high vs. low) 0.53 0.25–1.10 0.0850
INT_CD8 (high vs. low) 2.13 0.93–4.88 0.0670
CD20_CM (high vs. low) 0.39 0.16–0.91 0.0230 *
CD20_d_S (high vs. low) 0.30 0.12–0.75 0.0061 *
CD20_d_TE (high vs. low) 0.33 0.10–1.08 0.0530
CD20_d_T (high vs. low) 0.43 0.20–0.90 0.0210 *
INT_CD20 (high vs. low) 0.41 0.18–0.90 0.0230 *
CD68_CM (high vs. low) 1.77 0.84–3.74 0.1300
CD68_d_S (high vs. low) 0.59 0.28–1.23 0.1500
CD68_d_TE (high vs. low) 0.65 0.30–1.43 0.2800
CD68_d_T (high vs. low) 1.82 0.77–4.26 0.1600
INT_CD68 (high vs. low) 1.73 0.79–3.81 0.1700

HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval. * p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.