Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 28;9(10):648. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9100648

Table 3.

Comparison between hydrogel and aerogel in wound healing applications.

Functionality Hydrogels Aerogels Reference
Fluids absorption in wet wounds Does not absorb fluids and cannot be used in wet wounds. Able to absorb large amounts of fluids in wet wounds. [145,146]
Stop hemorrhage Not applicable. Can be used to absorb fluid and expand to fill the wound. [147]
Mechanical stability Poor mechanical strength and liable to tearing easily. Excellent mechanical strength and easy to handle. [148]
Wounds aeration Does not provide aeration to wounds. The high porosity of aerogels provides suitable aeration for wounds. [149]
Potential cytotoxicity Relatively higher Lower cytotoxicity. [150]
Reliability for patients Difficult for patients to change their dressings. Easy for patients to change their dressings. [151]
Cost of production Lower cost of production. Higher cost of production. [152]