Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 27;12(10):2767. doi: 10.3390/cancers12102767

Table 1.

Summary of potential non-invasive biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer.

Sources Types Biomarkers Measured Detection Types (Sample Size) Sensitivity Specificity Notes References
Peripheral blood Circulating carcinoma proteins serum proteins: CEA, FASL, OPN, VEGFC, VEGFD, HGF. breast cancer (100) vs. non-breast cancer subjects (110). 74.7%. 77.0%. AUC*: 0.79. [15]
tumor-associated autoantibodies: FRS3, RAC3, HOXD1, GPR157, ZMYM6, EIF3E, CSNK1E, ZNF510, BMX, SF3A1, SOX2 breast cancer (100) vs. non-breast cancer subjects (110) 72.2% 70.8% AUC: 0.77
serum proteins and tumor-associated autoantibodies: FASL, IL6, IL8, OPN, VEGFD, HGF, FRS3, MYOZ2, RAC3GPR157, ZMYM6, EIF3E, CSNK1E, ZNF510, BMXSF3A1, SOX2 breast cancer (100) vs. non-breast cancer subjects (110) 81.0% 78.8% AUC: 0.89
Videssa Breast consisting of serum proteins: AFP, CA19-9, CEA, TNF-α, VEGF-C, ErbB2 (HER2); and tumor-associated autoantibodies: ANXA1, ATF3, ATP6AP1, BAT4 (GPANK1), BDNF, CTBP1, DBT, HOXD1, IGF2BP1, IGFBP2, ErbB2 (HER2) women aged 25–75 (1145) 93.0% 64.0% negative predictive value: 98.0% [16]
Videssa Breast consisting of 11 serum protein biomarkers and 33 tumor-associated autoantibodies women aged under 50 years (545): Breast cancer (32) vs. benign breast tumor (513) 87.5% 83.8% negative predictive value: 99.1% [17]
Circulating tumor cells CellSearch® system metastatic breast cancer (55) 47% N/A overall positive agreement for both assays: 73% (CTC ≥ 2) and 69% (CTC ≥ 5) [18]
AdnaTest® assay metastatic breast cancer (55) 53% N/A
Circulating cell-free tumor DNA ctDNA concentrations (≥0.75%) colorectal and breast cancer patients (10) vs. healthy subjects (10) >90.0% >99.0% [19]
ctDNA levels (amplifiable per ml of plasma) with CA15-3 expression level breast cancer (27) 96.0% N/A [20]
ctDNA levels with CTC numbers breast cancer (30) 97.0% N/A
ctDNA levels with PIK3CA E545K and H1047R mutations early-stage breast cancer (29) 93.3% 100.0% accuracy: 96.7% [21]
SCGB3A1 DNA methylation in cfDNA breast cancer (108) vs. female asymptomatic controls (103) 16.8% 80.0% accuracy: 53.0% [22,23]
methylation patterns of six genes in cfDNA: SFN, P16, hMLH1, HOXD13, PCDHGB7, and RASSF1a breast cancer (125) vs. healthy subjects (104) 79.6% 72.4% AUC: 0.727 [24]
methylation analysis of a panel of 16 genes:
12 novel epigenetic markers: JAK3, RASGRF1, CPXM1, SHF, DNM3, CAV2, HOXA10, B3GNT5, ST3GAL6, DACH1, P2RX3, and chr8:23572595; and four internal control markers: CREM, GLYATL3, ELMOD3, and KLF9
breast cancer (87) vs. healthy subjects (80) 86.2% 82.7% [25]
GRAIL DNA methylation patterns of cfDNA for detecting various types of cancers including breast cancer training set: 844 N/A 99.8% false-positive rate: <1% [26]
validation set: 359 N/A 99.3% false-positive rate: <1%
GRAIL DNA methylation patterns of cfDNA for detecting breast cancer training set: Breast cancer (247) N/A N/A precision: 96% (82/85)
validation set: Breast cancer (104) N/A N/A precision: 93% (40/43)
DELFI fragmentation patterns of cfDNA breast cancer (54) vs. healthy subjects (245) 57.0% 98.0% [27]
DELFI fragmentation patterns of cfDNA combined with mutations of cfDNA breast cancer (54) vs. healthy subjects (245) 65.0% 98.0%
Circulating miRNAs a panel of five miRNAs: miR-1246, miR-1307-3p, miR-4634, miR-6861-5p, and miR-6875-5p breast cancer (1206), non-cancer controls (1343), benign breast diseases (54) 97.3% 82.9% accuracy: 89.7% [28]
a panel of seven miRNAs: Hsa-miR-126-5p, hsa-miR-144-5p, hsa-miR-144-3p, hsa-miR-301a-3p, hsa-miR- 126-3p, hsa-miR-101-3p, and hsa-miR-664b-5p triple-negative breast cancer (21) vs. healthy subjects (21) 83.8% 74.2% accuracy: 79.0%
AUC: 0.814
[29]
Extracellular vesicles fibronectin breast cancer (240) vs. non-cancer individuals (205) 65.1% 83.2% AUC: 0.81 [30]
developmental endothelial locus-1 protein (Del-1) breast cancer (100) vs. benign breast tumor (38), noncancerous diseases (58), and healthy subjects (46) 92.31% 86.62% [31]
Metabolites seven metabolites in the plasma: Glu, Orn, Thr, Trp, Met-SO, C2, and C3. training cohort:
breast cancer (80) vs. healthy subjects (100)
validation cohort:
breast cancer (109) vs. healthy subjects (50)
N/A N/A AUC in training cohort: 0.87;
AUC in validation cohort: 0.80
[32]
three metabolites (8-hydroxy-2ʹ-deoxyguanosine, 1-methylguanosine, 1-methyl adenosine) combined with CA15-3 malignant breast cancer (120) vs. benign breast disease (47) and healthy subjects (55) 88.8% 86.8% AUC: 0.94 [33]
seven metabolites in serum: Dimethyldodecane, galactose, α-glyceryl stearate, methyl stearate, 1(1-methoxycarbonyethyl)-4-(2-methyl-2-trimethylsilyl-oxypropyl) benzene, tetradecane, glucopyranoside pre-operative breast cancer patients (152) vs. healthy subjects (155) 96% 100% [34]
four plasma metabolites: L-octanoylcarnitine, 5-oxoproline, hypoxanthine, docosahexaenoic acid discovery set: Breast cancer (40) vs. healthy subjects (30);
validation set: Breast cancer (30) vs. healthy subjects (16)
N/A N/A positive predictive value: 100.0% [35]
metabolomics signature in the plasma breast cancer (91) vs. healthy subjects (20) up to 100.0% up to 100.0% [36]
Lipids a panel of five serum free fatty acids: C16:1, C18:3, C18:2, C20:4, C22:6. breast cancer (140) vs. healthy subjects (202) 83.3% 87.1% AUC: 0.953 [37]
Multi-analyte tests CancerSEEK testing of eight circulating proteins: CA-125, CA19-9, CEA, HGF, myeloperoxidase, OPN, prolactin, and TIMP-1; and mutations in 16 genes in cfDNA in the blood: NRAS, HRAS, KRAS, CTNNB1, PIK3CA, FBXW7, APC, EGFR, BRAF, CDKN2A, PTEN, FGFR2, AKT1, TP53, PPP2R1A, and GNAS patients with one of the eight cancer types including breast cancer (1005) vs. individuals without known cancers (812) 70.0% >99% [38]
breast cancer (209) vs. healthy subjects (812) 33.0% >99.0%
CancerSEEK tests for different types of cancers patients with cancers including breast cancer (96) vs. subjects without cancers (9,815) 27.1% 98.9% positive predictive value: 19.4% [39]
CancerSEEK tests for breast cancer breast cancer (27) 3.7% N/A
CancerSEEK remodeling with CancerA1DE method first dataset: 1817 patient blood test records
second dataset: 626 patient blood test records
70.0% 99.0% remodeling of the CancerSEEK dataset to improve the sensitivity [40]
Other body fluids Urine miRNAs (miR-21, miR-34a, miR-125b, miR-155, miR-195, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-375, miR-451) breast cancer (24) vs. healthy subjects (24) 91.7% 91.7% AUC: 0.932 [41]
four urinary microRNA types (miR-424, miR-423, miR-660, and let7-i) breast cancer (69) vs. healthy subjects (40) 98.6% 100.0% [42]
miRNA-21 and MMP-1 breast cancer (22) vs. healthy subjects (26) 95.0% 79.0% [43]
succinic acid and dimethyl-heptanoylcarnitine breast cancer (31) vs. healthy subjects (29) 93.5% 86.2% [44]
Breath a set of VOCs of oxidative stress breast cancer (51) vs. healthy subjects (42) 94.1% 73.8% [45]
3-methylhexane breast cancer (10) vs. healthy subjects (10) 100% 40% [46]
decene 100% 40%
caryophyllene 100% 60%
naphthalene 90% 70%
trichlorethylene 80% 70%
five breath VOCs: 2-propanol, 2,3-dihydro-1-phenyl-4(1H)-quinazolinone,1-phenyl-ethanone, heptanal and isopropyl myristate breast cancer (51) vs. healthy subjects (42) 93.8% 84.6% [47]
two commercial electronic noses breast cancer (48) vs. healthy subjects (45) N/A N/A an average of 95% accuracy [48]
BreathLink™ point-of-care breath testing systems breast cancer (50) vs. non-breast cancer subjects (543) 82.0% 77.1% accuracy: 83% [49]
VOCs collected by ultra-clean breath collection balloons breast cancer (54) vs. non-breast cancer subjects (124) N/A N/A low DF values: Negative predictive value > 99.9%;
high DF values: Positive predictive value rising to 100%
[50]
NAF Thomsen–Freidenreich (TF) antigen and its biosynthetic precursor Tn antigen breast cancer (25) vs. healthy subjects (25) N/A N/A detected in 92% of the cancerous breast NAF samples [51]
TF, Tn, and age information breast cancer (83) vs. benign disease (41) N/A N/A AUC: 0.83 [52]
combination of TF and uPA breast cancer (83) vs. benign disease (41) N/A N/A accuracy: 84-92% [53]
combination of TF, uPA and PAI-1 breast cancer (83) vs. benign disease (41) N/A N/A predictive ability reached 100%
deglycase DJ-1 protein 136 patients with nipple discharge (benign: 63; malignant: 73) 75.0% 85.9% [54]
proteomic profiles of NAFs breast cancer (18) vs. healthy subjects (4) N/A N/A 39 proteins differentially expressed in tumor-bearing vs. disease-free breasts [55]
dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) concentration breast cancer (160) vs. healthy subjects (157) N/A N/A higher DHEA concentrations in NAFs were associated with breast cancer [56]
Tears proteomic profiles of tears breast cancer (10) vs. healthy subjects (10) ~90.0% ~90.0% [57]
a panel of 20 proteins in tears breast cancer (50) vs. healthy subjects (50) ~70.0% ~70.0% [58]
MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS-driven semi-quantitative comparison of tear protein levels breast cancer (25) vs. healthy subjects (25) N/A N/A more than 20 proteins were differentially expressed in the tears [59]
surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectra of tear fluid breast cancer (5) vs. healthy subjects (5) 92% 100% accuracy: 96% [60]
Apocrine sweat 20 sweat markers breast cancer (70) vs. healthy subjects (53) 97% 72% [61]

* AUC, area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; CTC, circulating tumor cell; cfDNA, cell-free DNA; ctDNA, circulating tumor DNA; DELFI, DNA evaluation of fragments for early interception; MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight/time-of-flight mass spectrometry; NAF, nipple aspirate fluid; uPA, urinary plasminogen activator; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; VOC, volatile organic compound.