Table 2.
Comparisons of average total polyphenols in hop stems before flowering (BBCH stage 51–55; table—top triangle above grey-boxed area) and at the mature cones stage (BBCH stage 87–89; table—bottom triangle below grey—boxed area).
| VW | Variety | WT | StG | KM | Y | H | WC | A | M | WN | Cer | SG | B | F | Cel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | WT | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ||
| 1 | StG | *** | * | * | *** | ||||||||||
| 1 | KM | ** | *** | ** | *** | * | *** | * | *** | ||||||
| 1 | Y | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ** | *** | *** | |||
| 1 | H | *** | * | * | *** | ||||||||||
| 2 | WC | *** | *** | *** | |||||||||||
| 2 | A | ** | *** | ** | ** | *** | |||||||||
| 2 | M | *** | *** | ** | *** | *** | ** | *** | |||||||
| 3 | WN | *** | *** | * | *** | ** | *** | ||||||||
| 3 | Cer | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ||||||
| 3 | SG | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | ||||||||
| 3 | B | *** | ** | *** | * | ** | *** | ||||||||
| 3 | F | *** | * | ** | ** | *** | |||||||||
| 3 | Cel | * | * | * | *** |
VW resistance: 1, resistant; 2, moderately resistant; 3, susceptible; WT, Wye Target; StG, Styrian Gold; KM, Keyworth Midseason; Y, Yeoman; H, Herald; WC, Wye Challenger; A, Atlas; M, Magnum; Wye Northdown; Cer, Cerera; SG, Savinjski Golding; B, Buket; F, Fuggle; Cel, Celeia. Statistical significance based on contrast analysis for a linear model considering simultaneous multiple null hypothesis testing: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; blue squares, significantly lower average total polyphenols in the variety specified in row compared to the variety specified in column; orange squares, significantly higher average total polyphenols in the variety specified in row compared to the variety specified in column.