Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 13;17(20):7455. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207455

Table 5.

Results for the moderating role of innovativeness.

Path Low Group
(n = 114)
High Group
(n = 169)
Baseline Model Nested Model
β t-Value β t-Value
PP—ATT 0.667 8.100 ** 0.753 10.560 ** χ2 (670) = 1553.886 χ2 (671) = 1560.323 a
ATT—WOM intention 0.789 10.014 ** 0.775 11.406 ** χ2 (670) = 1553.886 χ2 (671) = 1554.294 b

Chi-square difference test: a Δχ2 (1) = 6.437, p < 0.05 (H4a—supported), b Δχ2 (1) = 0.408, p > 0.05 (H4b—not supported). Goodness-of-fit statistics for the baseline model: χ2 = 1553.886, df = 670, p < 0.001, χ2/df = 2.319, RMSEA = 0.069, CFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.911, NFI = 0.853, TLI = 0.899. Note 1: PP = perceived performance, ATT = attitude, RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation, CFI = comparative fit index, IFI = incremental fit index, NFI = normed fit index, TLI = Tucker–Lewis index. Note 2: ** p < 0.001.