Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 14;9(10):3300. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103300

Table 6.

Level of Evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE)) for dry needling on pain intensity, pressure pain sensitivity, and cervical range of motion in patients with neck pain.

Number of Studies Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness of Evidence Imprecision Publication Bias Quality of Evidence MD or SMD (95% CI)
Dry Needling vs. Sham/Control vs. Physical Therapy Modalities on Neck Pain Intensity
Immediate Follow-Up (less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 11) No Serious (I2 = 77%) No No No Moderate MD −0.75 (−1.43 to −0.06) *
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of Dry Needling (n = 6) No Serious (I2 = 58%) No Serious No Low MD −1.53 (−2.29 to −0.76) *
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD 0.19 (−0.61 to 1.00)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 2) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD −0.07 (−0.51 to 0.37)
Short-term Follow-Up (1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 24) No Very Serious (I2 = 87%) No No No Low MD −0.65 (−1.09 to −0.22) *
Sham/Placebo/waiting list/Other form of Dry Needling (n = 6) No Very Serious (I2 = 87%) No No No Low MD −2.31 (−3.64 to −0.99) *
Manual Therapy (n = 7) No Serious (I2 = 46%) No No No Moderate MD −0.53 (−0.97 to −0.09) *
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 13) No Serious (I2 = 44%) No No No Moderate MD 0.10 (−0.21 to 0.41)
Mid-term Follow-Up (more than 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 5) No No (I2 = 28%) No Very Serious No Low MD −0.27 (−0.73 to 0.18)
Manual Therapy (v = 2) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD −0.75 (−1.70 to 0.20)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 47%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −0.19 (−0.75 to 0.38)
Dry Needling vs. Sham/Control vs. Physical Therapy Modalities on Pain-Related Disability
Short-term Follow-Up (1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 20) No Serious (I2 = 58%) No No Yes Low SMD −0.26 (−0.48 to −0.05) *
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of Dry Needling (n = 5) No Serious (I2 = 79%) No No No Moderate SMD −0.87 (−1.60 to −0.14) *
Manual Therapy (n = 7) No No (I2 = 23%) No No No High SMD −0.20 (−0.49 to 0.10)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 9) No No (I2 = 12%) No No No High SMD −0.07 (−0.27 to 0.13)
Mid-term Follow-Up (more than 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 5) No Serious (I2 = 48%) No Very Serious No Very Low SMD −0.33 (−0.70 to 0.05)
Manual Therapy (n = 2) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low SMD −0.40 (−0.88 to 0.08)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 71%) No Very Serious No Very Low SMD −0.29 (−0.88 to 0.31)
Dry Needling vs. Sham/Control vs. Physical Therapy Modalities on Pressure Pain Thresholds
Immediate Follow-Up (less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 9) No Very Serious (I2 = 92%) No No No Low MD 4.93 (−42.18 to 52.04)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 4) No No (I2 = 28%) No Serious No Moderate MD 55.48 (27.03 to 83.93) *
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD −11.77 (−37.02 to 13.47)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 2) No Very Serious (I2 = 97%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −58.34 (−159.05 to 42.38)
Short-term Follow-Up (1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 17) No Very Serious (I2 = 95%) No No No Low MD 6.84 (−33.41 to 47.12)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Very Serious (I2 = 90%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 75.53 (−9.82 to 160.88)
Manual Therapy (n = 6) No Serious (I2 = 75%) No No No Moderate MD 32.25 (−1.02 to 65.52)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 8) No Very Serious (I2 = 93%) No No No Low MD −33.89 (−89.44 to 21.66)
Number of studies Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness of evidence Imprecision Publication bias Quality of evidence MD or SMD (95% CI)
Dry Needling vs. Sham/Control vs. Physical Therapy Modalities on Cervical Range of Motion
Cervical Flexion (Immediate Follow-Up, less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 5) No Very Serious (I2 = 83%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 1.93 (−5.90, 9.77)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Very Serious (I2 = 83%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 7.51 (−3.23, 18.25)
Manual Therapy (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD −6.43 (−17.96, 5.10)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD −6.37 (−11.09, −1.65)
Cervical Flexion (Short-term Follow-Up, 1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 10) No Very Serious (I2 = 85%) No No No Low MD 1.26 (−3.06, 5.58)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Very Serious (I2 = 87%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 6.76 (−4.53, 18.06)
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD 0.26 (−2.07, 2.60)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 4) No Very Serious (I2 = 92%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −1.74 (−10.51, 7.03)
Cervical Extension (Immediate Follow-Up, less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 5) No Serious (I2 = 63%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 5.23 (−1.05, 11.51)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 77%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 8.70 (−1.94, 19.35)
Manual Therapy (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD 1.95 (−11.47, 15.37)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD 0.68 (−5.01, 6.37)
Cervical Extension (Short-term Follow-Up, 1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 10) No Serious (I2 = 72%) No No Yes Low MD 0.34 (−3.02, 3.70)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 66%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 8.26 (−1.36, 17.88)
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No No (I2 = 0%) No Very Serious No Low MD −0.21 (−2.70, 2.28)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 4) No Very Serious (I2 = 85%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −3.04 (−9.94, 3.87)
Cervical Lateral-Flexion (Immediate Follow-Up, less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 4) No Serious (I2 = 67%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 2.65 (−2.07, 7.37)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 57%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 4.54 (−1.41, 10.48)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD −0.95 (−2.07, 7.37)
Cervical Lateral-Flexion (Short-term Follow-Up, 1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 10) No Very Serious (I2 = 86%) No No No Low MD 0.30 (−1.00, 1.61)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 66%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 3.21 (−2.28, 8.70)
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 77%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 1.09 (−1.11, 3.28)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 6) No No (I2 = 25%) No No No High MD −0.58 (−1.59, 0.42)
Cervical Rotation (Immediate Follow-Up, less than 1 week after single session)
Overall effect (n = 4) No Serious (I2 = 60%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 2.04 (−4.08, 8.15)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No No (I2 = 22%) No Very Serious No Low MD 4.51 (−0.96, 9.98)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 1) No No No Very Serious No Low MD −3.77 (−9.58, 2.04)
Cervical Rotation (Short-term Follow-Up, 1 to 12 weeks after intervention)
Overall effect (n = 9) No Serious (I2 = 74%) No No Yes Low MD −0.23 (−1.40, 1.09)
Sham/Placebo/Waiting list/Other form of dry needling (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 71%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD 6.20 (−1.08, 13.48)
Manual Therapy (n = 3) No Serious (I2 = 70%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −0.52 (−1.91, 0.87)
Other Physical Therapy Intervention (n = 5) No Serious (I2 = 47%) No Very Serious No Very Low MD −0.82 (−2.73, 1.09)

* Statistically significant (p < 0.05). Risk of bias: No: Most information is from results at a low risk of bias. Serious: Crucial limitation for one criterion, or some limitations for multiple criteria, sufficient to lower confidence in the estimate of the effect. and Very Serious: Crucial limitation for one or more criteria sufficient to substantially lower the confidence in the estimate of the effect. Inconsistency: Serious: I2 > 40% and Very Serious: I2 > 80%. Indirectness of Evidence: No indirectness of evidence was found in any study. Imprecision (based on the sample size): Serious: n < 250 subjects and Very Serious: n < 250 and the estimated effect is little or absent. Publication bias (based on funnel plots): Funnel plots are shown as Supplementary Files in those analyses with more than 10 trials. MD: mean differences and SMD: standardized mean differences.