Table 2.
Rate of force development (RFD) (N·s−1), maximum isometric force (MIF) (N), fatigue index (FI) (%) and time to maximum isometric force (Time) (s) (mean ± SD, 95% CI) in the different types of warm-up.
| RFD (N·m·s−1 s) X ± DP |
MIF (N) X ± DP |
FI (%) X ± DP |
Time (s) X ± DP |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (IC 95%) | (IC 95%) | (IC 95%) | (IC 95%) | |
| Without Warm up | 4153.11 ± 1025.72 (1895.50–6410.71) |
1005.07 ± 56.40 * (880.93–1129.21) |
10.33 ± 1.25 (7.58–13.08) |
2504.85 ± 311.39 (1819.48–3190.22) |
| Traditional | 2810.93 ± 470.96 (1774.36–3847.50) |
965.22 ± 56.23 (841.47–1088.98) |
9.16 ± 0.83 (7.34–10.98) |
2406.46 ± 430.78 (1458.33–3354.59) |
| Stretching | 2522.67 ± 417.16 (1604.51–3440.83) |
895.74 ± 45.62 * (795.33–996.15) |
9.16 ± 1.03 (6.89–11.43) |
2561.65 ± 419.72 (1637.86–3485.44) |
| p | 0.476 | 0.005 | 0.940 | 0.999 |
| η2p | 0.136 ## | 0.454 ### | 0.055 # | 0.006 # |
* p < 0.05 (ANOVA two-way, and post hoc de Bonferroni). η2p: # low effect, ## medium effect, ### high effect. RFD: rate of force development; MIF: maximum isometric force, FI: fatigue index and time: time to maximum isometric force. * indicates difference in maximum isometric force (MIF), between without warm-up and stretching.