Table 3.
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Block 1 | Block 2 | Block 3 | ||||||
β | R2 | β | R2 | β | R2 | β | R2 | |
0.299 | 0.140 | 0.247 | 0.412 | |||||
Age | −0.202 * | 0.167 | 0.246 ** | 0.132 | ||||
Gender a | ||||||||
Female | 0.101 | 0.287 *** | 0.248 *** | 0.177 ** | ||||
Ethnicity b | ||||||||
Chinese | 0.054 | −0.127 | −0.148 | −0.109 | ||||
Indian | −0.096 | 0.002 | 0.035 | −0.001 | ||||
Marital Status c | ||||||||
Married | 0.039 | −0.065 | −0.080 | −0.073 | ||||
Divorced | −0.001 | 0.058 | 0.058 | 0.065 | ||||
Education Level d | ||||||||
None | −0.200 ** | −0.011 | 0.067 | 0.033 | ||||
Primary | −0.443 *** | −0.185 | −0.013 | −0.034 | ||||
Secondary | −0.307 *** | −0.201 | −0.081 | −0.094 | ||||
Employment e Status | ||||||||
Working | −0.027 | 0.136 | 0.147 | 0.038 | ||||
Monthly Income f | ||||||||
≤RM1000 | −0.030 | 0.135 | 0.147 | 0.040 | ||||
Dialysis Vintage | 0.240 *** | 0.097 | 0.004 | 0.015 | ||||
Nutrition Literacy | 0.390 *** | −0.043 | ||||||
Dietary Knowledge | 0.105 | |||||||
Perceived Benefit | 0.016 | |||||||
Perceived Barrier | −0.011 | |||||||
Perceived Seriousness | 0.024 | |||||||
Perceived Susceptibility | 0.001 | |||||||
Perceived Self-Efficacy | 0.338 *** | |||||||
Self-Management Skills | 0.246 ** |
Reference group: a Male, b Malay, c Single, d Tertiary education, e Not working, f Income > RM1000. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. Model 1: Multiple Regression Model for Nutrition Literacy; Model 2: Hierarchical Multiple Regression Model for Dietary Adherence. Block 1: Sociodemographic Factors and Dialysis Vintage (control variables), Block 2: Block 1 + Nutrition Literacy. Block 3: Block 2 + Potential Mediators (Dietary Knowledge, Health Belief, and Self-Management Skills).