Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 15;12(10):3143. doi: 10.3390/nu12103143

Table 3.

Effect of intervention on serum AGEs concentration (ITT analysis).

AGE-Lowering Arm (n = 33) SOC Arm (n = 37)
Measured AGEs (nmole/L) Baseline Follow-Up Change (%) p 1 Baseline Follow-Up Change (%) p 1 p 2
CML 128.2 ± 52.5 124.8 ±45.4 −2.5 ± 31.5 0.6 112.5 ± 35.6 122.5 ± 52.2 +8.8 ± 39.6 0.1 0.5
3DGH 372.0 ± 207.3 397.2 ± 223.6 +6.7 ± 52.8 0.7 352.6 ± 169.9 372.9 ± 174.2 +5.7 ± 57.4 0.4 0.9
CEL 105.2 ± 43.1 94.6 ± 42.5 −9.9 ± 43.7 0.09 88.3 ± 29.8 91.9 ± 38.0 +3.9 ± 33.3 0.1 0.04
G-H1 12.0 ± 5.3 12.0 ± 5.7 +1.6 ± 4.1 0.9 10.2 ± 2.5 13.3 ± 7.7 +30.3 ± 68.6 <0.01 0.1
MG-H1 270.5 ± 169.5 248.8 ± 172.0 −8.0 ± 67.1 0.3 193.1 ± 92.7 265.7 ± 170.0 +37.3 ± 92.9 0.01 0.03

All values expressed as mean change ± SD. Abbreviations and explanation: AGEs: Advanced glycation end products; SOC; Standard of care; ITT: Intention to treat analysis; CML: Ne-carboxymethyl lysine; 3DGH: 3-deoxyglucosone hydroimidazolone; CEL: Ne-carboxyethyl lysine; G-H1: glyoxalhydroimidazolone; MG-H1: methylglyoxalhydroimidazolone. p 1 change between baseline and 6 months visit within arm; p 2 difference in mean change between AGE-lowering vs. SOC arms.