Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 17;10(10):1454. doi: 10.3390/biom10101454

Table 7.

Effect of citral on biochemical parameters of hepatic function in eutrophic (SD) and obese mice (HFD).

Groups AST (UI/L) ALT (UI/L) Alkaline Phosphatase (UI/L) GGT (UI/L)
SD HFD SD HFD SD HFD SD HFD
Tween 80 + Saline 113.60 ± 42.60 <2.0 63.29 ± 9.31 57.17 ± 4.01 37.57 ± 5.21 12.75 ± 0.48 a <1.0 <1.0
Tween 80 + LPS 110.70 ± 39.61 <2.0 51.71 ± 14.91 96.14 ± 16.21 17.00 ± 3.01 * 11.57 ± 9.64 <1.0 <1.0
IBU 100 + LPS <2.0 <2.0 72.83 ± 11.73 124.6 ± 29.08 21.40 ± 5.79 23.00 ± 0.01 <1.0 <1.0
Citral 300 + Saline 107.40 ± 44.79 <2.0 54.29 ± 11.26 92.25 ± 16.23 21.00 ± 1.86 10.67 ± 1.02 <1.0 <1.0
Citral 25 + LPS 111.20 ± 59.58 <2.0 81.83 ± 18.31 74.40 ± 6.56 22.00 ± 2.77 13.86 ± 0.86 <1.0 <1.0
Citral 100 + LPS 133.30 ± 61.01 <2.0 85.17 ± 26.22 227.30 ± 60.96 * 16.33 ± 2.09 * 17.43 ± 3.12 <1.0 <1.0
Citral 300 + LPS 114.10 ± 49.78 <2.0 59.71 ± 4.59 95.86 ± 20.26 26.14 ± 3.73 13.67 ± 2.22 <1.0 <1.0

All data are expressed as mean ± SEM for n = 6–8 per group. One-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test; * p < 0.05 vs. Tween 80 + saline. Two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s test; a = p < 0.05 compared to the SD mice.