Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 30;10:18759. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75990-x

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Quantitative RT-PCR analyses of selected sulphate transport genes (VvSULTR) in grapevine leaves. (A) Assessment of VvSULTR3.1 gene expression in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with Plasmopara viticola. (B) Assessment of VvSULTR3.1 gene expression in Sauvignon Blanc and Sauvignon Kretos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (C) Assessment of VvSULTR3.2 gene expression in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (D) Assessment of VvSULTR3.2 gene expression in Sauvignon Blanc and Sauvignon Kretos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (E) Assessment of VvSULTR3.3 gene expression in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (F) Assessment of VvSULTR3.3 gene expression in Sauvignon Blanc and Sauvignon Kretos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (G) Assessment of VvSULTR3.5 gene expression in Cabernet Sauvignon and Cabernet Volos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. (H) Assessment of VvSULTR3.5 gene expression in Sauvignon Blanc and Sauvignon Kretos, both non-inoculated and inoculated with P. viticola. The data were normalised to the tubulin and EF1α housekeeping genes. The relative expression ratios were calculated using untreated parental genotypes as a calibrator sample. The values reported are means ± SE of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences according to one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc tests (p < 0.05).