Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;8:e10184. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10184

Table 4. Relative abundance (%) of protozoal genera.

Relative abundance (%) of protozoal genera in the ruminal solid (SF) and liquid fraction (LF) of camels under different feeding systems. Animals in G1 fed a mixed ration, animals in G2 fed high-quality forage and animals in G3 fed low-quality forage (Mean ± SE).

Protozoa G1 G2 G3 Overall mean
Entodinium SF 23 ± 6 6.5 ± 0.6 6 ± 1 11 ± 3
Entodinium LF 54 ± 10 15 ± 2.5 5 ± 1 24 ± 6
Polyplastron S F 10 ± 1 17.5 ± 2 25 ± 3 17 ± 2
Polyplastron LF 6 ± 1 11 ± 0.2 24 ± 3 12 ± 2
Diplodinium S F 23 ± 1 35 ± 3 49 ± 10 34 ± 3
Diplodinium LF 13 ± 3 27 ± 3 61 ± 6 29 ± 5
Eudiplodinium SF 8 ± 0.6 8 ± 2 2 ± 0.7 7 ± 1
Eudiplodinium LF 4 ± 1 5.5 ± 1 2.5 ± 0.5 4.5 ± 0.6
Epidinium SF 5 ± 0.8 4 ± 1 2 ± 1 4 ± 0.1
Epidinium LF 3 ± 0.8 4.5 ± 0.6 1 ± 0.7 3.5 ± 0.5
Ophryoscolex SF 30 ± 4 27 ± 3 15 ± 5 26 ± 2.5
Ophryoscolex LF 19 ± 4 29 ± 0.6 6.5 ± 4 22 ± 3
Trichostomatia SF 0.1 ± 0.02 1 ± 0.25 0.3 ± 0.15 1 ± 0.2
Trichostomatia LF 0.2 ± 0.04 1 ± 0.2 1 ± 0.1 1 ± 0.2
Isotricha SF 0.2 ± 0.04 0.3 ± 0.05 0.3 ± 0.004 0.3 ± 0.03
Isotricha LF 0.5 ± 0.2 2 ± 0.9 0.3 ± 0.01 1 ± 0.5
Dasytricha SF 0.04 ± 0.01 1.5 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.15 1 ± 0.3
Dasytricha LF 0.1 ± 0.002 5.5 ± 0.8 0.5 ± 0.3 3 ± 1