Table 1.
ID | PT1 | PT2 | PT3 | PT4 | BE1 | BE2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Education level | PT M.Sc. | PT M.Sc. | PT M.Sc. | PT Ph.D. | BE Ph.D. | BE M.Sc. | |
Staff | Clinical | Clinical | Research | Research | Research | Research | |
sEMG knowledge* | Very poor | Very poor | Fair | Very poor | Excellent | Excellent | |
Phased of the study | Patient recruitment | X | X | ||||
Clinical assessment | X | X | |||||
sEMG acquisition | X | X | X | X | |||
o-RAGT | X | X | |||||
sEMG analysis | X | X |
The “X” shows the phases that each member of staff was involved in.
PT, Physical Therapist; BE, Biomedical Engineer; M.Sc., Master of Science; Ph.D., Philosophiae Doctor.
sEMG knowledge assessed by a five-points Likert scale: very poor (no knowledge about sEMG); poor (basic knowledge about muscle electrophysiology); fair (good knowledge of muscle electrophysiology and basic knowledge of detection/interpretation techniques); good (good knowledge of detection/interpretation techniques and ability to recognize artifacts, interference); excellent (good ability to detect, collect, process and interpret the signals).