ABSTRACT
Background
Fragile X–associated tremor and ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a late‐onset neurodegenerative disorder linked to the FMR1 premutation.
Objectives
FXTAS in women is far less common than in men, and this study represents the largest sample reported to date.
Methods
A total of 53 female premutation carriers with FXTAS (meanage, 66.83 years; FXTAS stages 2–5) and 55 age‐matched and demographic background–matched control participants (meanage, 61.94 years) underwent a comprehensive molecular, physiological, neuropsychological, and psychiatric assessment.
Results
The large sample of female premutation carriers showed a wide range of variability of clinical signs and symptom progression. The imaging results showed a middle cerebellar peduncles sign in only 6 patients; another symptom included high‐signal intensity in the splenium of the corpus callosum, and diffuse cerebral deep white matter changes (e.g., in the pons) are more common. The rate of psychiatric disorders, especially depression, is higher than in the general population. There is a clear impairment in executive functioning and fine motor skills in connection with a higher FXTAS stage.
Conclusions
The manifestation of FXTAS symptoms in female carriers can be diverse with a milder phenotype and a lower penetrance than those observed in male premutation carriers. The middle cerebellar peduncles sign is present in only a small percentage of the sample, and we propose that the imaging criteria for FXTAS in women need to be expanded.
Keywords: FXTAS, FMR1 female premutation
Fragile X–associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) was first described in 2001 as a late‐onset neurodegenerative disorder in the grandfathers of children with full‐mutation fragile X syndrome. 1 The initial symptoms of FXTAS can include intention tremor, typically beginning at age 60 years, with ataxia occurring on average 2 years later. 2 , 3 , 4 Some patients with FXTAS report little or no tremor. Usually, when tremor is present, memory problems and often executive function deficits can also manifest. 5 , 6 Once ataxia starts, a more severe decline in motor and cognitive function usually ensues. 4 Approximately 50% of males with FXTAS will develop dementia,7 and approximately 30% to 60% will have significant parkinsonism. 8 , 9 In addition, neurological symptoms often associated with pain—including neuropathy—may begin before the onset of tremor. 10 , 11 , 12 Emotional problems including anxiety, depression, irritability, and eventually apathy are common in those with FXTAS; although anxiety or depression usually begins before the onset of FXTAS. 13 , 14 , 15
Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with FXTAS often shows global brain atrophy with white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in the middle cerebellar peduncles (MCP sign), the pons, the periventricular area, the splenium of the corpus callosum, and in the deep cortical and cerebellar white matter. 2 , 4 , 12 , 16 The neuropathology of FXTAS includes spongiosis of the area of WMH and the presence of eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions in neurons and astrocytes throughout the brain and in the peripheral nervous system in addition to many other organs. 17 , 18 The diagnostic criteria for FXTAS were initially reported in 2003 2 with the addition of inclusions added in 2004 19 to characterize definite FXTAS after death. After an international conference on the premutation, the diagnostic criteria for FXTAS were expanded to include white matter disease in the splenium of the corpus callosum and neuropathy. 20 , 21 , 22 The lifetime prevalence for developing FXTAS is 1:3000 to 1:6000 in men, 23 with a penetrance for male premutation carriers older than 60 years of age at 38%. This increases to 75% for male carriers 80 years of age and older. 24
Women were originally thought to be unaffected as initial prevalence studies suggested. 24 However, women with FXTAS were subsequently reported in 2004 25 and thereafter in small cohorts; however, their phenotype is usually less severe than in men, 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 with a few exceptions where significant dementia has been reported. 30 , 31 A few studies documented the prevalence of FXTAS at 13% to 16% in older women who are premutation carriers. 32 , 33 , 34 Approximately 60% of men with FXTAS show the MCP sign, 27 , 35 but only 13% of women show this clinical radiological sign. 27 The less severe clinical symptoms in women may be caused by the activation of the second normal X chromosome, although the activation ratio between women with and without FXTAS did not differ. 26 , 32 , 36 Another study suggested that women with skewed activation ratios demonstrated no FXTAS if the skewing was in favor of the normal X, but women consistently demonstrated FXTAS if the skewing was in favor of the mutated X. 37 The correlation between the X inactivation and FXTAS was also previously reported in a few cases. 26 , 38
Women with FXTAS often experience immune‐mediated disorders compared with age‐matched control women, and these problems include fibromyalgia and hypothyroidism. 32 , 39 , 40 , 41 Mood and anxiety disorders are prevalent in the fragile X premutation carrier population. 42 They are even more pronounced in the FXTAS population, which is perhaps due to the difficulty of coping with the diagnosis itself. Other neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) have been linked to neuropsychiatric syndromes, especially depression and psychosis. 43 However, the lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders is significantly higher in premutation carriers with FXTAS than in healthy controls, which could mean that FXTAS is not merely a neurological disorder but a neuropsychiatric syndrome as well. 42 Indeed, in 2019, Hagerman and colleagues described fragile X–associated neuropsychiatric disorders to summarize the most common problems associated with the FMR1 premutation. 44
Methods
Participants
Participants were recruited through the University of California Davis (UC Davis) Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Institute's Fragile X Research and Treatment Center and local advertisements. The participants required molecular documentation of the FMR1 premutation or normal allele. Individuals with a gray zone allele or mosaicism with the full mutation were not included (see the Molecular Analysis section). For premutation participants, only those with FXTAS stages 2 through 5 13 were recruited for this study (see the Measures section). All participants provided informed consent for a protocol approved by the UC Davis institutional review board. The final sample included 53 women with the FMR1 premutation and a diagnosis of FXTAS (average age, 66.83; standard deviation [SD], 9.65) and 55 unaffected female control participants without the premutation (average age, 61.94; SD, 7.01).
Measures
Each participant underwent a detailed medical history and physical/neurological examination performed by a physician with expertise in FXTAS (R.J.H.). The history included information on development; past surgeries; current and past medical issues, including pain; as well as any current and past medications. The participants self‐reported their current medications and illegal substance use, which was categorized into different pharmaceutical groups and entered into the study database (eg, antidepressant, anxiolytics, etc.).
Neurological issues, including tremor, coordination, muscle tone, reflexes, strength, sensation, and gait, were covered in particular depth during both the history and physical/neurological examinations. The standardized neurological examination included an assessment of the cranial nerves, including lateral, superior, and inferior eye movements; extremity or head movement problems, including tremor and ataxia; tandem gait; frontal release signs, including snout, jaw jerk, and palmomental reflex; sensory examination of pinprick and vibration sense; and assessment of alternating movements and cranial nerves, as developed by Dr. Leehey at the University of Colorado. 3 , 45 , 46 Premutation carriers were considered to have FXTAS if they met the possible, probable, or definite criteria; see Table 1. 2 Staging of the illness was also done during these visits using previously defined criteria. 13 Briefly, stage 1 participants demonstrated subtle or unclear tremor or balance problems without a significant impact on normal daily function. These individuals were not included in this study because they did not meet the diagnostic criteria for FXTAS. Stage 2 participants (n = 14 in sample) showed minor but clearly apparent tremor and/or balance problems. These symptoms had no more than minor interference on their daily functioning. Stage 3 participants (n = 21) had a moderate tremor and/or balance problems that had a significant impact on their daily functioning. Participants at this stage must have had at least 1 fall. Stage 4 participants (n = 16) had severe tremor and/or balance problems, required assistance with many activities of daily living, and used either a cane or walker while walking. Stage 5 participants (n = 2) were incapacitated by their tremor and/or balance problems to the extent that required daily use of a wheelchair. Stage 6 participants are bedridden, and no individuals with this stage were included in the current study.
TABLE 1.
FXTAS clinical criteria in study sample
| Criteria | Description | N (Premutation Group) | N (control Group) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular | FMR1 CGG repeat size 55–200 | 53 | 0 |
| Major signs | Intention tremor | 43 | 3 |
| Other tremor: | |||
| •Resting | 11 | 5 | |
| •Intermittent | 16 | 1 | |
| •Postural | 35 | 2 | |
| •Any | 47 | 4 | |
| •Handwriting problems | 52 | 4 | |
| •Impaired finger to nose | 42 | 2 | |
| Gait ataxia | 45 | 3 | |
| Other motor problems: | |||
| •Wheelchair bound | 5 | 0 | |
| •Walker | 4 | 0 | |
| •Cane | 17 | 2 | |
| •Falling | 29 | 2 | |
| •Low motor tone | 16 | 0 | |
| Minor signs | Parkinsonism: | ||
| Masked facies | 4 | 0 | |
| Increased tone | 4 | 0 | |
| Pill‐rolling tremor | 1 | 0 | |
| Stiff gait | 1 | 0 | |
| Moderate to severe short‐term memory deficits | 43 | 8 | |
| WMS‐III Auditory Immediate Index Score | 110.50 (SD 17.74) | 117.66 (SD 16.92) | |
| WMS‐III Working Memory Index Score | 101.55 (SD 12.40) | 111.75 (SD 13.50) | |
| Executive function deficits | 41 | 1 | |
| BDS‐2 score | 15.38 (SD 4.25) | 22.23 (SD 2.93) | |
| COWAT total score | 36.73 (SD 12.96) | 46.97 (SD 13.82) | |
| Stroop Color‐Word Score | 45.63 (SD 9.57) | 50.82 (SD 7.12) | |
| SDMT | 46.12 (SD 11.43) | 56.50 (SD 13.15) | |
| Processing Speed Index Score (WAIS‐III) | 97.02 (SD 16.49) | 113.24 (SD 13.45) | |
| Major radiological signs | MRI WM lesions in the middle cerebellar peduncles | 6 | 0 |
| Minor radiological signs | MRI WM lesions in cerebral white matter | ||
| •Pons | 20 | 3 | |
| •Diffuse deep WM | 21 | 6 | |
| •Splenium | 34 | 2 | |
| Moderate to severe generalized atrophy | 37 | 6 | |
| Definite FXTAS | 1 Major radiological sign + 1 major clinical symptom | 6 | N/A |
| Probable FXTAS | Either 1 major radiological + 1 minor clinical or 2 major clinical symptoms | 37 | N/A |
| Possible FXTAS | 1 Minor radiological sign + 1 major clinical symptom | 10 | N/A |
Adapted from Jacquemont et al.2 and Hall and O'Keefe. 8
Abbreviations: FXTAS, fragile X–associated tremor and ataxia syndrome; WMS‐III, Wechsler Memory Scale, Third Edition; BDS‐2, Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale, Second Edition; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; WM, white matter; SD, standard deviation; N/A, not applicable.
For the assessment of the neuropsychological profile, we used measures of cognitive function: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition, 47 Mini Mental State Exam, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (semantic fluency), Purdue Pegboard, Symbol Digit Modalities (processing speed), and Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale 2 (frontal‐motor executive function). 48
For the socioemotional and psychopathological profile, the structured clinical interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition axis I disorders 49 was administered to all the study participants.
Neuroimaging
The structural MRIs were acquired for each study participant at the UC Davis Imagining Research Center using both a 1.5T General Electric (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) Signa Horizon LX Nitrogen‐Vacancy/Ions (NV/I) scanner with echospeed gradients with a standard General Electric whole‐head coil and a 3T Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) Trio with an 8‐channel or a 32‐channel head coil. A diagnostic neuroradiology specialist rated the images for symptoms of the MCP sign, white matter changes in the pons, significant diffuse cerebral deep white matter changes, atrophy, and high‐signal intensity in the anterior subependymal region of the splenium of the corpus callosum.
Molecular Analysis
The presence of a premutation allele was determined by using a combination of Southern blot and polymerase chain reaction approach. Genotyping analyses performed as previously described. 50 , 51 Individuals who harbored a gray zone allele (CGG between 45 and 54 repeats) or mosaicism (some cells carry alleles in the premutation range and some in the full mutation range) were not included in this study. The activation ratio, indicating the percent of cells carrying the normal allele on the active X chromosome, was measured using ratios of the computer‐quantified signal intensity of chosen Southern blot bands as previously described. 52
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM (Armonk, NY) Statistics 26.0. Normal distribution of data was tested with the Kolmogorov–Smirnoff procedure, and descriptive statistics (mean and SD) were also calculated. The differences of variables from the physical examination and medical history, the neuropsychological and psychiatric assessments, and the imaging data compared with their occurrence depending on FXTAS stage was tested with analyses of variance, Pearson χ2, and Kruskal–Wallis tests, and the relationship with molecular data was calculated with Pearson parametric correlations for normal distribution data and Spearman ρ coefficient correlations for nonparametric data. A Bonferroni post hoc correction for multiple comparisons was applied.
Results
FXTAS severity in women with the premutation ranged from stage 2 through stage 5 involvement, with their mean age of diagnosis at 68.56 years (range, 52.34–83.90 years; SD, 9.10). Table 1 provides an overview of the clinical criteria of FXTAS in the study sample, depending on major and minor signs. Table S1 provides an overview of the major and minor clinical symptoms on an individual patient level.
Table 2 provides additional sample data including information about FXTAS diagnosis, age of menopause, tremor and ataxia onset, and molecular measures.
TABLE 2.
Patient demographics
| Criteria | N | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | SD | P (ANOVA) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FXTAS age diagnosed | ||||||
| Control | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Premutation | 44 | 52.34 | 83.90 | 68.56 | 9.10 | |
| Age of menopause | ||||||
| Control | 37 | 35 | 62 | 49.56 | 5.65 | 0.000 |
| Premutation | 42 | 27 | 55 | 42.42 | 7.60 | |
| Tremor onset | ||||||
| Control | 4 | 54 | 70 | 60.50 | 6.81 | ns |
| Premutation | 45 | 30 | 82 | 59.49 | 12.70 | |
| Ataxia onset | ||||||
| Control | 3 | 54 | 81 | 68.33 | 13.58 | ns |
| Premutation | 48 | 24 | 80 | 60.81 | 12.03 | |
| CGG normal allele | ||||||
| Control | 55 | 14 | 40 | 27.32 | 4.66 | ns |
| Premutation | 53 | 17 | 42 | 28.53 | 4.74 | |
| CGG premutation allele | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Control/premutation | 53 | 57 | 112 | 85.38 | 13.47 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ANOVA, analysis of variance; FXTAS, fragile X–associated tremor and ataxia syndrome; N/A, not applicable; ns, no significant differences.
Figure 1 shows the distribution of the premutation allele size (CGG repeats) for the 53 women with the premutation. The mean CGG repeat size was 85.38 (SD, 13.47; CGG range, 57–112), and the mean mRNA activation ratio was 0.49 (SD, 0.22; range, 0.00–1.00).
FIG 1.

CGG repeat allele size distribution in the premutation subjects included in the study.
The correlation of CGG repeat size with age of menopause (R .126, p .427), tremor age of onset (R −.221, p .145), and ataxia age of onset (R −.203, p .166) did not show a significant effect, contradicting previous reports 53 , 54 (see Figure S1).
Table 3 shows the comparison of cognitive and executive function measures. The significant differences between women with FXTAS and the control group on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition are apparent in the performance and processing speed scales, but not in verbal functioning or Working Memory Index score. The average full‐scale intelligence quotient (IQ) for women with FXTAS was 105.37 (SD, 12.87) compared with 114.98 (SD, 13.43) in the control group (P < 0.001). The average nonverbal performance IQ in the FXTAS group was expectedly lower (102.62; SD, 14.19) compared with unaffected female controls (115.68; SD, 15.15; P < 0.001). Similarly, the Processing Speed Index score was significantly lower (FXTAS, 97.02 and SD, 16.49; control, 113.24 and SD, 13.45; P < 0.001). The performance IQ and Processing Speed Index scores are affected by tremor (eg, the block design, digit symbol coding, and symbol search performance are typically impaired by a hand tremor). The measures of executive function (Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale 2), the Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, and the Mini Mental State Exam also showed significant differences between the 2 groups (see Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Cognitive and executive functioning differences between control and premutation participants
| Control (N = 55) | Premutation (N = 53) | ANOVA | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Criteria | M | SD | M | SD | F(Sig*) |
| WAIS‐III Verbal IQ | 112.11 | 12.28 | 107.68 | 13.41 | 2.69 ns |
| WAIS‐III Performance IQ | 115.68 | 15.15 | 102.62 | 14.19 | 18.03*** |
| WAIS‐III Full‐Scale IQ | 114.98 | 13.43 | 105.37 | 12.87 | 12.00*** |
| WAIS‐III Verbal Comprehension Index Score | 113.77 | 11.93 | 108.70 | 14.06 | 3.41 ns |
| WAIS‐III Perceptual Organization Index Score | 113.93 | 15.52 | 104.24 | 14.29 | 9.50** |
| WAIS‐III Working Memory Index Score | 106.07 | 12.92 | 102.17 | 13.85 | 1.84 ns |
| WAIS‐III Processing Speed Index Score | 113.24 | 13.45 | 97.02 | 16.49 | 24.14*** |
| COWAT (total score) | 46.97 | 13.82 | 36.73 | 12.96 | 12.41*** |
| Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale, Second Edition | 22.23 | 2.93 | 15.38 | 4.25 | 66.31*** |
| Mini Mental State Exam | 29.46 | .89 | 28.76 | 1.76 | 3.95* |
| Symbol Digit Modalities Test | 56.50 | 13.15 | 46.12 | 11.43 | 15.46*** |
*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; ANOVA, analysis of variance; IQ, intelligence quotient; ns, not significant; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test.
To explore this further, we calculated the individual neuropsychological differences according to FXTAS stage (see Table 4). As expected, the assessment that included a motor component (Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale 2, performance IQ, Purdue Pegboard) showed the most significant effects of FXTAS stage. In addition, the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (a verbal test with frontal executive component) showed significantly worse performance in stages 3, 4, and 5 of FXTAS.
TABLE 4.
Neuropsychological differences depending on FXTAS stage
| FXTAS stage | 2, N = 14; M (SD) | 3, N = 21; M (SD) | 4, N = 16; M (SD) | 5, N = 2; M (SD) | P | Controls, N = 55; M (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAIS‐III Full Scale IQ | 107.38 (11.42) | 109.56 (13.90) | 98.71 (10.89) | 97 (0.31) | 0.002 | 114.98 (13.43) |
| WAIS‐III Verbal IQ | 108.69 (13.25) | 110.33 (11.29) | 103.40 (15.98) | 111.00 (0.41) | ns | 112.11 (12.28) |
| WAIS‐III Performance IQ | 105.15 (11.76) | 106.74 (15.68) | 96.36 (11.31) | 79 (2.31) | 0.000 | 115.68 (15.15) |
| WAIS‐III Working Memory | 103.31 (14.32) | 104.44 (11.62) | 99.67 (15.88) | 84.00 (9.01) | ns | 106.07 (12.92) |
| BDS‐2 | 16.77 (3.76) | 16.47 (4.70) | 13.14 (3.11) | 10 (1.23) | 0.000 | 22.23 (2.93) |
| COWAT total score | 40.77 (16.48) | 39.25 (10.89) | 30.31 (10.19) | 11 (3.21) | 0.001 | 46.97 (13.82) |
| MMSE | 28.45 (1.50) | 29.23 (1.14) | 28.00 (2.92) | 29.50 (0.70) | ns | 29. 46 (0.89) |
| Purdue Pegboard | 31.54 (6.61) | 30.32 (4.49) | 25.14 (8.61) | Missing | 0.000 | 38.46 (5.31) |
Abbreviations: FXTAS, fragile X–associated tremor and ataxia syndrome; SD, standard deviation; WAIS‐III, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third Edition; BDS‐2, Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale, Second Edition; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; MMSE, Mini Mental State Exam; ns, not significant.
From the medical exam, the most common symptoms in the sample were numbness (37 FXTAS, 11 controls), muscle pain (30 FXTAS, 6 controls), autonomic problems (33 FXTAS, 9 controls), severe cramps (27 FXTAS, 4 controls), osteoarthritis (27 FXTAS, 11 controls), muscle weakness (25 FXTAS, 1 control), peripheral neuropathy (37 FXTAS, 6 controls), migraines (21 FXTAS, 4 controls), bladder incontinence (25 premutation, 8 controls), thyroid problems (20 FXTAS, 7 controls), restless leg syndrome (18 FXTAS, 6 controls), hearing loss (19 FTXAS, 6 controls), fibromyalgia (11 FXTAS, 3 controls), and osteoporosis (14 FXTAS, 7 controls).
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders interview showed elevated rates for depression, panic disorder, social phobia, specific phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder (Table 5) in the female FXTAS group compared to both the female control group and the prevalence rates published by the National Institute of Mental Health 55 for the general US adult population (men and women). Data for substance abuse, alcohol (0 FXTAS, 2 controls) and cannabis (0 FXTAS, 0 controls) was also obtained, although the prevalence rates were decreased compared with previous reports in male premutation carriers. 14 , 56
TABLE 5.
Psychiatric differences (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Disorders, DSM‐IV criteria)
| Criteria | Premutation (N = 53) | % of N | Control (N = 55) | % of N | P (Fisher Exact Test) | Lifetime prevalence in US adult population a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MDD | 29 | 54.71 | 11 | 20 | 0.049 | 16.5 |
| Dysthymia | 3 | 5.66 | 4 | 7.27 | ns | 2.5 |
| Bipolar I d/o | 1 | 1.88 | 0 | 0 | ns | 3.9 |
| Panic disorder | 9 | 16.98 | 1 | 1.81 | 0.010 | 4.7 |
| Social phobia | 20 | 37.7 | 6 | 10.90 | 0.000 | 12.1 |
| Specific phobia | 17 | 32.07 | 10 | 18.18 | 0.001 | 12.5 |
| Generalized anxiety | 9 | 16.98 | 3 | 5.45 | 0.028 | 5.7 |
| PTSD | 3 | 5.66 | 2 | 3.63 | ns | 6.8 |
| OCD | 1 | 1.88 | 1 | 1.81 | ns | 1.6 |
Data from Kessler et al.51 Sex differences not reported for individual psychiatric disorders.
Abbreviations: DSM‐IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition; MDD, major depressive disorder; Bipolar I d/o, Bipolar I disorder; PTSD, posttraumatic stress disorder; OCD, obsessive compulsive disorder; ns, not significant.
Table 6 shows that women with FXTAS take a much higher rate of prescription medications, especially for neuropsychiatric conditions, and over‐the‐counter medications than unaffected, age‐matched female controls. There are no significant differences in stimulants, osteoporosis treatments, or substance abuse, including illegal substances.
TABLE 6.
Self‐reported medications in the study sample
| Criteria | Premutation, N = 53; n (%) | Controls, N = 55; n (%) | P (ANOVA) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neuropsychiatric medications | |||
| Antidepressants | 30 (56.6) | 14 (25.45) | 0.005 |
| Anxiolytics | 104 (18.86) | 11 (20) | 0.000 |
| Stimulants | 4 (7.54) | 1 (1.81) | ns |
| Antipsychotic/mood stabilizer/anticonvulsants | 15 (28.3) | 4 (7.27) | 0.002 |
| Medications for treatments of somatic complaints | |||
| Anti‐inflammatory | 32 (60.37.7) | 14 (25.45) | 0.009 |
| ChEIs/NMDA antagonists | 18 (33.96) | 1 (1.81) | 0.000 |
| Hormonal supplements a /Immunomodulators | 28 (52.83) | 18 (32.72) | 0.001 |
| Dietary b /diabetic | 34 (64.15) | 14 (25.45) | 0.000 |
| Osteoporosis medication | 9 (16.98) | 5 (9.09) | ns |
| OTC supplements/omega3/vitamins | 24 (12.7) | 13 (7.15) | 0.006 |
| Drugs of abuse c | 14 (26.41) | 9 (16.36) | ns |
Levothyroxine, estrogen, anti‐estrogens, progestin, bronchodilators, and neurohormones.
Statins, laxatives, diuretics, antidiarrheal, probiotics, gastroesophageal reflux disease medication.
Opioids, cocaine, alcohol abuse, and polydrug dependency.
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; ChEIs, cholinesterase inhibitors; NMDA, N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate; OTC, over the counter; ns, not significant.
Neuropathology/Neuroimaging Findings
The patients were scanned on a 3T Siemens Magnetom TrioTim syngo MR B15 MRI system with either an 8‐channel or a 32‐channel head coil. The structural observations were done with the T2 fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery images sagittal plane, T2 turbo spin echo acquisition in the oblique axial plane. After recording, the images were evaluated for the presence of increased T2 signal intensity in the cerebrum, pons, cerebellum, and corpus callosum. Figure 2A–D provides examples for the most common findings, with Figure 2A showing a severe form of WMH. The most common MRI findings in the women with FXTAS was a general atrophy in different areas of the cortex (37 of 53 women, 69.81%); only 6 control participants showed this finding (10.90%). A high‐signal intensity in the anterior subependymal region of the splenium of the corpus callosum was found in 34 women with FXTAS (64.15%) compared with only 2 controls (3.63%). The MCP sign occurred in only 6 women (11.32%) with FXTAS. A total of 20 women with FXTAS had WMH in the pons (37.73%) compared with only 3 (5.45%) female controls. Of the patients, 21 showed diffuse cerebral deep white matter changes (39.62%) compared with only 6 (10.90%) controls.
FIG 2.

Overview of magnetic resonance imaging findings in selected women with fragile X–associated tremor and ataxia syndrome, white arrows pointing to region of interest. (A) Severely increased T2 signal intensity in the deep white matter of the cerebrum, especially in the periventricular regions. (B) Increased T2 signal intensity in the pons. (C) Increased T2 signal intensity in the middle cerebellar peduncles (sign). (D) Increased T2 signal intensity in the splenium of the corpus callosum and a general thinning of the corpus callosum.
Discussion
FXTAS in women with the FMR1 premutation is far less common than in men, and this study represents the largest group of women with FXTAS reported to date. The mean age of FXTAS diagnosis for these participants was 68.56 years, which is slightly older than the average age of diagnosis in men. 3 Women with FXTAS also had a broad spectrum of phenotypic variability; however, studies reported that female premutation carriers do not always report medical issues consistent with their doctor's diagnosis. 57
From a neuropsychological perspective, the most remarkable finding is the lack of decline in cognitive verbal ability (up to stage 4), working memory, and in Mini Mental State Exam score through the stages of FXTAS, which differs from previous reports regarding cognitive deficits in men with FXTAS. 7 , 58 , 59 On the other hand, there was a decline in executive function, and cognitive/motor performance abilities throughout the stages of FXTAS in these women. The executive function and performance abilities are known cognitive problems associated with FXTAS in both men and women, and in some individuals, these problems begin even before the onset of tremor and ataxia. 5 , 59 It is likely that the tremor interferes with performance during performance IQ testing.
Another remarkable difference compared with men with FXTAS is the degree of MRI involvement. A previous small report demonstrated the MCP sign in up to 13% of women with FXTAS, 27 and this study provides further evidence of the lower rate in this particular finding. Moreover, this is significantly different from the 60% prevalence in men with FXTAS. 60 The MCP sign is a major radiological criterion for the diagnosis of FXTAS, but this finding is less common in women and thus less sensitive for detecting those women with FXTAS. Conversely, WMH in the splenium of the corpus callosum was the most common pathological MRI finding in this study. Apartis and colleagues 12 first recognized the higher frequency of WMH in the splenium of the corpus callosum, subsequently suggesting its addition as a major criterion for diagnosis in FXTAS. 12 The current data suggest that this sign may serve as a more reliable metric in the diagnosis of FXTAS in women with the premutation. Longitudinal studies are warranted to see if disease progression on MRI is significantly different in female participants with FXTAS compared with males.
Many of the medical problems associated with the premutation, including fibromyalgia, autonomic problems (eg, bowel and bladder incontinence), and peripheral neuropathy, are reported here. Although pain was seen in >40% of the women with FXTAS, there was no significant increase in the use of opioids (11%) compared with age‐matched controls (6.3%). Previous reports have shown increased use of alcohol or other drugs of abuse in men with the premutation, 14 , 56 , 61 which we did not find in this study on women with the FMR1 premutation. Neurons with the premutation have increased stress markers with premature loss of viability compared with controls 62 and thus may be at higher risk for cell death from exposure to toxic substances. It is possible there was not a large enough sample size or perhaps a sampling bias (discussed later) that contributed to this. Future research should be directed in this area as case reports have theorized substance abuse accelerates the disease progression of FXTAS. 63 , 64 , 65 , 66
In general, tremors are often diagnosed as an essential or familial tremor early on. Nevertheless, the significant worsening of these symptoms within the FXTAS pathology spectrum begins later in life. This usually occurs in the patient's 60s, but may occur earlier after deleterious events such as a prolonged surgery, general anesthesia, significant psychiatric distress or medical illness, or drug use. 41 , 64 , 65 , 66
This study demonstrated significantly higher rates of multiple psychiatric disorders in women with FXTAS compared with age‐matched controls, including major depressive disorder, panic disorder, social phobia, and generalized anxiety disorder. There was no significant correlation with FXTAS stage and onset of psychiatric disorders; the majority of women who were carriers reported a higher rate of depression and anxiety at earlier stages of FXTAS (stages 2 and 3). The medications used demonstrated that these problems are being treated, and antidepressants, anxiolytics, and antipsychotics/mood stabilizers were used at increased rates compared with controls.
The limitations of our study include a sample bias because women with FXTAS will often self‐refer, and they may represent a more severely affected sample compared to one obtained in a screening study or with an unbiased selection. Also, the majority of our sample consisted of participants with a higher socioeconomic status and White ethnicity. Furthermore, we did not control for having a child with neurodevelopmental disorders, including fragile X syndrome, autism, or other significant medical issues in either the premutation or the control group. This could have caused a bias toward a higher rate of depression and anxiety.
This study is the most extensive report to date characterizing the phenotypic profile of women with the FMR1 premutation and FXTAS. The results showed increased rates of major depressive disorder, panic disorder, social and specific phobias, and generalized anxiety disorder compared with women without the premutation. This study also provided new insights that cognitive performance and working memory may be less impaired compared with men with FXTAS and that WMH in the corpus callosum may be a better sign of FXTAS in women compared with the MCP sign, which is more common in men. Further studies should be conducted analyzing longitudinal MRI changes and whether FXTAS progresses more slowly in women compared with men.
Author Roles
(1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.
A.Schneider: 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A
S.S.: 1C, 3B
F.T.: 1C, 3B
A.Seritan: 1C, 3B
D.H.: 1A, 2C, 3B
P.H.: 1A, 1B, 3B
R.H.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B
Disclosures
Ethical Compliance Statement
This study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of California at Davis, Protocol‐ID 240410‐7, study “Characterization and Treatment of CNS Abnormalities in Carriers of Fragile X” and institutional review board ID 254134‐23, study “Genotype‐Phenotype Relationships in Fragile X Families,” Federal‐Wide‐Assurance no. 00004557; expiration date, December 22, 2020; IRB Organization Number, 0000251. Informed consent was obtained from all patients and control participants, who signed an informed consent document before the beginning of study participation. We confirm that we have read the Journal's position on issues involved in ethical publication and affirm that this work is consistent with those guidelines.
Funding Sources and Conflict of Interest
This work was supported by Grants HD036071 (Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development), UL1DE019583 (National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research), RL1AG032115 (National Institute on Aging), AG18442 (National Institute on Aging), and UL1 TR000002; linked award TL1 TR000133, Health and Human Administration of Developmental Disabilities 90DD0596; and the National Institutes of Health–funded Medical Investigation of Neurodevelopmental Disorders Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center (U54 HD079125).
Financial Disclosures for the Previous 12 Months
Andrea Schneider, PhD, reports UC Davis employment and grant funding. Scott Summers, MD, reports Veterans Affairs and UC Davis employment. Flora Tassone, PhD, reports UC Davis employment and grant funding. Andreea Seritan, MD, reports UC San Francisco employment and grant funding. David Hessl, PhD, reports UC Davis employment, grant funding, honoraria, and consultancy and advisory boards: Novartis, Roche, Seaside Therapeutics, and Marinus. Paul Hagerman, MD, reports UC Davis employment and grant funding. Randi Hagerman, MD, reports UC Davis employment, grant funding, honoraria, and consultancy and advisory boards: Zynerba, Ovid, and Fulcrum Therapeutics. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report related to this work.
Supporting information
Figure S1 (a) Relation of CGG repeat size and tremor age of onset. (b) Relation of CGG repeat size and ataxia age of onset.
Table S1 FXTAS criteria in FMR1 premutation sample, individual level.
Acknowledgments
We thank Patrick Adams for administering the magnetic resonance imaging scans, Dr. Zukhrofi Muzar and Lindsey Partington for data support, Kylee Cook for help with data retrieval, Dan Thu Nguyen and Andrew Ligsay for critically reviewing the manuscript, and Jennifer Cogswell for the majority of the neuropsychological testing. We would also like to thank Louise Gane for her genetic counseling and patient support. Also, we thank all the participants and their families.
Relevant disclosures and conflicts of interest are listed at the end of this article.
References
- 1. Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, et al. Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 2001;57(1):127–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, et al. Fragile X premutation tremor/ataxia syndrome: molecular, clinical, and neuroimaging correlates. Am J Hum Genet 2003;72(4):869–878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Leehey MA, Berry‐Kravis E, Min SJ, et al. Progression of tremor and ataxia in male carriers of the FMR1 premutation. Mov Disord 2007;22(2):203–206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Juncos JL, Lazarus JT, Graves‐Allen E, et al. New clinical findings in the fragile X‐associated tremor ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Neurogenetics 2011;12(2):123–135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Brega AG, Goodrich G, Bennett RE, et al. The primary cognitive deficit among males with fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) is a dysexecutive syndrome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2008;30(8):853–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Grigsby J, Brega AG, Engle K, et al. Cognitive profile of fragile X premutation carriers with and without fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neuropsychology 2008;22(1):48–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Seritan AL, Nguyen DV, Farias ST, et al. Dementia in fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS): comparison with Alzheimer's disease. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2008;147B(7):1138–1144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hall DA, O'Keefe A. Fragile x‐associated tremor ataxia syndrome: the expanding clinical picture, pathophysiology, epidemiology, and update on treatment. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) 2012;2:tre‐02‐56‐352‐1. 10.7916/D8HD7TDS. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Niu YQ, Yang JC, Hall DA, et al. Parkinsonism in fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS): revisited. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014;20(4):456–459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hagerman PJ, Hagerman RJ. Fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome‐an older face of the fragile X gene. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007;3(2):107–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Soontarapornchai K, Maselli R, Fenton‐Farrell G, et al. Abnormal nerve conduction features in fragile X premutation carriers. Arch Neurol 2008;65(4):495–498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Apartis E, Blancher A, Meissner WG, et al. FXTAS: new insights and the need for revised diagnostic criteria. Neurology 2012;79(18):1898–1907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bacalman S, Farzin F, Bourgeois JA, et al. Psychiatric phenotype of the fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in males: newly described fronto‐subcortical dementia. J Clin Psychiatry 2006;67(1):87–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Seritan AL, Bourgeois JA, Schneider A, Mu Y, Hagerman RJ, Nguyen DV. Ages of onset of mood and anxiety disorders in fragile X premutation carriers. Curr Psychiatry Rev 2013;9(1):65–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bourgeois JA, Coffey SM, Rivera SM, et al. A review of fragile X premutation disorders: expanding the psychiatric perspective. J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70(6):852–862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Brunberg JA, Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, et al. Fragile X premutation carriers: characteristic MR imaging findings of adult male patients with progressive cerebellar and cognitive dysfunction. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23(10):1757–1766. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Greco CM, Hagerman RJ, Tassone F, et al. Neuronal intranuclear inclusions in a new cerebellar tremor/ataxia syndrome among fragile X carriers. Brain 2002;125(Pt 8):1760–1771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hunsaker MR, Greco CM, Spath MA, et al. Widespread non‐central nervous system organ pathology in fragile X premutation carriers with fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome and CGG knock‐in mice. Acta Neuropathol 2011;122(4):467–479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hagerman PJ, Hagerman RJ. The fragile‐X premutation: a maturing perspective. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74(5):805–816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hagerman PJ, Hagerman RJ. Fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015;1338:58–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hall DA, Birch RC, Anheim M, et al. Emerging topics in FXTAS. J Neurodev Disord 2014;6(1):31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Leehey M, Hall DA, Liu Y, Hagerman RJ. Clinical neurological phenotype of FXTAS In: Tassone F, Hall D, eds. The Fragile X‐Associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS). New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media. LLD; 2010. pp. 1‐16. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Jacquemont S, Leehey MA, Hagerman RJ, Beckett LA, Hagerman PJ. Size bias of fragile X premutation alleles in late‐onset movement disorders. J Med Genet 2006;43(10):804–809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ, Leehey MA, et al. Penetrance of the fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome in a premutation carrier population. JAMA 2004;291(4):460–469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hagerman RJ, Leavitt BR, Farzin F, et al. Fragile‐X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS) in females with the FMR1 premutation. Am J Hum Genet 2004;74(5):1051–1056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Berry‐Kravis E, Potanos K, Weinberg D, Zhou L, Goetz CG. Fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome in sisters related to X‐inactivation. Ann Neurol 2005;57(1):144–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Adams JS, Adams PE, Nguyen D, et al. Volumetric brain changes in females with fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Neurology 2007;69(9):851–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Rodriguez‐Revenga L, Pagonabarraga J, Gomez‐Anson B, et al. Motor and mental dysfunction in mother‐daughter transmitted FXTAS. Neurology 2010;75(15):1370–1376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Adams PE, Adams JS, Nguyen DV, et al. Psychological symptoms correlate with reduced hippocampal volume in fragile X premutation carriers. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010;153B(3):775–785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Tassone F, Greco CM, Hunsaker MR, et al. Neuropathological, clinical and molecular pathology in female fragile X premutation carriers with and without FXTAS. Genes Brain Behav 2012;11(5):577–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Hagerman R, Hagerman P. Advances in clinical and molecular understanding of the FMR1 premutation and fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Lancet Neurol 2013;12(8):786–798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Coffey SM, Cook K, Tartaglia N, et al. Expanded clinical phenotype of women with the FMR1 premutation. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A(8):1009–1016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Rodriguez‐Revenga L, Madrigal I, Blanch‐Rubió J, et al. Screening for the presence of FMR1 premutation alleles in women with fibromyalgia. Gene 2013;512(2):305–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Chonchaiya W, Nguyen DV, Au J, et al. Clinical involvement in daughters of men with fragile X‐associated tremor ataxia syndrome. Clin Genet 2010;78(1):38–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Cohen S, Masyn K, Adams J, et al. Molecular and imaging correlates of the fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Neurology 2006;67(8):1426–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hall DA, Robertson‐Dick EE, O'Keefe JA, Hadd AG, Zhou L, Berry‐Kravis E. X‐inactivation in the clinical phenotype of fragile X premutation carrier sisters. Neurol Genet 2016;2(1):e45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Mila M, Ramos FMI, Grupo AEGH/CIBERER . Clinical guideline of gene FMR1‐associated diseases: fragile X syndrome, primary ovarian insufficiency and tremor‐ataxia syndrome. Med Clin (Barc) 2014;142(5):219–225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Jacquemont S, Orrico A, Galli L, et al. Spastic paraparesis, cerebellar ataxia, and intention tremor: a severe variant of FXTAS? J Med Genet 2005;42(2):e14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Winarni TI, Chonchaiya W, Sumekar TA, et al. Immune‐mediated disorders among women carriers of fragile X premutation alleles. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A(10):2473–2481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Leehey MA, Legg W, Tassone F, Hagerman R. Fibromyalgia in fragile X mental retardation 1 gene premutation carriers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50(12):2233–2236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jalnapurkar I, Rafika N, Tassone F, Hagerman R. Immune mediated disorders in women with a fragile X expansion and FXTAS. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167A(1):190–197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Bourgeois JA, Seritan AL, Casillas EM, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in fragile X premutation carriers. J Clin Psychiatry 2011;72(2):175–182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cummings J, Ritter A, Rothenberg K. Advances in management of neuropsychiatric syndromes in neurodegenerative diseases. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019;21(8):79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hagerman RJ, Protic D, Rajaratnam A, Salcedo‐Arellano MJ, Aydin EY, Schneider A. Fragile X‐associated neuropsychiatric disorders (FXAND). Front Psychiatry 2018;9:564 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Leehey MA, Berry‐Kravis E, Goetz CG, Hagerman RJ. Clinical neurological phenotype of FXTAS In: Tassone F, Berry‐Kravis E, eds. The Fragile X‐Associated Tremor Ataxia Syndrome (FXTAS). New York: Springer; 2011:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Leehey MA. Fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: clinical phenotype, diagnosis, and treatment. J Invest Med 2009;57(8):830–836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale‐Third Edition: Administration and Scoring Manual. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 48. Grigsby J, Kaye K. Behavioral Dyscontrol Scale: Manual. (2nd Ed.). Ward, CO: BDS; 1996. [Google Scholar]
- 49. First MB, Williams Janet BW, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM‐IV Axis I Personality Disorders (SCID‐I), Clinician Version. Arlington, TX: American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.; 1997. [Google Scholar]
- 50. Tassone F, Pan R, Amiri K, Taylor AK, Hagerman PJ. A rapid polymerase chain reaction‐based screening method for identification of all expanded alleles of the fragile X (FMR1) gene in newborn and high‐risk populations. J Mol Diagn 2008;10(1):43–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, Gane LW, Godfrey TE, Hagerman PJ. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile‐X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66(1):6–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Iklé DN, et al. FMRP expression as a potential prognostic indicator in fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 1999;84(3):250–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Tassone F, Adams J, Berry‐Kravis EM, et al. CGG repeat length correlates with age of onset of motor signs of the fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2007;144(4):566–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Leehey MA, Berry‐Kravis E, Goetz CG, et al. FMR1 CGG repeat length predicts motor dysfunction in premutation carriers. Neurology 2008;70(16 Pt 2):1397–1402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O, Jin R, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Lifetime prevalence and age‐of‐onset distributions of DSM‐IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005;62(6):593–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kogan CS, Turk J, Hagerman RJ, Cornish KM. Impact of the Fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene premutation on neuropsychiatric functioning in adult males without fragile X‐associated Tremor/Ataxia syndrome: a controlled study. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2008;147B(6):859–872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Hall D, Todorova‐Koteva K, Pandya S, et al. Neurological and endocrine phenotypes of fragile X carrier women. Clin Genet 2016;89(1):60–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Cornish KM, Kogan CS, Li L, Turk J, Jacquemont S, Hagerman RJ. Lifespan changes in working memory in fragile X premutation males. Brain Cogn 2009;69(3):551–558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Grigsby J, Cornish K, Hocking D, et al. The cognitive neuropsychological phenotype of carriers of the FMR1 premutation. J Neurodev Disord 2014;6(1):28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Brown SS, Stanfield AC. Fragile X premutation carriers: a systematic review of neuroimaging findings. J Neurol Sci 2015;352(1–2):19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Dorn MB, Mazzocco MM, Hagerman RJ. Behavioral and psychiatric disorders in adult male carriers of fragile X. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1994;33(2):256–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Chen Y, Tassone F, Berman RF, et al. Murine hippocampal neurons expressing Fmr1 gene premutations show early developmental deficits and late degeneration. Hum Mol Genet 2010;19(1):196–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Muzar Z, Lozano R. Current research, diagnosis, and treatment of fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2014;3(4):101–109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Muzar Z, Adams PE, Schneider A, Hagerman RJ, Lozano R. Addictive substances may induce a rapid neurological deterioration in fragile X‐associated tremor ataxia syndrome: a report of two cases. Intractable Rare Dis Res 2014;3(4):162–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Martinez‐Cerdeno V, Lechpammer M, Lott A, Schneider A, Hagerman R. Fragile X‐associated tremor/ataxia syndrome in a man in His 30s. JAMA Neurol 2015;72(9):1070–1073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Muzar Z, Lozano R, Schneider A, et al. Methadone use in a male with the FMRI premutation and FXTAS. Am J Med Genet A 2015;167(6):1354–1359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1 (a) Relation of CGG repeat size and tremor age of onset. (b) Relation of CGG repeat size and ataxia age of onset.
Table S1 FXTAS criteria in FMR1 premutation sample, individual level.
