Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):e237830. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237830

Multimodality imaging in a patient with hydatid disease of the pelvic bone

Jovis Johny 1, Dhilip Andrew 1, Karthik Shyam 1,
PMCID: PMC7604880  PMID: 33127707

Description

A 50-year-old man presented to the orthopaedic outpatient department with a history of fever with chills and chronic right gluteal region swelling with sudden onset increase in size following trivial trauma. On local examination, there was localised warmth with swelling and tenderness in the right gluteal region and restricted hip movements. Routine blood investigation revealed haemoglobin of 62 g/L, total leucocyte count of 15.6×109 cells/L and raised C reactive protein.

Anteroposterior pelvic radiograph (figure 1A) demonstrated multifocal lytic lesions of the right ilium, ischium, pubis and sacral ala. Ultrasonography of the abdomen (figure 1B) demonstrated hypoechoic collection in the right iliopsoas with near total loss of muscular architecture. MRI of pelvis (figure 2A, B) demonstrated two large communicating multiseptated T2/short tau inversion recovery hyperintense collection in the right lumbar region extending into the retroperitoneal and paraspinal region which were in communication with similar lesions in the right iliac fossa and gluteal regions. Inferiorly, there was extension into the proximal thigh with few round lesions showing internal membranes. There was near total destruction of the right hip joint and iliac bone. Plain CT of the abdomen and pelvis (figure 1C–F) demonstrated multiple subcutaneous, intramuscular, intra-abdominal and pelvic isodense to hypodense collections with the retroperitoneal and subcutaneous collections showing internal fat component and rim calcification. Based on imaging findings, possibility of hydatid disease was raised, surgical excision was performed. Histopathology of the specimen revealed features of hydatid disease.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(A) Anteroposterior radiograph of pelvis demonstrates lytic lesions (white arrows) in the right ilium, ischium, pubis and acetabulum, (B) ultrasound image demonstrating hypoechoic collection in the right psoas region, (C, D) CT images demonstrating lytic lesions (white arrow) in the pelvic bone with intra-abdominal and subcutaneous isodense lesions with peripheral calcification (white arrow), (E, F) CT images demonstrate daughter cyst (white arrow).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(A) Coronal T2 fast recovery fast spin echo (FRFSE) image demonstrates daughter cyst within the cystic lesion (white arrow) and (B) sagittal T2 FRFSE image demonstrates separated membrane from the cyst wall (serpent sign) (white arrow).

Hydatid disease is a parasitic infection caused by Echinococcus granulosus,1 most commonly affecting the liver and lungs.2 Bone hydatid disease commonly involves vertebrae (30% of cases) followed by pelvis (20%).3 In bone hydatid, there is no pericyst formation with the vesicles replacing the osseous tissue and causing cortical erosion with extension into the surrounding tissue.4–6 The extraosseous part of the lesion may show calcification unlike the intraosseous part which rarely shows calcification.5 The characteristic findings of bone hydatid on a radiograph are coarsened bony trabeculae with honeycomb pattern, bone expansion with cortical thinning and soft tissue swelling with calcifications.7 Typical CT findings are multiloculated osteolytic lesions with features of bone expansion, cortical thinning and adjacent soft tissue component.1 MRI can be used in assessment of the soft tissue component, which appears as multiple vesicles showing a cyst within cyst appearance, which appears hypointense on T1 and hypo–hyperintense on T2 weighted images. The outer layer of the cyst represents pericyst which appears hypointense on T2 weighted images (rim sign), however pericysts are absent in bone hydatid. Detached membrane from cyst wall appears hypointense on all sequences (serpent sign).8

Imaging differentials include chondromyxoid fibroma, metastasis, chondrosarcoma, haemophilic pseudotumour, giant cell tumour, aneurysmal bone cyst and osteomyelitis (tuberculous). Solitary lesions can mimic simple bone cyst, plasmacytoma and brown tumour of hyperparathyroidism, while chronic hydatidosis can mimic fibrous dysplasia.9 Histopathological examination of the resected tissue is confirmatory of the diagnosis.10 Surgical excision of lesion with chemotherapy is the preferred treatment modality for bone hydatid, however advanced disease carries grave prognosis and surgery is a risky option in such cases.11

Learning points.

  • Key imaging of hydatid disease on radiograph and CT are lytic lesions with expansion of bone and thinning of cortex. Extraosseous component shows calcification.

  • On MRI, hydatid cyst appears hyperintense with hypointense wall on T2 weighted images. Separated membrane from wall produces serpent sign.

  • Key differentials for hydatid disease of bone should be kept in mind while reviewing images.

  • Travel history and endemicity are important histories to be elicited.

Footnotes

Contributors: JJ, DA and KS have drafted the article, reviewed and edited the article. All the authors have contributed equally for the article.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent for publication: Obtained.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Taori K, Sanyal R, Rathod J, et al. Ct appearances of hydatid disease at various locations. Australas Radiol 2006;50:298–305. 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2006.01588.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bel Hadj Youssef D, Loussaief C, Ben Rhomdhane F, et al. Kyste hydatique primitif intraosseux: à propos de deux cas. La Revue de Médecine Interne 2007;28:255–8. 10.1016/j.revmed.2006.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schneppenheim M, Jerosch J. Echinococcosis granulosus/cysticus of the tibia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2003;123:107–11. 10.1007/s00402-002-0461-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Torricelli P, Cristofaro RD. Radiographic and computed tomographic findings in hydatid disease of bone, 1990: 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Oğüt AG, Kanberoğlu K, Altuğ A, et al. Ct and MRI in hydatid disease of cervical vertebrae. Neuroradiology 1992;34:430–2. 10.1007/BF00596509 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Braithwaite PA, Lees RF. Vertebral hydatid disease: radiological assessment. Radiology 1981;140:763–6. 10.1148/radiology.140.3.7280247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Booz MY. The value of plain film findings in hydatid disease of bone. Clin Radiol 1993;47:265–8. 10.1016/S0009-9260(05)81136-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.García-Díez AI, Ros Mendoza LH, Villacampa VM, et al. Mri evaluation of soft tissue hydatid disease. Eur Radiol 2000;10:462–6. 10.1007/s003300050077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Morris BS, Madiwale CV, Garg A, et al. Hydatid disease of bone: a mimic of other skeletal pathologies. Australas Radiol 2002;46:431–4. 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2002.t01-1-01099.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.ÁA M, Herrera A, Cuenca J. Hydatidosis of the pelvis and hip;3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El Ibrahimi A, Ankouz A, Daoudi A, et al. Pelvic bone and hip joint hydatid disease revealing a retroperitoneal location. Orthop Rev 2009;1:8. 10.4081/or.2009.e8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES