Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Chem Soc. 2020 Jul 1;142(28):12394–12399. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c04725

Table 1.

Rhodium-Catalyzed Enantioselective Si–H Bond Insertions of Diphenyl Diazomethylenes D1–D12

graphic file with name nihms-1637472-t0006.jpg
entrya R Δσp (R-H)b product yield (%) ee (%)
1 NO2 0.78 P1 92 >99
2 CN 0.66 P2 96 98
3c CF3 0.54 P3 91 95 (S)d
4c SCF3 0.50 P4 68 97
5c OCF3 0.35 P5 66 76
6 Cl 0.28 P6 95 66
7 Br 0.23 P7 79 77
8 I 0.18 P8 62 82
9c F 0.06 P9 88 25
10 Me −0.17 P10 51 18
11 OMe −0.27 P11 47 64 (R)d
12 NMe2 −0.60 P12 45 91
a

Reaction conditions: Condition A (for entries 1–3, 6, 7, 10, and 11): diazo compound (0.2 mmol), PhMe2SiH (1.2 equiv), C2 (0.1 mol %), DCM, 0 °C. Condition B (for entries 4, 5, 8, 9, and 12): hydrazone (0.2 mmol), MnO2 (3.5 equiv), MgSO4, DCM, rt, 5–6 h; then PhMe2SiH (1.2 equiv), C2 (0.1 mol %), DCM, 0 °C. Isolated yields were given. The ee values were determined by chiral HPLC.

b

Hammett substituent constant for para substituents.

c

The ee value was determined by the corresponding alcohol obtained through the oxidation of the Si–H insertion product.

d

The absolute configuration was assigned by analogy with the reported data (see Supporting Information for details).