Table 1.
entrya | R | Δσp (R-H)b | product | yield (%) | ee (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | NO2 | 0.78 | P1 | 92 | >99 |
2 | CN | 0.66 | P2 | 96 | 98 |
3c | CF3 | 0.54 | P3 | 91 | 95 (S)d |
4c | SCF3 | 0.50 | P4 | 68 | 97 |
5c | OCF3 | 0.35 | P5 | 66 | 76 |
6 | Cl | 0.28 | P6 | 95 | 66 |
7 | Br | 0.23 | P7 | 79 | 77 |
8 | I | 0.18 | P8 | 62 | 82 |
9c | F | 0.06 | P9 | 88 | 25 |
10 | Me | −0.17 | P10 | 51 | 18 |
11 | OMe | −0.27 | P11 | 47 | 64 (R)d |
12 | NMe2 | −0.60 | P12 | 45 | 91 |
Reaction conditions: Condition A (for entries 1–3, 6, 7, 10, and 11): diazo compound (0.2 mmol), PhMe2SiH (1.2 equiv), C2 (0.1 mol %), DCM, 0 °C. Condition B (for entries 4, 5, 8, 9, and 12): hydrazone (0.2 mmol), MnO2 (3.5 equiv), MgSO4, DCM, rt, 5–6 h; then PhMe2SiH (1.2 equiv), C2 (0.1 mol %), DCM, 0 °C. Isolated yields were given. The ee values were determined by chiral HPLC.
Hammett substituent constant for para substituents.
The ee value was determined by the corresponding alcohol obtained through the oxidation of the Si–H insertion product.
The absolute configuration was assigned by analogy with the reported data (see Supporting Information for details).