Table 3.
Quantitative segmentation using proposed against U-Net [27], Attention-UNet [28], Gated-UNet [29], Dense-UNet [30], U-Net++ [31], and Inf-Net [32] supervised methods. The best two results are shown in red and blue fonts.
Segmentation methods | Quality mertics |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dice | Sensitivity | Specificity | Precision | |
U-Net [27] | 0.308 | 0.678 | 0.836 | 0.265 |
Attention-UNet [44] | 0.466 | 0.723 | 0.930 | 0.390 |
Gated-UNet [29] | 0.447 | 0.674 | 0.956 | 0.375 |
Dense-UNet [30] | 0.410 | 0.607 | 0.977 | 0.415 |
U-Net+ [31] | 0.444 | 0.877 | 0.929 | 0.369 |
Inf-Net [43] | 0.579 | 0.870 | 0.974 | 0.500 |
Seg-Net [33] | 0.705 | 0.852 | 0.954 | – |
BiSe-Net [34] | 0.706 | 0.852 | 0.852 | – |
ESP-Net [35] | 0.706 | 0.859 | 0.954 | – |
Proposed | 0.714 | 0.733 | 0.994 | 0.739 |