Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;40(10):1493–1499. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2020.10.16

2.

与其他方法的Ⅱ型错误率比较

Comparison of Type-Ⅱ error rates of different approaches

Causal PAR Approach
RareProb-M RareProb RareProb-C LBL LiMB CCRS
50
0.02 0.56% 3.16% 1.96% 58.67% 23.39% 25.35%
0.03 0.28% 2.52% 2.28% 43.03% 23.12% 38.2
0.04 0.58% 3.36% 2.24% 27.13% 22.90% 51.65%
0.05 0.54% 4.52% 2.96% 18.59% 26.16% 66.10%
60
0.02 0.73% 2.17% 1.80% 49.69% 28.31% 27.07%
0.03 0.55% 2.97% 2.43% 29.96% 26.61% 37.71%
0.04 0.62% 4.03% 2.63% 16.03% 21.63% 52.05%
0.05 0.57% 4.87% 4.07% 12.71% 26.14% 65.95%
70
0.02 0.50% 2.49% 2.06% 42.00% 26.19% 24.81%
0.03 0.51% 2.71% 1.63% 22.76% 26.20% 36.60%
0.04 0.40% 2.89% 1.03% 9.23% 25.29% 50.24%
0.05 0.47% 2.23% 1.60% 7.83% 24.93% 64.48%
80
0.02 0.35% 2.90% 1.75% 35.16% 25.35% 25.14%
0.03 0.33% 2.90% 1.48% 13.20% 26.78% 36.24%
0.04 0.39% 3.85% 1.10% 4.82% 19.20% 49.92%
0.05 0.55% 1.78% 0.68% 3.52% 21.43% 62.93%
90
0.02 0.52% 2.36% 1.13% 32.50% 24.30% 23.36%
0.03 0.48% 2.60% 0.84% 7.84% 24.71% 35.38%
0.04 0.47% 3.02% 1.36% 1.67% 22.79% 46.18%
0.05 0.54% 3.22% 1.80% 0.95% 22.81% 59.35%