Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug;7(8):682–691. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30190-5

Table 2.

Custody-specific risk factors for self-harm in prison

Studies analysed (k) Participants (n) OR (95% CI) z score p value Heterogeneity (I2)
Solitary confinement 11 410 314 5·6 (2·7–11·6) 4·6 <0·0001 98%
Violence or assault perpetration 8 276 968 3·8 (0·9–15·8) 1·8 0·068 99%
Disciplinary infractions 13 302 203 3·5 (1·2–9·7) 2·3 0·019 99%
Sexual or physical victimisation 7 9198 3·2 (2·1–4·8) 5·7 <0·0001 44%
Poor social support 3 2852 3·1 (2·0–4·8) 4·9 <0·0001 62%
Threatened with violence 5 5794 2·6 (2·0–3·3) 7·0 <0·0001 44%
No social contact or visits 5 2153 2·3 (1·5–3·5) 3·9 <0·0001 51%
Not working in prison 3 3311 1·9 (1·5–2·5) 4·8 <0·0001 18%
Single cell accommodation 5 4309 1·5 (0·8–2·9) 1·2 0·23 87%
Exposure to self-harm 4 1708 1·3 (0·5–3·6) 0·6 0·57 89%

I2 represents the percentage of variability in estimates of effect size that is attributable to between-study variation (heterogeneity). OR=odds ratio.