Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;11:557225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.557225

Table 3.

Results of the ANOVA for the flanker task RT.

Predictor df F p η2
Omnibus analysisAge Group
Flanker Congruency
Auditory Condition × Flanker Congruency
1, 38
1, 38
2, 67
55.02
418.75
3.995
<0.001
<0.001
0.027
0.59
0.92
0.095
Contrasts analysisRelaxing vs. Stimulating
Relaxing vs. Silence
Stimulating vs. Silence
1, 38
1, 38
1, 38
10.61
4.29
0.116
=0.002
=0.045
0.735
0.22
0.1
0.003