Table 1.
Examples of Various Nanoarchitecting Approaches toward Tuning the Stable Siliceous Frameworks
| Type of Tuning | Precursors | Particle Size (nm) | Outcome/Benefits | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Molecular integration | Periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) | Benzene, ethylene, ethane, 2,2′-bipyridine, thiophene, divinylbenzene, biphenyl, bis-imidazolium, among others | 20–500 nm | These organo-inorganic hybrid composites offer improved compatibility, degradability, and chemical, electronic, mechanical, magnetic, as well as optical properties. | (Asefa et al., 1999; Cho et al., 2009; Croissant et al., 2014a, 2014b, 2016a; Dinker and Kulkarni, 2016; Du et al., 2016; Grosch et al., 2015; Inagaki et al., 1999; Maegawa and Inagaki, 2015; Sayari and Wang, 2005) |
| Disulfide-bridged constructs | Bis (triethoxysilyl propyl) disulfide, (- (CH2)3-S ∼ S- (CH2)3-) | 20–350 | Enhanced GSH-triggered biodegradation through a disulfide-thiol exchange reaction. | (Croissant et al., 2014a; Du et al., 2018b; Kim et al., 2012; Quesada et al., 2013; Teng et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2003; Zhou et al., 2017) | |
| Bis (triethoxysilyl propyl)tetrasulfide (- (CH2)3-S ∼ S ∼ S ∼ S- (CH2)3-) | 30–2000 | -do- | (Wu et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2016b) | ||
| Diselenide-bridged constructs | Se-Se | ∼50 nm | Rapid GSH-triggered biodegradation over the disulfide linkage due to weaker electronegativity. | (Shao et al., 2018) | |
| Metal-impregnated mesoporous silicas | Al | – | Incorporated Al species (Al-MCM-41/Al-MCM-48) enhanced the acidity for catalysis applications. | (Aspromonte et al., 2012; Cesteros and Haller, 2001; Chen et al., 1993; Corma et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 2002; Huo et al., 2014; Kolodziejski et al., 1993; Monnier et al., 1993; Ryoo et al., 1997) | |
| Cu | ∼100 | Offered pH-responsive release and degradation of MSNs. | (Kankala et al., 2015, 2017, 2020b; Kuthati et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019) | ||
| Fe | 50–150 | Facilitated the unique chemical coordination-accelerated biodegradation. | (Wang et al., 2017) | ||
| Co, Fe, Ni | – | Influenced the adsorption capacity, activity, and stability of the catalysts. | (Parvulescu and Su, 2001) | ||
| Zn | ∼100 | Offered pH-responsive release of therapeutic guests in MSNs. | (Kankala et al., 2020a, 2020c) | ||
| Shaping | Janus-type architectures | Gold, platinum, upconverting nanoparticles (UCNPs), iron oxide, and first-row-transition metal species | 30–300 | Metal-associated asymmetric shaped constructs with well-defined particle sizes showed improved magnetic, electrical, and optical, as well as mobility characteristics. | (Abbaraju et al., 2017; Karimi et al., 2017; Li et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2015; Shao et al., 2016; Ujiie et al., 2015; Villalonga et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019c; Xuan et al., 2016) |
| Multi-podal/multi-compartment architectures | Ethyl acetate, mixed organosilane precursors | 100–200 | Multi-compartment nanocontainers offered selective drug adsorption for multidrug delivery. | (Croissant et al., 2015a; Suteewong et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2019) | |
| Flower-shaped packing/dendritic/radially porous designs | Adding cosolvents (diethyl ether, pentanol) and utilizing catalysts (triethanolamine, reduced ammonia), 4-mercaptophenylacetic acid, poly (acrylic acid), and altered emulsion components ratio | 50–200 | Center-wide radial porous channels offered improved encapsulation of large-sized therapeutic molecules. | (Das et al., 2019; Du and Qiao, 2015; Gao et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2013, 2019a, 2019b; Xu et al., 2015; Zheng et al., 2018) | |
| Dynamic modulation | Deformable solids | PMO (thioether/benzene/ethane-bridged)-based siliceous shells | 50–200 | Enriched the cellular internalization by changing their overall morphology (spherical-to-oval) during the mechanical inner stress. | (Teng et al., 2018) |