Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 1;7(1):e000439. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2020-000439

Table 3.

Adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) using different cut-points for low AMH values

AMH <1.0 ng/mL AMH below 25th percentile*
Model 1† Model 2‡ Model 1† Model 2‡
PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI) PR (95% CI)
SLE/CYC− vs comparison 1.68 (0.97 to 2.91) 1.62 (0.93 to 2.82) 1.55 (0.97 to 2.47) 1.55 (0.97 to 2.47)
SLE/CYC+ vs comparison 2.90 (1.45 to 5.78) 2.90 (1.29 to 6.51) 2.66 (1.59 to 4.45) 2.43 (1.40 to 4.22)
SLE/CYC+ vs SLE/CYC− 1.72 (0.91 to 3.24) 1.79 (0.81 to 3.95) 1.72 (1.09 to 2.70) 1.57 (0.94 to 2.61)

*25th percentile cut-point categories were assigned separately for those aged 22–34 and 35–40 years.

†Adjusting for age at interview (continuous).

‡Adjusting for age at interview (continuous), body mass index (underweight: <18.5 kg/m2, normal weight: 18.5–<25 kg/m2, overweight: 25–<30 kg/m2 and obese: ≥30 kg/m2) and hormonal contraception in the previous 12 months.

AMH, anti-Müllerian hormone; CYC, cyclophosphamide.