Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 8;184(3):1348–1362. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00832

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Phenotyping of overexpressing WHY2 (oeWHY2), WHY2 knockout (why2), and complemented WHY2 (comWHY2) lines. A, Scheme of oeWHY2, why2, and comWHY2 constructs. B, Observation of rosette leaf senescence of the oeWHY2, why2, comWHY2, and wild type (WT) lines. C, Senescence leaf ratio in the oeWHY2, why2, comWHY2, and wild-type lines. D, Chlorophyll content in the oeWHY2, why2, comWHY2, and wild-type lines. E, Observation of silique development and seed size in the oeWHY2, why2, comWHY2, and wild-type lines; seed size represents the length of five seeds, with why2 lines >2 mm, and wild type and oeWHY2 line ≤2 mm. F, Calculation of rosette size (diameter), silique size (width and length), and seed weight (weight per 100 seeds) in the oeWHY2, why2, comWHY2, and wild-type lines. Error bars represent the sd of triplicates. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences from the wild type, calculated using Student’s t test: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01. Orange colum indicates increasing; blue column indicates decreasing.