Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019 Apr 23;12(2):87–94. doi: 10.1007/s12265-019-09876-3

Table 1.

Summary of preclinical studies of acute mechanical left ventricular support devices to reduce infarct size

Animal Model Year Duration of Ischemia (min) Duration of Reperfusion (min) Mechanical Support Before or After Reperfusion Occluded Vessel Method of Occlusion Device Reduction in Infarct Size? Reference
Canine 1978 480 X Before LAD Ligation IABP Yes Roberts & Gay [6]
Baboons 1979 1440 X Before LAD Ligation IABP No Haston & McNamara [7]
Porcine 1980 1440 X Before LAD Ligation IABP No Laas & Replogle [8]
Porcine 2008 60 240 Before vs After LAD Ligation IABP Yes / No Ledoux & Smalling [9]
Canine 1983 240 X Before LAD Ligation LA-FA Bypass Yes Catinella & Spencer [12]
Porcine 2013 120 120 Before LAD Balloon angioplasty TandemHeart Yes Kapur & Karas [13]
Canine 1989 120 60 Before LAD Ligation Hemopump Yes Merhige & Wampler [14]
Canine 1992 120 60 Before LAD Snare ligation Hemopump/IABP Yes Smalling & Amirian [15]
Canine 2005 120 240 Before vs After LAD Snare ligation Hemopump Yes / No Achour & Smalling [16]
Sheep 2003 60 120 Before vs After LAD Ligation Impella 5.0 Yes Meyns & Flameng [17]
Porcine 2015 90 120 Before LAD Balloon angioplasty Impella CP Yes Kapur & Karas [18]
Porcine 2015 120 120 Before LCx Ligation Impella LD Yes Sun & Wang [20]
Porcine 2018 90 120 Before LAD Balloon angioplasty Impella CP Yes Esposito & Kapur [21]
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure