Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun;20(2):841–848. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v20i2.38

Table 1:

Distribution of DK at the time of T1DM diagnosis during the study period (2000–2017) according to age and gender.

First period (2000–2005)
n =45
Second period (2006–2011)
n =48
Third period (2012–2017)
n =80
Whole period (2000–2017)
n =173
P value (trend)
n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI n (%) 95% CI
Total (n=173) 45 (26.0%) - 48 (27.7%) - 80 (46.3%) - 173 (100%) - 0.01*
Gender
Boys 21 (46.7%) 42.9–50.4 23 (47.9%) 44.2–51.7 36 (45.0%) 41.3–48.8 80 (46.2%) 42.5–50.0 0.94
Girls 24 (53.3%) 49.6–57.0 25 (52.5%) 49.3–56.9 44 (55.0%) 51.5–58.9 93 (53.8%) 50.1–57.5 0.94
Age
Group 1 (0–4 years) 13 (28.9%) 25.1–32.5 13 (27.1%) 23.4–30.8 24 (30.0%) 26.4–33.9 50 (28.9%) 25.3–32.6 0.24
Group 2 (5 – 9 year) 26 (57.8%) 54.1–61.6 28 (58.3%) 54.6–62.2 43 (53.75%) 50.2–57.8 97 (56.1%) 52.4–59.7 0.26
Group 3 (10–15 years) 6 (13.3%) 9.7–17.2 7 (14.6%) 10.9–18.5 13 (16.25%) 12.7–20.0 26 (15.0%) 11.3–18.8 0.12

Chi-square was used to calculate p value (Fisher exact test was used when sample size less than 5).

*

: Significant (P<0.05).

a: significant compared to Group 2 (P<0.05).

b: significant compared to Group 2 (P<0.01).