Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;28(10):1331–1340. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-0648-2

Table 2.

Statements regarding perceived benefits of and barriers against ECS and freedom-of-choice statements.

Parentsa Relativesb Referencec
n = 58 n = 101 n = 781
% % % p
A. Perceived benefits of ECS
Offering the carrier test avoids much suffering for the entire family 88 86 68 <0.001
The carrier test can avoid suffering for future parents 86 86 67 <0.001
The carrier test can prevent costs for the family 52 57 57 0.702
The carrier test can prevent costs for the society 60 59 49 0.045
The results of a carrier test can help in choosing a partner 3 11 7 0.211
B. Perceived barriers against ECS
The carrier test creates too high expectations of the birth of a healthy child 35 34 44 0.068
Offering a carrier test leads to anxiety 19 21 39 <0.001
The carrier test will be the first step in developing a perfect child 16 20 32 0.003
Offering the carrier test can cause people to feel forced to undergo testing 7 16 29 <0.001
I am afraid of discrimination by carriers (for instance, by insurance companies and the social environment) 12 11 23 0.003
C. Freedom-of-choice statements
The carrier test should be offered to every couple that wants to have children 66 65 55 0.052
Every couple that wants to have children must take the carrier test 35 39 22 <0.001

Questionnaire part III: Agreement on statements.

Significant differences at p < 0.05 are printed in bold.

aIndividual parents (mothers and fathers) of MPS III patients, both deceased and alive.

bFirst and second degree family members of MPS III patients.

cReproductive-aged people from the general Dutch population [19].