Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;32(1):14. doi: 10.1007/s00138-020-01128-8

Table 8.

Comparison with SOTA approaches (Unit: %)

Approach η1 η2 η3 η4 η5 η6
RBFNN [6] 67.08 74.48 72.52 70.78 69.64 41.74
K-ELM [7] 57.29 61.46 59.83 59.38 58.46 18.81
ELM-BA [8] 57.08 ± 3.86 72.40 ± 3.03 67.48 ± 1.65 64.74 ± 1.26 61.75 ± 2.24 29.90 ± 2.45
6L-CNN-F [9] 81.04 ± 2.90 79.27 ± 2.21 79.70 ± 1.27 80.16 ± 0.85 80.31 ± 1.13 60.42 ± 1.73
GoogLeNet [10] 76.88 ± 3.92 83.96 ± 2.29 82.84 ± 1.58 80.42 ± 1.40 79.65 ± 1.92 61.10 ± 2.62
ResNet-18 [11] 78.96 ± 2.90 89.48 ± 1.64 88.30 ± 1.50 84.22 ± 1.23 83.31 ± 1.53 68.89 ± 2.33

5L-DCNN-SP-C

(Ours)

93.28 ± 1.50 94.00 ± 1.56 93.96 ± 1.54 93.64 ± 1.42 93.62 ± 1.42 87.29 ± 2.83