Table 8.
Comparison with SOTA approaches (Unit: %)
Approach | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBFNN [6] | 67.08 | 74.48 | 72.52 | 70.78 | 69.64 | 41.74 |
K-ELM [7] | 57.29 | 61.46 | 59.83 | 59.38 | 58.46 | 18.81 |
ELM-BA [8] | 57.08 ± 3.86 | 72.40 ± 3.03 | 67.48 ± 1.65 | 64.74 ± 1.26 | 61.75 ± 2.24 | 29.90 ± 2.45 |
6L-CNN-F [9] | 81.04 ± 2.90 | 79.27 ± 2.21 | 79.70 ± 1.27 | 80.16 ± 0.85 | 80.31 ± 1.13 | 60.42 ± 1.73 |
GoogLeNet [10] | 76.88 ± 3.92 | 83.96 ± 2.29 | 82.84 ± 1.58 | 80.42 ± 1.40 | 79.65 ± 1.92 | 61.10 ± 2.62 |
ResNet-18 [11] | 78.96 ± 2.90 | 89.48 ± 1.64 | 88.30 ± 1.50 | 84.22 ± 1.23 | 83.31 ± 1.53 | 68.89 ± 2.33 |
5L-DCNN-SP-C (Ours) |
93.28 ± 1.50 | 94.00 ± 1.56 | 93.96 ± 1.54 | 93.64 ± 1.42 | 93.62 ± 1.42 | 87.29 ± 2.83 |