Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;51(5):2727–2739. doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01997-6

Table 6.

Performance of GBM in the prediction of recovered and active cases in Maharashtra, India

Performance parameter Distribution
Gamma Quintile Poisson Laplace Huber Tweedie Gaussian
Recovered cases
  MSE 21,005.42 24,869.43 691.80 25,379.27 21,081.05 7094.25 3889.94
  RMSE 144.93 157.70 26.30 159.30 145.19 84.22 62.36
  MAE 102.83 89.67 18.27 96.70 68.90 44.64 39.55
  MRD 12.17 44.83 −1975.29 96.70 9993.07 2.58 3889.94
  R2 0.52 0.43 0.98 0.42 0.52 0.84 0.91
Active cases
  MSE 816,125.8 1,572,996 643,718.7 613,581.1 271,677.3 201,587.4 109,033.4
  RMSE 903.39 1254.19 802.32 783.31 521.22 448.98 330.2021
  MAE 599.62 891.48 344.46 545.42 355.50 280.64 252.3535
  MRD 16.74 445.74 −21,429.08 545.42 154,812.5 9.82 109,033.4
  R2 0.56 0.16 0.65 0.67 0.85 0.89 0.94

Note: R2 (coefficient of determination), MSE (mean square error), RMSE (root mean square error), MAE (mean average error), and MRD (mean residual deviance)