Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;10:18955. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75861-5

Table 1.

Comparison between the three groups of participants before and after the tDCS treatment on the outcome measures.

Variable 5-days 10-days Sham ANOVA
Before After Before Aafter Before After Groups (5-days vs 10-days vs sham) Times (before vs after treatment) Interaction between groups and times
Pain 7.00 (1.73) 5.05 (2.49) 5.72 (1.56) 5.22 (3.35) 7.09 (1.61) 4.82 (3.34)

p = 0.792

η2 = 0.017

p = 0.008

η2 = 0.223

p = 0.417

η2 = 0.061

Frontal alpha 2 1.07 (3.30) − 0.24* (3.51) 1.67 (2.41) 1.80 (3.07) 1.95 (2.79) 2.92 (3.62)

p = 0.297

η2 = 0.083

p = 0.854

η2 = 0.001

p = 0.040*

η2 = 0.261

Parietal alpha 2 3.77 (3.14) 2.00* (3.63) 5.31 (2.79) 5.76 (4.07) 2.82 (4.74) 4.19 (5.10)

p = 0.302

η2 = 0.082

p = 0.964

η2 = 0.001

p = 0.014*

η2 = 0.261

Occipital alpha 2 6.15 (2.99) 4.35 (3.31) 5.80 (3.57) 5.99 (4.27) 6.20 (5.23) 7.20 (4.86)

p = 0.680

η2 = 0.027

p = 0.716

η2 = 0.005

p = 0.104

η2 = 0.149

Values are presented as a function of means and standard deviations. For ANOVAs, p and η2 values are presented for the main factors (times and groups) and for the interaction between them. *Post hoc analyzes indicated a decrease in spectral power in frontal and parietal regions after the application of the 5-days tDCS protocol. Level of significance considered was of p < 0.05. SD Standard deviation; η2: Partial eta-squared as a measure of size effect.