Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;10:18933. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76001-9

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Self and ingroup associative matching paradigm. A schematic representation of the matching task that was utilised across all three experiments. The shape-label pairings were always counterbalanced across participants. After a short learning phase of the initial shape-label associations, participants responded to randomly presented shape-label pairs shown on-screen as matched or mismatched by pressing assigned response keys. In Experiment 1, the personal (you and stranger) associations were made in a separate task to the group (ingroup and outgroup) associations and order of tasks were counterbalanced. In Experiment 2, all of the associations (personal and group) were learned and presented in the same blocks of the same tasks. In Experiment 3, the associations were learned as part of one task, but were presented and responded to in alternating blocks. Two shapes were associated with each label in Experiments 1 and 3 (as shown in the figure), but only one shape was associated with each label in Experiment 2.