Table 5.

Assessment tools used in opioid overdose response training.

	# of studies		# of studies
OOKS	11	Critical Task Assessment	4
OOAS	8	Checklist	3
BOOK	2	Naloxone Assembly and Administration and/or Simulation Scenario Completion Time	7
BORRA	2
Perceived Competence Scale	1
Non-validated Tool
Knowledge/Recognition	7
Confidence/Self-Efficacy	4
Attitude/Comfort	4

The use of each assessment tool in the overdose response training studies is based on the following; OOKS (Wagner et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2018, Heavey et al., 2018, Williams et al., 2014, Giordano et al., 2020, Kwon et al., 2020, Monteiro et al., 2017, Dietze et al., 2018, Klimas et al., 2015, Petterson and Madah-Amiri, 2017, Berland et al., 2017), OOAS (Klimas et al., 2015, Berland et al., 2017, Wagner et al., 2016, Zhang et al., 2018, Heavey et al., 2018, Williams et al., 2014, Giordano et al., 2020, Kwon et al., 2020), BOOK (Bergeria et al., 2019, Huhn et al., 2018), BORRA (Saucier et al., 2016, Behar et al., 2015), Perceived Competence Scale (Ashrafioun et al., 2016), non-validated knowledge tool (Dion, 2016, Pade et al., 2017, Ashrafioun et al., 2016, Crocker et al., 2019, Dahlem et al., 2017, Hargraves et al., 2019, Pietrusza et al., 2018), non-validated confidence/self-efficacy tool (Saucier et al., 2016, Crocker et al., 2019, Hargraves et al., 2019, Kwon et al., 2020), non-validated attitude/comfort tool (Pade et al., 2017, Saucier et al., 2016, Behar et al., 2015, Hargraves et al., 2019). The use of each assessment tool in the simulation studies is based on the following; Critical Task Assessment (Krieter et al., 2016, Edwards et al., 2015, Eggleston et al., 2018, Eggleston et al., 2019), Checklist (Franko et al., 2019, Kobayashi et al., 2017, Kim et al., 2016), Naloxone Administration Time (Goldberg et al., 2018, McDermott and Collins, 2012), and five studies included Naloxone Administration Time as a secondary measure (Kobayashi et al., 2017, Edwards et al., 2015, Eggleston et al., 2018, Eggleston et al., 2019, Franko et al., 2019).