Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Genet. 2020 Apr 13;52(5):534–540. doi: 10.1038/s41588-020-0612-7

Extended Data Fig. 9. Comparison of SNP- and k-mer-based GWAS in tomato.

Extended Data Fig. 9

(A) Histogram of k-mers allele counts for tomato accessions.

(B) Histogram of difference between threshold values of SNPs and k-mers for tomato phenotypes.

(C) Histogram of the top SNP p-value divided by the k-mers defined threshold, in -log10, for tomato phenotypes. Plotted for phenotypes with only identified SNPs (upper panel) or for phenotypes with both SNPs and k-mers identified (lower panel).

(D) Histogram of the difference between top (-log10) p-values in the two methods for tomato phenotypes.

(E) Histogram of the number of identified k-mers vs. identified SNPs for tomato phenotypes.