Abstract
The transition from adolescence into adulthood is a period when ongoing brain development coincides with a substantially increased risk of psychiatric disorders. The developmental brain changes accounting for this emergent psychiatric symptomatology remain obscure. Capitalising on a unique longitudinal dataset that includes in-vivo myelin-sensitive magnetization transfer (MT) MRI, we show that this developmental period is characterised by brain-wide growth in MT, within both gray matter and adjacent juxta-cortical white matter. In this healthy population the expression of common developmental traits, namely compulsivity and impulsivity, is tied to a reduced growth of these MT trajectories in fronto-striatal regions. This reduction is most marked in dorsomedial and dorsolateral prefrontal regions for compulsivity, and in lateral and medial prefrontal regions for impulsivity. The findings highlight that psychiatric traits of compulsivity and impulsivity are linked to regionally specific reduction in myelin-related growth in late adolescent brain development.
Introduction
Structural brain development extends into adulthood, particularly so in regions that mediate higher cognition such as prefrontal cortex1. A canonical view is that this maturation is characterised by regional shrinkage in gray matter (GM) coupled to an expansion of white matter (WM)2. However, the underlying microstructural processes remain obscure. Two candidate mechanisms are proposed3, namely synaptic loss (pruning) that reduces supernumerary connections, and an increase in myelination that serves to enhance communication efficiency. Both accounts receive a degree of support from cross-sectional and ex-vivo studies4–7. What is also known is that there are substantial inter-individual differences in these growth trajectories8, with the most marked changes occurring within an age window where an emergence of psychiatric illness is increasingly common9,10. This raises a possibility that this enhanced psychiatric risk is tied to altered maturational brain trajectories during this critical developmental period11,12.
Compulsivity and impulsivity are two important symptom dimensions in psychiatry13 that also show substantial variation in expression within a healthy population (Supplementary Fig. 1a-f). At the extreme these axes can manifest as obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) respectively. Macrostructural and cross-sectional studies suggest a link to changes in fronto-striatal regions13–16, but leave unanswered the question of whether compulsivity and impulsivity reflect consequences of altered developmental microstructural processes.
Here we used semi-quantitative structural MRI17 to investigate the microstructural brain development during a transition into adulthood, specifically asking whether individual variability in these developmental brain trajectories is linked to the expression of compulsive and impulsive traits. We used a novel magnetic transfer saturation (MT) imaging protocol to provide an in-vivo marker for macromolecules, in particular myelin18,19. Importantly, MT saturation has been shown to be a more direct reflection of myelin compared to other imaging protocols, such as magnetization transfer ratio20,21. It is also sensitive to developmental effects7. This renders it ideal for tracking patterns of brain maturation in longitudinal studies involving repeated scanning of participants, a crucial necessity for a full characterisation of development22. Using such a protocol, we show that during late adolescence and early adulthood cingulate cortex expresses the greatest myelin-related growth, both within gray and adjacent white matter. Individual differences in compulsivity are reflected in a reduced rate of this growth particularly within dorsomedial and dorsolateral frontal regions. This contrasted with impulsivity, which was associated with reduced myelin-related growth in lateral and medial prefrontal cortex. Our results suggest that within an otherwise healthy population heterogeneity, compulsivity and impulsivity traits reflect regionally distinct differential growth in myelin growth trajectories.
Results
Ongoing myelin-related growth at the edge of adulthood
To assess developmental trajectories of myelin-sensitive MT we exploited an accelerated longitudinal design that included repeated scanning in 288 (149 female) adolescents and young adults aged 14–24 years, up to three times in all, with an average follow-up time of 1.3±0.32 years (mean±SD) (1 scan: N=100, 2 scans: N=167, 3 scans: N=21). The sample was gender balanced and comprised of otherwise healthy subjects (excluding self-reported illness a priori to avoid illness-related confounds, such as medication effects) who were selected to be approximately representative of the population (cf online methods for details).
Examining individual, ongoing maturation using whole-brain voxel-based quantification analyses (Supplementary Fig. 2a-b) in gray matter revealed a brain-wide increase in myelin-related MT, with a strong emphasis within cingulate, prefrontal and temporo-parietal areas (Fig. 1a, p<.05 false-discovery rate [FDR] peak corrected; merging cross-sectional and longitudinal effects, mean change in GM (±SD): 0.58±0.19% per year; max z-value voxel [z=6.78, p<.002 FDR] in right angular gyrus [MNI: 51 -46 44]: 0.98% per year; cf. Supplementary Table 1 for parametric and non-parametric results; separate cross-sectional and longitudinal effects shown in Supplementary Fig. 3a-b). These developmental changes were accompanied by increased MT in adjacent (juxta-cortical) superficial white matter with a similar topography to that seen in gray matter (Fig. 1b, mean change: 0.47±0.18% per year; max z-value voxel [z=6.18, p<.004 FDR] in posterior cingulate [5 -58 56] with 0.89% per year; cf. Supplementary Table 1), consistent with the idea that connections within gray and white matter are myelinated in concert (correlation between neighbouring gray-/white-matter voxels: Pearson r=0.25, permutation p<0.001; cf. online methods). Similar, albeit less pronounced, microstructural maturation was observed in subcortical gray matter nuclei including amygdala, ventral and posterior striatum, pallidum and dorsal thalamus (Fig. 1c, mean change: 0.29±0.06% per year; max z-value voxel [z=5.12, p<.004 FDR] in amygdala [25 4 -23] with 0.5% per year). These findings highlight that myelin-related MT development in both cortical and subcortical areas is a marked feature of a transition from adolescence into adulthood, and conforms to a pattern that is suggestive of involvement of both local and inter-regional fibre projections.
Association between macro- and microstructural development
The observed developmental expansion of myelin-sensitive MT expressed overlapping topographies with macrostructural gray matter shrinkage (with the exception of hippocampus) and white matter expansion (Fig. 2a; Supplementary Fig. 4a-c and Supplementary Table 2 for macrostructural results). This raises a question as to how precisely macrostructural volume change relates to development of our myelin marker MT. A positive association in white matter volume (Fig. 2b-c; mean±SD: r=0.09±0.05, t=453, p<e-15) supports the notion that myelination is linked to the observed macrostructural volume changes, as predicted by an assumption that increased myelination leads to a white matter volume expansion23. The relatively modest, but consistent, effect size is partially explained on the basis that we only investigate the purely developmental associations and controlled for potentially confounding effects. However, our findings leave open a possibility that there might be additional microstructural factors driving the change in white matter macrostructure.
Voxel-wise analysis in gray matter revealed a more complex association between macrostructural development and myelination (Fig. 2b-c). We observed that the association is dependent on where a voxel is located in the tissue. An overall profile of consistently negative correlations (albeit relatively small) in gray matter zones close to the white matter boundary (0-2mm from GM/WM border: t=300, p<e-15) suggest that developmental myelination may lead to a ‘whitening’ of gray matter, which in turn is likely to drive partial volume effects evident in a shrinkage of gray matter volume23,24. This means that a gray matter volume decline in deep layers during adolescence may well be driven by an increase in myelination within these same areas. This negative association was reduced with increased distance from the white matter boundary (Pearson r=0.3, p<e-15, Fig. 2c, bottom right panel). This suggests that ongoing myelination in superficial layers (i.e. close to the outer surface of the brain) contributes to an attenuated volume reduction and implies that developmental macrostructural change is the result of complex microstructural processes.
Compulsivity linked to reduced development in cingulate, dorsolateral and striatal MT
We next asked whether individual differences in the expression of symptoms, indicative of obsessive-compulsive traits, were associated with distinct developmental trajectories in myelin-sensitive MT growth. We employed a dimensional approach exploiting a heterogeneity within this otherwise healthy community sample. We computed a compound-score (first principal component, Supplementary Fig. 1a-f) from the two established obsessive-compulsive symptom questionnaires25,26 available in our sample in order to aggregate a common score to index meaningful variation (cf. Supplementary Fig. 1). Top loading items on this score (subsequently called ‘compulsivity’) reflect compulsive behaviours, such as checking, and it was strongly aligned with total scores on our obsessive-compulsive questionnaires (Pearson correlations r>.8).
Assessing how compulsivity related to individual myelination over time, we found our compulsive measure was linked to altered MT growth primarily in frontal areas, with significant clusters in dorsolateral (superior frontal gyrus, GM: z=4.87, p=.009 FDR, [-23 34 49], WM: z=4.28, p<.05 FDR, [-24 -4 64]) and dorsomedial (anterior mid-cingulate, GM: z=4.1, p=.009 FDR, [18 1 58], WM: z=3.74, p<.05 FDR, [-25 1 37]) frontal cortices (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Table 3), both in cortical gray and adjacent superficial white matter. Importantly, more compulsive subjects showed reduced MT growth compared to less compulsive subjects. A similar pattern was seen in the left ventral striatum (z=3.9, p=.018 FDR, [-22 14 -9]) and adjacent white matter (z=4.2, p=.027 FDR, [21 -9 25], Fig. 3b). Intriguingly, the locations of reduced MT development were spatially centred in cingulate and ventral striatum, and this regional focus aligns with a specific fronto-striatal loop described in primate anatomical tracing27 studies. This alignment with a well described anatomical circuit suggests compulsivity may relate to attenuated myelin-related developmental growth in this cingulate-striatal loop13.
Reduced inferior prefrontal maturation trajectories in impulsivity
We next examined whether a common heterogeneity in impulsivity (as assessed using the well-established Barratt impulsiveness questionnaire total score; cf Supplementary Fig. 1f) is linked to individual growth of the myelin marker. In examining this linkage we opted to use a questionnaire measure over task-based measures of impulsivity because the former have been found to be more reliable (cf 28–32 for detailed discussion; stability subsample in this study33 [N=63], BIS total: re-test reliability Pearson r=.76 for 1 year follow-up, reflection impulsivity decision parameter34: r=.16 for 6 months follow-up), reflecting a stable trait more likely to be linked to structural development. We found impulsivity was associated with reduction in adolescent MT growth with a strong focus on frontal areas, encompassing lateral (including inferior frontal gyrus, IFG; GM: z=1.65, p=.031 FDR, [-48 13 -4], WM: z=4.38, p=.015 FDR, [-27 39 -2]) and medial prefrontal areas (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Table 4; GM: z=4.13, p=.031, [15 58 18], WM: z=3.69, p=.015, [-12 47 20]), both within gray and adjacent white matter (subcortical effects in Supplementary Fig. 5a).
The above finding suggests that while impulsivity and compulsivity are both linked to reduced myelin-related growth in prefrontal areas, these alterations have their peak expression in distinct anatomical regions (cingulate and dorsolateral vs inferior later and medial prefrontal cortex, for direct comparison cf. Supplementary Fig. 6). Interestingly, both compulsivity and impulsivity showed a reduced growth in the anterior insula (Supplementary Fig. 6), possibly expressing a common, transdiagnostic vulnerability.
We next investigated development-independent levels of myelination in impulsivity, indicating myelin-related differences that emerged before the commencement of our study. This is important because a pre-existing ‘hyper-myelination’ with the reduced ongoing growth would suggest a normalisation during adolescence, whereas a ‘hypo-myelination’ prior to adolescence onset would imply that a deficient myelination was further accentuated during adolescence. We found a main effect of impulsivity evident in hypo-myelination across several, primarily anterior prefrontal, brain areas including IFG (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Figure 5b, Supplementary Table 5). An overlap between these baseline effects and areas showing a reduced ongoing growth suggests that for impulsivity a gap in myelination may exist prior to adolescence, with this gap is widening further during a transition into adulthood. The same effects were found when analysing across the entire prefrontal cortex, where a reduced MT growth was linked to both compulsivity (t(421)=1.99, p=.047) and impulsivity (t(421)=-2.80, p=.005), but where a developmental, baseline hypo-myelination in impulsivity (t(474)=2.30, p=.022) is further accentuated during late adolescent development (no such effect was found for compulsivity: t(427)=1.03, p=.30, Supplementary Figure 7a-b).
Lastly, we examined how MT change related to the development of impulsivity traits. Although we did not see age-related change in impulsivity across the entire group, there was substantial variability within individuals (cf. Supplementary Fig. 1). We thus investigated whether myelin growth in IFG, a key region previously implicated in impulsivity15, related to ongoing changes in impulsivity. We found that a change in IFG MT was negatively associated with impulsivity change (Pearson r=-.27, p<.0003, Fig. 4d), indicating that individuals with the least ongoing myelin growth had a worsening impulsivity over the course of the study (irrespective of other covariates, such as baseline impulsivity or age). Similar effects were also seen in prefrontal cortex when using a voxel-wise analysis (cf. Supplementary Figure 7c).
Discussion
Myelin enables fast and reliable communication within, and between, neuronal populations35,36. Using a longitudinal, repeated-measures, MRI scanning design in a developmental sample, we provide in-vivo evidence that myelination extends into adulthood as evident in a pronounced myelin-related whole-brain MT growth. We find that the macrostructural growth pattern closely resembles that expressed in our myelin marker. The positive association between these measures in white matter suggests that macrostructural volume change is, at least in part, driven by myelination. In gray matter, depth-dependent associations suggest that macrostructural volume reduction in adolescence is the result of multiple microstructural processes. In superficial layers, ongoing myelination seems to attenuate the impact of a pruning effect, leading to an apparent slowing in gray matter volume decline. In deeper layers, close to the gray-white matter boundary, ongoing myelination appears to contribute to an inflated estimate of volume reduction, with a myelin-induced ‘whitening’ of gray matter resulting in a misclassification of gray matter voxels (i.e. partial volume effects23), leading to an apparent volume reduction. This observation extends on recent cross-sectional studies that report age-related myelin increases in deep layers7,24 and implies that developmental neuroimaging that avail of markers sensitive to specific microstructural processes17 can provide more precise accounts of the likely mechanisms underlying adolescent and early adult brain development.
Critically, we found that individual differences in myelin-related MT growth during development is linked to common heterogeneity in compulsivity and impulsivity within an otherwise healthy sample. Both compulsivity and impulsivity were associated with a reduction in MT growth, and this reduction was almost exclusively present in fronto-striatal areas. In compulsivity, MT growth reduction was primarily expressed in dorsomedial and dorsolateral frontal regions as well as ventral striatum, whereas impulsivity was more tightly linked to reduction in lateral and medial prefrontal growth. It is worth noting that variability in compulsivity/impulsivity does not reflect clinical impairment in this healthy sample37. Our findings extend on previous animal and patient studies that implicate lateral and medial prefrontal regions in attention-related functions38 and ADHD15,39. It is also noteworthy that the regions implicated in compulsivity are reported to show altered function in OCD40,41 and constitute prime targets for invasive OCD treatment interventions42,43. Critically, our findings of a reduced myelin growth linked to compulsivity suggest that differences in brain structural variables may not prevail during childhood (or only to a minor extent), but emerge during adolescence as a result of aberrant developmental processes.
Embracing a longitudinal developmental approach, as in this study, poses distinct developmental questions. In relation to impulsivity and compulsivity, we can ask how a stable trait is related to longitudinal change as well as baseline myelination differences, where the latter is more indicative of influences emerging prior to recruitment into our study. In the case of impulsivity, we found that ongoing growth occurred in similar regions that also express a difference in baseline myelination, advocating the presence of a pre-existing myelination gap in impulsivity that further expands during adolescence. This suggests that the mechanisms underlying impulsivity have long-lasting effects on brain development, possibly affecting myelination trajectories before adolescence onset with lasting effects into adulthood.
An extension of the approach outlined above poses the question as to how ongoing change in compulsivity and impulsivity relate to ongoing brain maturation (i.e. correlated change). Strikingly, we found that IFG growth change was indicative of change in impulsivity. Subjects who showed worsening of their impulsivity were also those who showed the least maturational myelin-related growth in IFG. Thus, during the transition into early adulthood even though impulsivity traits as a whole do not change at a population level, individual psychiatric risk trajectories show meaningful variation, and this in turn is reflected in specific patterns of brain maturation.
In our study, we adopted a broad definition of impulsivity and compulsivity traits yet found links to myelin growth. This suggests reduced myelin-related growth in these areas may represent a developmental feature shared across multiple cognitive and/or genetic endophenotypes. This also implies that a more refined cognitive endophenotyping might yield spatially more defined developmental effects44–46. Compulsivity and impulsivity showed little overlap in our sample and this relative independence was also reflected in their impact on distinct fronto-striatal brain regions (with the exception of insula which showed a common growth reduction). These data leave open the possibility of a genetic pleiotropy, meaning that a shared genetic factor may drive both myelination and impulsivity/compulsivity, without a direct causal influence between brain and trait expression47. However, our correlated change finding that ongoing myelination in the IFG is directly related to how impulsivity evolves over time advocates for the possibility of a direct relationship between myelin-related maturation and impulsivity.
Variability in trait dimensions, such as compulsivity and impulsivity are often related to other variables known to affect brain structure. We examined how potential confounding factors, such as subject movement during scanning (Supplementary Figure 8a-f), alcohol consumption45,46, recreational drug use, socio-economic status, intelligence (between subject differences and within-subject changes, Supplementary Fig. 9a-c) or ethnicity affected the link between compulsivity/impulsivity and MT growth. Importantly, none of these factors accounted for the observed effects (Supplementary Figure 9d).
A challenge for human neuroscience is to determine the cellular mechanisms that underlie macrostructural change in-vivo 48. This has particular importance for developmental neuroscience where longitudinal, repeated-measures, approaches are critical for understanding brain development22. Our focus in this study on a magnetization transfer (MT) saturation protocol as a proxy for myelin content is rooted in evidence of its sensitivity to myelin and related macromolecules17, as well as the fact this measure is more robust to instrumental biases20. There is also evidence for a strong relationship between MT and myelin as measured in histological studies18,19 and we have shown previously that MT is linked to myelin gene expression7. Our longitudinal findings extend the importance of MT as a myelin marker with relevance for individual differences. We show myelin-related effects are expressed in both cortical gray and adjacent white matter, but more pronounced in the former as found also in ex-vivo studies4. Taken together our findings suggest that MT is an important, albeit imperfect, indicator of myelin.
The transition into adulthood is a particularly vulnerable stage for the emergence of psychiatric illness10. Our findings suggest variability in the expression of compulsivity and impulsivity is tied to ongoing microstructural brain development. The brain’s potential to dynamically adjust its myelination49, for example as a function of training50, points to the potential of interventions that target specific deviant trajectories. Such interventions might offer a novel therapeutic domain to lessen a developmental vulnerability to psychiatric disorder.
Online Methods
Study design & participants
The NSPN study33 used an accelerated longitudinal design to investigate variability in compulsivity and impulsivity traits and brain maturation during adolescence and early adulthood. Participants were recruited in London and Cambridgeshire from schools, colleges, primary care services and through advertisement. Subjects were sampled in six age bins 14-15y, 16-17y, 18-19y, 20-21y, and 22-24y, with roughly balanced numbers (overall age mean (std) 19.45 (2.85) years). Each age bin was balanced for sex and ethnicity (relative to the local population). From the 2406 participants that took part in the study and which filled out socio-demographic information and questionnaires at least once, 318 healthy subjects (~60 subjects per age bin) participated in the MRI arm. Subjects with self-reported pervasive neurological, developmental or psychiatric disorders were excluded from the recruitment. After rigorous visual quality control and excluding 10% of scans with highest during-scan motion (cf. Supplementary Fig. S8 for details) of all 558 processed imaging datasets, 61 scans from 30 subjects had to be discarded due to severe artefacts. We finally analysed 497 available brain scans from 288 (149 female) healthy individuals that passed rigorous quality control. In particular, data from 100, 167, and 21 subjects with one, two or three visits per person were available, with mean (standard deviation) follow-up interval of 1.3 (0.32) years between first and last visit. The study was approved by the Cambridge Central Research Ethics Committee (12/EE/0250) and all participants (if <16y also their legal guardian) gave written informed consent.
Assessing compulsivity and impulsivity
To examine the effects of compulsivity and impulsivity traits on myelin development, we analysed psychometric questionnaires that were handed out to the participants over the course of the study. A detailed description of the assessment waves and the overall structure of the NSPN study is provided elsewhere33. As an index of impulsivity, we used the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS)51 total score, a well-established and calibrated measure of general impulsivity. To assess compulsivity, we built a composite score (using principal component analysis (PCA), cf supplementary information) from two established obsessive-compulsive questionnaires that were available in this study (Supplementary Fig. 1a-e, revised Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, OCI-R26, and revised Padua Inventory, PI-WSUR25).
Questionnaires were assessed at several times throughout the study. BIS was completed at home by participants on up to three occasions (ca 1 year between assessments), with the first assessment wave taking place before initial scanning. PI-WSUR was also completed at home during waves 2 and 3. OCI-R was assessed on the day of the second MRI scan. Per construction, the considered psychometric questionnaires aim at measuring stable subject-specific traits but cognitive constructs could as well change over the course of this longitudinal study. In our sample, linear mixed-effects modelling (LME, cf supplementary information) revealed that both indices did not substantially change during the study period while accounting for covariates and confounds, which motivated our use of aggregated scores (LME intercepts) for most of the subsequent MRI analyses on impulsivity. Compulsivity and impulsivity trait measures showed a weak (Pearson) correlation r=0.119 in the large behavioural sample, supporting a notion of rather independent dimensions (less than 1.4% shared variance, cf Supplementary Fig. 1).
MRI data acquisition and longitudinal preprocessing
Brain scans were acquired using the multi-echo FLASH MPM protocol52 on three 3T Siemens Magnetom TIM Trio MRI systems located in Cambridge and London. Comparability between scanners was assessed prior to study onset (for more details, cf 33) and differences between scanners were accounted for by adding scanner as covariates in our analyses. Isotropic 1mm MT maps were collected to quantify local changes in gray and adjacent white matter and all image processing was performed using SPM12 (Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, London, UK, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm), the h-MRI toolbox for SPM53,54 (www.hmri.info), Computational Anatomy toolbox (CAT, http://www.neuro.uni-jena.de/cat/) and custom made tools (cf code availability statement).
Magnetization transfer saturation (MT) maps provide semi-quantitative maps for myelin and related macro-molecules, and correlate highly with myelin content in histological studies18,19. MT shows a high sensitivity to actual microstructural changes such as myelin and thus overcomes limitations in previous methods, such as diffusion tensor imaging, which measure microstructural change only indirectly through assessing diffusivity55. It was also found to be more robust than earlier protocols such as magnetization transfer ratio20. This is important also because myelin patterns are defining for brain anatomy and are used for subdividing brain structures56,57.
Since longitudinal neuroimaging is prone to artefacts due to registration inconsistency, scanner inconsistencies and age-related deformations of the brains, we developed advanced processing pipelines in order to detect the changes of interest and achieve unbiased results. To assess the microstructural myelin-related MT changes during development, we used a longitudinal processing pipeline with the following steps (Supplementary Fig. 2a). To normalise images, we performed a symmetric diffeomorphic registration for longitudinal MRI58. The optimization is realized within one integrated generative model and provides consistent estimates of within-subject brain deformations over the study period and a midpoint image for each subject. The midpoint image is subsequently segmented into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid using CAT. MT maps from all time-points were then normalized to MNI space using geodesic shooting59,60, spatially smoothed preserving GM/WM tissue boundaries54, and manually as well as statistically quality checked using a proxy for during-scan motion (cf. Supplementary Fig. 8) and covariance-based sample homogeneity measures (as implemented in CAT). Lastly, we constructed masks for both gray and adjacent white matter using anatomical atlases for subsequent analysis (cf. illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2b).
To relate these quantitative (Voxel-Based Quantification, VBQ) to more conventional metrics (i.e. Voxel-Based Morphometry), we normalized tissue segment maps to account for existing differences and ongoing changes of local volumes using within- and between-subjects modulation. The obtained maps were spatially smoothed (6 mm FWHM). All analyses were conducted in voxel-space, and then projected onto surface space for illustration purposes. Voxel-wise result maps can be inspected online (cf data availability statement).
In this paper, we focused on the developmental VBQ analysis of myelin-sensitive MT. Since this is the first longitudinal study with this marker, effects of demographics (time/visits, age and sex) as well as impulsivity and compulsivity were considered on the whole-brain level. The analyses were particularly aimed at exploring MT in gray matter and the adjacent superficial white matter tissue. In order to define disjunct but adjacent gray and white matter regions for voxel-based analysis in the MNI template space, the gray and white matter tissue classes of the template were thresholded with 0.5, resulting in an approximately symmetric GM/WM boundary, i.e. with roughly 0.5 probability for each tissue class for voxels on the boundary (shown in Fig. 2). The resulting (non-overlapping) canonical gray and white matter tissue masks are not expected to be biased towards either gray or white matter and thus avoid over- or underestimation on both tissue classes. The subcortical gray and white matter masks were computed analogously.
Longitudinal design specification, MT image, and statistical analyses
In this study, we employed a longitudinal observational design to examine myelin-related MT development in late adolescence and early adulthood. Traditional cross-sectional approaches employ between-subject measures to study age-related differences rather than within-subject changes. These can be affected by biases61, such as cohort differences62,63 or selection bias64, and typically require additional assumptions, such as (a) the age-related effect in the sample is an unbiased estimate of the group level average of individual within-subject effects of time or (b) all subjects change in the same way. Here, we follow recent analysis recommendations65, taking the advantage of the accelerated longitudinal design in which we study separately (in one joint model) (a) how the individual brain changes over time/visits (from baseline to follow up(s)) and (b) how it varies with mean age of different subjects in the study, and their interaction. To do so, we used the accurate and efficient Sandwich Estimator (SwE)65 method for voxel-based longitudinal image analysis (http://www.nisox.org/Software/SwE; cf supplementary information). Similar to common cross-sectional general linear modelling (GLM) approaches, this so-called marginal model describes expected variability as a function of predictors in a design matrix, while additionally accounting for correlations due to repeated measurements and unexplained variations across individuals as an enriched error term (illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 2b),
In our developmental analyses, we focused on the factors time/visits and mean age of the individual (over all visits). Moreover, in order to investigate if, and how, compulsivity and impulsivity traits are related to brain trajectories and altered growth we enriched the models by adding a main effect of trait (compulsivity/impulsivity), as well as their interaction with change over time/visits. The latter metric allowed us to assess how MT growth is associated with compulsivity and impulsivity traits (e.g., lower MT growth in high compulsives), whereas the former indicates how a trait relates to overall MT differences across individuals, independent of all other covariates (time, mean age of a subject over all scans, sex, etc.). Unless specifically mentioned, all analyses were performed in a dimensional manner using the subjects’ trait scores directly rather than comparing median-split groups. Notably, in addition to including effects time/visit, mean age of subject (further denoted age_mean), and compulsivity/impulsivity traits, all models were tested for indications of effects of (a) other relevant demographic factors, especially sex and socioeconomic status (as measured by national poverty index66); (b) effects of during scan motion as indicated by standard deviation of R2* exponential decay residuals in white matter areas (cf. supplementary methods and Supplementary Fig. 8a-c); (c) non-linearites (accelerations/deceleration) of brain changes (across the study age range) and age-related trajectories, especially using time by age_mean interactions, and quadratic/cubic effects of age_mean; and (d) all first order interactions among all previous covariates. All image analyses, if not reported differently, were based on one-sided Wald-tests implementing the research questions (such as hypothesized developmental growth or trait-related impairment) described above. More detailed notes on longitudinal modelling and design specification can be found in supplementary information.
There were no indications of substantial nonlinearities for myelin-sensitive MT (cf Supplementary Fig. 3d), but for volumes (cf Supplementary Fig. 4b). Demographic covariates and confounds (motion, total intracranial volume, scanner, socioeconomic status) were included in all models, and additional interactions of covariates were included when showing significant effects. This is intended to account for potential confounding effects of residual head size variations induced by tissue-weighted smoothing of quantitative MT analysis during morphometric analysis. Additionally, this allows utilisation of a consistent design (and power) across modalities. We additionally examined the effects of potentially confounding covariates, such as alcohol consumption, recreational drug use, ethnicity (‘white’ vs ‘other’), and IQ, but did not find any effect on our main results (cf. Supplementary Fig. 9d). We controlled for the False Discovery Rate (FDR) during corrections for multiple comparisons in all image analyses. We additionally report bootstrapping-based results (cf. Supplementary Fig. 2c; Supplementary Tables 1 & 3-5). We illustrate local trajectories using model predictions based on parameters and data averaged in 6mm spheres around peak effects. These model predictions are focussed on specific effects of interest (e.g. study visit or impulsivity) while the data is shown adjusting for effects of no-interest (e.g. other covariates and confounds, c.f. illustrated in Supplementary Fig. 4b).
To examine the topographical similarity of growth effects in gray and adjacent white matter, we assessed the correlation between GM and nearest neighbouring WM voxels (significance tested using 1000 permutation tests).
The sample size was conceived by NSPN consortium during the design of this study based on the developmental studies that were available at the time33. We used normalisation procedures (z-scoring and boxcox-transformation) for the psychometric data to align with the normality assumptions of our tests. In addition, all qMRI image analysis were additionally examined using sampling methods that do not assume normality of data distributions to allow valid inference. Our study had an observational design and no randomization of subgroups was used. Our study design also implied that data collection and analysis were not performed blinded.
Analysis of macrostructural changes and MT/Volume associations
To relate the findings from our microstructural myelin marker (MT) to traditional macrostructural markers (GM/WM volume), we performed analogue analyses (using VBM67) as described above on traditional normalized tissue segment maps. To quantify how developmental changes of macro- to microstructural parameters correlate, we specified a multi-modal SwE model including all volumetric and MT scans in a joint (block-diagonal) design matrix with all covariates separately for each modality. Developmental effects within each modality are defined by respective time/visit and age_mean beta estimates of those regressors of the design matrix. After SwE model estimation, the posterior covariance of these beta parameters from volume and MT modalities were calculated and transformed into correlation (see Fig. 2b).
Assessing wide-spread effects of compulsivity and impulsivity
To assess the effects of development and compulsivity/impulsivity on myelin-sensitive MT across the entire frontal lobe (GM, WM separately), we used linear mixed-effects modelling (LME, cf supplementary information). Besides assessing the effects of time/visit and time by (continuous) trait interactions, we calculated the model predictions over the study period while accounting for covariates68. Random-effect intercepts were included and proved optimally suited using likelihood ratio tests. Global frontal MT was analysed separately for each dimension (shown in Supplementary Fig. 7a) and jointly with both dimensions (and their interaction) included in the design (Supplementary Fig. 7b). For both of these global models, we used discrete (median split bivariate traits: low vs. high) for simplified illustration although continuous variables were used during modelling.
Analysis of correlated changes of brain and impulsivity
To assess whether MT development was related individual changes in impulsivity, we conducted a hypothesis-driven analysis of the bilateral IGF (anatomically defined). This LME analysis provides information about whether changes in impulsivity also reflect how quickly a brain region myelinates during the study period. The LME model used IFG MT, rates of change in IFG MT, time, their interaction, as well as the above introduced covariates as fixed effect to predict the dependent variable impulsivity score. We visualize the observed correlated changes using simple correlations. In addition, we conducted exploratory voxel-wise correlated change analyses. Time-varying BIS scores were decomposed in purely within- and between-subject components and entered as regressors in voxel-wise SwE modelling of myelin-sensitive MT (in addition to covariates time/visits, age_mean, sex, interactions and confounds, cf. supplemental information).
Analysis of MT peak effect specificity for both traits and compulsivity subtests
Above described voxel-based SwE analysis assessed whether there is region-specific growth in myelin-sensitive MT and compulsivity and impulsivity related impairment of the ongoing myelination process. However, here we complemented this by a subsequent analysis of MT in observed fronto-striatal peak effects (Fig. 3 and 4) and global frontal MT using LME modelling. More specifically, we were interested in specificity of local brain trajectories associated with each or eventually both impulsivity and compulsivity traits. The fixed effects design was specified with X = [intercept, time/visit, time by trait interaction, trait, age_mean, sex, socioeconomic status, confounders] (similar to the mass-univariate SwE models above). We explored the potential interaction of both dimensions, in addition to the separate modelling (presented in Fig. 3 & 4) a joint model was specified including both traits simultaneously, as well as their interaction (not found to be significant), and their respective interactions with time/visits. By inclusion of both effects of trait as well as their time by trait interaction, we accounted for potential baseline and rate-of-change differences related to both trait dimensions simultaneously rendering coefficients/statistics specific for each dimension. Random effects were restricted to intercepts. The specificity of MT (averaged in 6mm sphere around peaks observed in voxel-based SwE analysis above) for compulsivity and impulsivity is presented in Supplementary Fig. 6. Finally, we assessed the specificity of two available compulsivity scores, OCI-R and PI-WSUR for the observed reduced MT growth effects using our compulsivity dimension (from PCA). Thus, we explored each subscore’s main effect and time/visit interactions on local MT trajectories (in averaged in 6mm spheres of peaks presented in Fig. 3a) as detailed in Supplementary Fig. 5c.
Reporting Summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
A Wellcome Trust Cambridge-UCL Mental Health and Neurosciences Network grant (095844/Z/11/Z) supported this work. RJD holds a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award (098362/Z/12/Z). The UCL-Max Planck Centre is a joint initiative supported by UCL and the Max Planck Society (MPS). TUH is supported by a Wellcome Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (211155/Z/18/Z), a grant from the Jacobs Foundation, the Medical Research Foundation, and a 2018 NARSAD Young Investigator grant (27023) from the Brain & Behavior Research Foundation. MM receives support from the UCLH NIHR BRC. PF is in receipt of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Award (NF-SI-0514-10157), and was in part supported by the NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) North Thames at Barts Health NHS Trust. EB is in receipt of a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Senior Investigator Award, and was in part supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging is supported by core funding from the Wellcome Trust (203147/Z/16/Z). First, we thank R. Davis and FIL IT support for making large sample analysis feasible and more efficient. Thanks also to G. Prabhu. We thank specific experts for input in relation to applied and technical methods, particularly R. Dahnke, W. Penny and G. Ridgway, M. Callaghan, N. Weiskopf and B. Draganski, J. Ashburner and C. Gaser, G. Flandin, T. Nichols, B. Guillaume, J. Bernal-Rusiel, M. Völkle, C. Driver, A. Brandmeier, F. Dick, M. Betts, GJ. Will, and R. Kievit. Finally, GZ thanks E. Düzel for support at the DZNE. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.
Footnotes
Data Availability Statement
Whole-brain results are available for inspection online on Neurovault (https://neurovault.org/collections/YAHZLJRW/). Data for this specific paper has been uploaded to the Cambridge Data Repository (https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.12959) and password protected. Our participants did not give informed consent for their measures to be made publicly available, and it is possible that they could be identified from this data set. Access to the data supporting the analyses presented in this paper will be made available to researchers with a reasonable request to openNSPN@medschl.cam.ac.uk or the corresponding authors [G.Z., T.U.H.].
Code availability
Custom made SPM pipeline code for longitudinal VBM and VBQ processing is provided along with the manuscript (https://github.com/gabrielziegler/gz/tree/master/nspn_mpm_prepro_code_and_example). The code aims at transparency of applied procedures but is not intended for clinical use. It is free but copyright software, distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public Licence as published by the Free Software Foundation (either version 2, or at your option, any later version). For any questions and requests please contact gabriel.ziegler@dzne.de
Author contributions
E.T.B., I.M.G., P.F., P.B.J., NSPN Consortium, M.M, and R.J.D. designed the experiment. G.Z., T.U.H. and NSPN Consortium performed the experiment and analysed the data. G.Z., T.U.H., U.L. and R.J.D. wrote the paper.
Competing Interest
E.T.B. is employed half-time by the University of Cambridge and half-time by GlaxoSmithKline and holds stock in GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors declare no competing financial interests.
References
- 1.Gogtay N, et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:8174–8179. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402680101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sowell ER, Thompson PM, Holmes CJ, Jernigan TL, Toga AW. In vivo evidence for post-adolescent brain maturation in frontal and striatal regions. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:859–861. doi: 10.1038/13154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Paus T. Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: myelin or axon? Brain Cogn. 2010;72:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miller DJ, et al. Prolonged myelination in human neocortical evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:16480–16485. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1117943109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Perrin JS, et al. Growth of white matter in the adolescent brain: role of testosterone and androgen receptor. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2008;28:9519–9524. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1212-08.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Petanjek Z, et al. Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13281–13286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105108108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Whitaker KJ, et al. Adolescence is associated with genomically patterned consolidation of the hubs of the human brain connectome. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113:9105–9110. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601745113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Foulkes L, Blakemore S-J. Studying individual differences in human adolescent brain development. Nat Neurosci. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s4159-018-0078-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kessler RC, et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry Off J World Psychiatr Assoc WPA. 2007;6:168–176. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Paus T, Keshavan M, Giedd JN. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:947–957. doi: 10.1038/nrn2513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.McCarthy H, et al. Attention network hypoconnectivity with default and affective network hyperconnectivity in adults diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in childhood. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70:1329–1337. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Douaud G, et al. A common brain network links development, aging, and vulnerability to disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2014;111:17648–17653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1410378111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Robbins TW, Gillan CM, Smith DG, de Wit S, Ersche KD. Neurocognitive endophenotypes of impulsivity and compulsivity: towards dimensional psychiatry. Trends Cogn Sci. 2012;16:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Wit SJ, et al. Multicenter voxel-based morphometry mega-analysis of structural brain scans in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:340–349. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13040574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Norman LJ, et al. Structural and functional brain abnormalities in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder: A comparative meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73:815–825. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Carlisi CO, et al. Comparative multimodal meta-analysis of structural and functional brain abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weiskopf N, Mohammadi S, Lutti A, Callaghan MF. Advances in MRI-based computational neuroanatomy: from morphometry to in-vivo histology. Curr Opin Neurol. 2015;28:313–322. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Schmierer K, Scaravilli F, Altmann DR, Barker GJ, Miller DH. Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain. Ann Neurol. 2004;56:407–415. doi: 10.1002/ana.20202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Turati L, et al. In vivo quantitative magnetization transfer imaging correlates with histology during de- and remyelination in cuprizone-treated mice. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:327–337. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Callaghan MF, Helms G, Lutti A, Mohammadi S, Weiskopf N. A general linear relaxometry model of R1 using imaging data. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73:1309–1314. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Campbell JSW, et al. Promise and pitfalls of g-ratio estimation with MRI. NeuroImage. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Raz N, Lindenberger U. Only time will tell: cross-sectional studies offer no solution to the age-brain-cognition triangle: comment on Salthouse (2011) Psychol Bull. 2011;137:790–795. doi: 10.1037/a0024503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Paus T. Mapping brain maturation and cognitive development during adolescence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9:60–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Natu VS, et al. Apparent thinning of visual cortex during childhood is associated with myelination, not pruning. bioRxiv. 2018 doi: 10.1101/368274. 368274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burns GL, Keortge SG, Formea GM, Sternberger LG. Revision of the Padua Inventory of obsessive compulsive disorder symptoms: Distinctions between worry, obsessions, and compulsions. Behav Res Ther. 1996;34:163–173. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(95)00035-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Foa EB, et al. The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: Development and validation of a short version. Psychol Assess. 2002;14:485–496. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Haber SN. Corticostriatal circuitry. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2016;18:7–21. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2016.18.1/shaber. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Palminteri S, Chevallier C. Can We Infer Inter-Individual Differences in Risk-Taking From Behavioral Tasks? Front Psychol. 2018;9 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pedroni A, et al. The risk elicitation puzzle. Nat Hum Behav. 2017;1:803. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0219-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Frey R, Pedroni A, Mata R, Rieskamp J, Hertwig R. Risk preference shares the psychometric structure of major psychological traits. Sci Adv. 2017;3:e1701381. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1701381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moutoussis M, et al. Change, stability, and instability in the Pavlovian guidance of behaviour from adolescence to young adulthood. PLOS Comput Biol. 2018;14:e1006679. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shahar N, et al. Improving the reliability of model-based decision-making estimates in the two-stage decision task with reaction-times and drift-diffusion modeling. PLOS Comput Biol. 2019 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kiddle B, et al. Cohort profile: The NSPN 2400 Cohort: a developmental sample supporting the Wellcome Trust NeuroScience in Psychiatry Network. Int J Epidemiol. 2017 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyx117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moutoussis M, Bentall RP, El-Deredy W, Dayan P. Bayesian modelling of Jumping-to-Conclusions bias in delusional patients. Cognit Neuropsychiatry. 2011;16:422–447. doi: 10.1080/13546805.2010.548678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Virchow R. Ueber das ausgebreitete Vorkommen einer dem Nervenmark analogen Substanz in den thierischen Geweben. Arch Für Pathol Anat Physiol Für Klin Med. 1854;6:562–572. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bunge RP. Glial cells and the central myelin sheath. Physiol Rev. 1968;48:197–251. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1968.48.1.197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Holmes AJ, Patrick LM. The Myth of Optimality in Clinical Neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2018;22:241–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Rubia K. ‘Cool’ inferior frontostriatal dysfunction in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder versus ‘hot’ ventromedial orbitofrontal-limbic dysfunction in conduct disorder: a review. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69:e69–87. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hauser TU, et al. Role of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex in Impaired Decision Making in Juvenile Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.1093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hauser TU, et al. Increased fronto-striatal reward prediction errors moderate decision making in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychol Med. 2017:1–13. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gillan CM, et al. Functional neuroimaging of avoidance habits in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2015;172:284–293. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.14040525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Dougherty DD, et al. Prospective long-term follow-up of 44 patients who received cingulotomy for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;159:269–275. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Figee M, et al. Deep brain stimulation restores frontostriatal network activity in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:386–387. doi: 10.1038/nn.3344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Boedhoe PSW, et al. Distinct Subcortical Volume Alterations in Pediatric and Adult OCD: A Worldwide Meta- and Mega-Analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 2016 doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16020201. appiajp201616020201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Whelan R, et al. Adolescent impulsivity phenotypes characterized by distinct brain networks. Nat Neurosci. 2012;15:920–925. doi: 10.1038/nn.3092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Holmes AJ, Hollinshead MO, Roffman JL, Smoller JW, Buckner RL. Individual Differences in Cognitive Control Circuit Anatomy Link Sensation Seeking, Impulsivity, and Substance Use. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2016;36:4038–4049. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3206-15.2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Pingault J-B, et al. Using genetic data to strengthen causal inference in observational research. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19:566–580. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0020-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lerch JP, et al. Studying neuroanatomy using MRI. Nat Neurosci. 2017;20:314–326. doi: 10.1038/nn.4501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Franklin RJM, ffrench-Constant C. Remyelination in the CNS: from biology to therapy. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;9:839–855. doi: 10.1038/nrn2480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sampaio-Baptista C, et al. Motor skill learning induces changes in white matter microstructure and myelination. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci. 2013;33:19499–19503. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3048-13.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51:768–774. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Weiskopf N, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front Neurosci. 2013;7 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Callaghan MF, et al. Widespread age-related differences in the human brain microstructure revealed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35:1862–1872. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Draganski B, et al. Regional specificity of MRI contrast parameter changes in normal ageing revealed by voxel-based quantification (VBQ) NeuroImage. 2011;55:1423–1434. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jones DK, Knösche TR, Turner R. White matter integrity, fiber count, and other fallacies: The do’s and don’ts of diffusion MRI. NeuroImage. 2013;73:239–254. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Donahue CJ, Glasser MF, Preuss TM, Rilling JK, Van Essen DC. Quantitative assessment of prefrontal cortex in humans relative to nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:E5183–E5192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721653115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Glasser MF, et al. A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex. Nature. 2016;536:171–178. doi: 10.1038/nature18933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ashburner J, Ridgway GR. Symmetric diffeomorphic modeling of longitudinal structural MRI. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:197. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. NeuroImage. 2007;38:95–113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Diffeomorphic registration using geodesic shooting and Gauss–Newton optimisation. NeuroImage. 2011;55:954–967. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Neuhaus JM, Kalbfleisch JD. Between- and Within-Cluster Covariate Effects in the Analysis of Clustered Data. Biometrics. 1998;54:638–645. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hoffman L, Hofer SM, Sliwinski MJ. On the confounds among retest gains and age-cohort differences in the estimation of within-person change in longitudinal studies: a simulation study. Psychol Aging. 2011;26:778–791. doi: 10.1037/a0023910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sliwinski M, Hoffman L, Hofer SM. Evaluating Convergence of Within-Person Change and Between-Person Age Differences in Age-Heterogeneous Longitudinal Studies. Res Hum Dev. 2010;7:45–60. doi: 10.1080/15427600903578169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lash TL, Fox MP, Fink AK. Applying Quantitative Bias Analysis to Epidemiologic Data. Springer; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 65.Guillaume B, et al. Fast and accurate modelling of longitudinal and repeated measures neuroimaging data. NeuroImage. 2014;94:287–302. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Personal and household finances. Office for National Statistics; [Accessed: 17th October 2018]. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/personalandhouseholdfinances/. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ashburner J, Friston KJ. Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. NeuroImage. 2000;11:805–821. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gelman A, et al. Bayesian Data Analysis. Third Edition. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2013. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.