Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Methods. 2020 Jun 1;17(6):629–635. doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-0837-5

Extended Data Fig. 6. Technical properties of the ground truth perturbation experiment.

Extended Data Fig. 6

a. Gene expression level in K562 cells of the various gRNA target genes used. b. Enhancer gRNAs were validated by pooled transduction of K562 dCas9-KRAB cells with all four enhancer-targeting guides, and the effect on target gene expression was quantified by qPCR. HBE1 was analyzed as target gene for the HS2 enhancer. n=3 replicates. c. Histogram of the number of gRNAs identified per cell in the TAP-seq experiment of Figure 2. d. The number of gRNAs observed per cell (see also in c) was fitted with a generative model of gRNA capture efficiency and multiplicity of infection4,20. Log-likelihood is plotted as a function of the parameters; the maximum likelihood estimate is marked by a cross. Data from n=21,977 (TAP-seq), n=7,994 (Perturb-Seq) or n=37,971 cells (Perturb-seq + gRNA amp.) was used. e. Mean expression per gene for whole transcriptome 10X Genomics compared to TAP-seq, with perturbation target genes highlighted. n=74 genes from panel 2 are shown. Two genes for which perturbation effects were detected with a lower efficiency in TAP-seq are highlighted in red.