Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 May 10.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2019 Feb 14;53:156–164. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2019.02.007

Table 3.

A comparison between inter-observer errors, stratified decision forests (Oktay et al., 2017), and different agents using fixed-scale (FS) and multi-scale (MS) search strategies for the detection of apex and center of mitral valve landmarks in cardiac MR images. Distance errors are in mm. Bold text shows the highest achieved localization accuracy for each landmark.

Method Apex (AP) Mitral Valve (MV)
Inter-observer Errors 5.79 ± 3.28 5.30±2.98
Decision Forests (Oktay et al., 2017) 6.74 ± 4.12 6.32 ± 3.95
Proposed RL Agents FS MS FS MS
DQN 7.49 ± 4.05 4.47±2.63 8.33 ± 4.70 5.73±4.16
DDQN 8.13 ± 5.60 4.53±2.78 8.82 ± 4.80 5.20±2.82
Duel DQN 7.17±4.21 4.42 ± 2.67 8.82 ± 4.80 5.76 ± 3.89
Duel DDQN 7.59 ± 4.17 5.43±3.37 8.63±4.58 5.28±2.61