Skip to main content
UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts logoLink to UKPMC Funders Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 21.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet A. 2020 Aug 9;182(11):2521–2528. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.61814

Whole genome sequence analysis identifies a PAX2 mutation to establish a correct diagnosis for a syndromic form of hyperuricemia

Mark Stevenson 1, Alistair T Pagnamenta 2, Silvia Reichart 3, Charlotte Philpott 1, Kate E Lines 1; OxClinWGS, Caroline M Gorvin 1, Karl Lhotta 4, Jenny C Taylor 2, Rajesh V Thakker 1,
PMCID: PMC7611017  EMSID: EMS127174  PMID: 32776440

Abstract

Hereditary hyperuricemia may occur as part of a syndromic disorder or as an isolated nonsyndromic disease, and over 20 causative genes have been identified. Here, we report the use of whole genome sequencing (WGS) to establish a diagnosis in a family in which individuals were affected with gout, hyperuricemia associated with reduced fractional excretion of uric acid, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and secondary hyperparathyroidism, that are consistent with familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy (FJHN). However, single gene testing had not detected mutations in the uromodulin (UMOD) or renin (REN) genes, which cause approximately 30-90% of FJHN. WGS was therefore undertaken, and this identified a heterozygous c.226G>C (p.Gly76Arg) missense variant in the paired box gene 2 (PAX2) gene, which co-segregated with renal tubulopathy in the family. PAX2 mutations are associated with renal coloboma syndrome (RCS), which is characterized by abnormalities in renal structure and function, and anomalies of the optic nerve. Ophthalmological examination in two adult brothers affected with hyperuricemia, gout, and CKD revealed the presence of optic disc pits, consistent with optic nerve coloboma, thereby revising the diagnosis from FJHN to RCS. Thus, our results demonstrate the utility of WGS analysis in establishing the correct diagnosis in disorders with multiple etiologies.

Keywords: ADTKD, CKD, optic disc pits, papillorenal syndrome, RCS

1. Introduction

Hyperuricemia, which may lead to gout, occurs as an acquired or inherited metabolic abnormality. Acquired hyperuricemia may be due to: a diet high in purines (e.g., meats, fructose, and beer); drugs (e.g., thiazide diuretics, cytotoxic agents, and low dose aspirin); obesity and metabolic syndrome as a consequence of insulin resistance and the role of insulin reducing urinary urate excretion; hypertension resulting in renal vasoconstriction and uric acid retention; chronic kidney disease (CKD) and renal failure; and low level lead and cadmium intoxication (Choi, Atkinson, Karlson, Willett, & Curhan, 2004; Johnson et al., 2013; Lin, Ho, & Yu, 1999; Messerli, Frohlich, Dreslinski, Suarez, & Aristimuno, 1980; Quinones Galvan et al., 1995; Sharon & Schlesinger, 2016). Hereditary hyperuricemia may occur as an isolated nonsyndromic disease or as part of a syndromic disorder (Megaw, Lampe, Dhillon, Yoshida, & Wright, 2013; Partington & Hennen, 1967; Sperling, Sarapers, Eilam, & Devries, 1972). Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have reported associations between hyperuricemia and approximately 30 loci (e.g., GLUT9, SLC2A9, ABCG2, SLC17A3, SLC17A1, SLC22A11, SLC22A12, GCKR, LRRC16A, PDZK1, R3HDM2-INHBC, RREB1, TRIM46, INHBB, SFMBT1, TMEM171, VEGFA, BAZ1B, PRKAG2, STC1, HNF4G, A1CF, ATXN2, UBE2Q2, IGF1R, NFAT5, MAF, HLF, ACVR1B-ACVRL1, and B3GNT4) (Dehghan et al., 2008; Doring et al., 2008; Kolz et al., 2009; Kottgen et al., 2013; Li et al., 2007; Vitart et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2010), and approximately 20 syndromes associated with hyperuricemia are listed on the Online Mendelial Inheritance in Man (OMIM) database, and these include the Lesch-Nyhan syndrome (MIM 300322), phosphoribosylpyrophosphate synthetase superactivity (MIM 300661), medullary cystic kidney disease (MCKD; MIM 603860), and familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy (FJHN; MIM 162000).

FJHN, which is a genetically heterogeneous disorder, is characterized by hyperuricemia, reduced fractional excretion of uric acid (FEUA), gout, and progressive end stage renal disease (ESRD) associated with interstitial fibrosis. FJHN in approximately 25-85%, <5%, <1%, and <5% of patients is associated with mutations of the UMOD, renin (REN), protein transport protein SEC61 translocon subunit alpha 1 (SEC61A1), and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 homeobox B (HNF-1β) genes, respectively (Bleyer, Kidd, Zivna, & Kmoch, 2017; Clissold, Hamilton, Hattersley, Ellard, & Bingham, 2015; Dahan et al., 2003; Devuyst et al., 2019; Devuyst, Olinger, & Rampoldi, 2017; Kudo et al., 2004; Piret et al., 2011; Simmonds, Cameron, Goldsmith, Fairbanks, & Raman, 2006; Stacey et al., 2003; Stiburkova, Majewski, & Hodanova, 2002; van der Made et al., 2015; Venkat-Raman, Gast, Marinaki, & Fairbanks, 2016; Vylet’al et al., 2006; Williams et al., 2009). A further FJHN locus has been mapped to chromosome 2p22.1-2p21.2, but its causative gene defect has yet to be identified (Piret et al., 2011).

Here, we report a kindred considered to have FJHN on the basis of hyperuricemia, gout, reduced FEUA, and CKD, but in whom Sanger DNA sequence analysis had not detected mutations of UMOD or REN, which account for approximately 30-90% of cases. However, whole genome sequence (WGS) analysis unexpectedly revealed that a mutation of the paired box 2 (PAX2) gene was the likely cause of FJHN in this kindred, which prompted clinical reassessment of the family.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Editorial policies and ethical considerations

Informed consent and venous blood samples were obtained from nine available members (comprising five affected and four unaffected members) of the family with suspected FJHN, using protocols approved by the Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (UK) (MREC/02/2/93), and local ethics committees (Austria).

2.2. Patients and clinical findings

The proband (Figure 1a, individual II.1), a 57-year-old man, presented with hyperuricemia with reduced FEUA at 32 years of age, and later developed CKD and secondary hyperparathyroidism (Table 1), consistent with FJHN. Histological analysis of a single glomerulus from a kidney biopsy taken at the age of 32 years was suggestive of glomerulonephritis but was considered inconclusive as other glomerula were not present among the biopsy sections to confirm this finding. Electron microscopy of the single glomerulus showed that it was abnormal with segmental lobe collapse, basal membrane ruptures, and segmental sclerosis with numerous tubular-reticular structures. At 53 years of age he had an elevated serum creatinine of 4.2 mg/dl [normal range (NR) = 0.5-1.2 mg/dl], proteinuria of 2,500 mg/g creatinine (NR <110 mg/g), albuminuria of 1,655 mg/g creatinine (NR <3 mg/g), and a reduced FEUA of 4.5% (NR = 7.5 ± 1.8%). He was treated with ramipril 5 mg/day, calcitriol 0.25 μg/day, cholecalciferol 12,000 IU/week, allopurinol 100 mg/day, and bicarbonate 2,500 mg/day. Two years later peritoneal dialysis was started due to end-stage kidney disease. The proband’s brother (individual II.2) was also affected, and presented at the age of 44 years with gout. Clinical evaluation revealed: renal insufficiency with elevated serum creatinine of 1.8 mg/dl; recurrent attacks of gout, hyperuricemia and a reduced FEUA of 4.7%; and proteinuria and albuminuria of 740 and 323 mg/g creatinine, respectively (Table 1). He was treated with ramipril 5 mg and allopurinol 150 mg/day. The proband’s father (individual I.1) had chronic renal failure, with serum creatinine of 1.3 mg/dl, and proteinuria of 1,000 mg/g creatinine (Table 1). The proband’s younger brother (individual II.4) had mild albuminuria of 34 mg/g creatinine, and his niece (individual III.3) had albuminuria of 689 mg/g creatinine and proteinuria of 910 mg/g creatinine (Table 1). The albuminuria observed in patients II.1, II.2, and III.3 was considerably higher than that reported previously in other patients with FJHN (Eckardt et al., 2015; Lee, Kim, Oh, Noh, & Lee, 2010). Mutational analysis of the UMOD and REN genes using leukocyte DNA from the proband did not detect any abnormalities.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

(a) Pedigree of affected proband (individual II.1, indicated with an arrow), with four affected relatives (individuals I.1, II.2, II.4, and III.3) and four unaffected relatives (individuals II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4). Males: square; females: circle. Open symbols: unaffected; filled top left quadrant: kidney disease; filled top right quadrant: hyperuricemia; filled bottom left quadrant: secondary hyperparathyroidism; and filled bottom right quadrant: proteinuria and/or albuminuria. *optic nerve pathology; §no optic nerve pathology; ?optic nerve pathology status unknown. (b) DNA sequence analysis showing c.226G>C (highlighted) within exon 3 of PAX2. The DNA sequence chromatograms show that the affected proband (individual II.1), his affected father (individual I.1), affected brothers (individuals II.2 and II.4), and affected niece (individual III.3), are heterozygous G/C, while the unaffected relatives (individuals II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4) are all homozygous G/G. (c) The PAX2 c.226G>C mutation is predicted to lead to a missense substitution of Gly, encoded by GGC, to Arg, encoded by CGC, at codon 76 and result in the loss of a BsrFαI RE site (R/CCGG/Y). Restriction maps show that the BsrFαI digest would result in four products for the wild-type (WT), and three products for the mutant (m). RE digest of PAX2 exon 3 PCR products demonstrating that the affected individuals I.1, II.1, II.2, II.4, and III.3 are heterozygous for WT (346, 288,124, and 29 bp [not shown]), and m (346, 288, and 153 bp) alleles, and unaffected relatives II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4 are homozygous for WT alleles. S, size marker. (d) Multiple protein sequence alignment of PAX2 residues comprising a paired domain involved in DNA binding. Conserved residues are shown in gray, and wild-type Gly76 (G76) and mutant Arg76 (R76) are shown in red. (e) Ophthalmological examination of proband II.1 showing dysplastic optic nerve (indicated by a dotted yellow line) in the right eye and an optic disc pit (indicated by a dotted yellow line) in the left eye

Table 1. Clinical details of affected and unaffected members of the kindred with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Individual
I.1 II.1 II.2 II.3 II.4 III.1 III.2 III.3 III.4
Chronic kidney diseasea G3aA3 G5D G3bA3 G2A2 G2A3
Serum creatinine (mg/dl) (NR 0.5-1.2 mg/dl) 1.3 4.2 1.8 0.83 1.05 0.63 1.05 0.92 0.86
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (NR >90 ml/min/1.73 m2) 48 15 44 80 84 122 97 86 95
Proteinuria (mg/g creatinine) (NR <110 mg/g) 1,000 2,500 740 100 910
Albuminuria (mg/g creatinine) (NR <3 mg/g) 1,655 323 <3 34 <3 <3 689 <3
Secondary hyperparathyroidism +
Hyperuricemia + +
Gout + +
FEUA (%) (NR 7.5 ±1.8%) 4.5 4.7 7.7
PAX2 mutation (p.Gly76Arg) + + + + +
Ocular abnormality NT Bilateral Unilateral Unilateral NT NT Unilateral NT
Current age 93 57 53 56 30 31 29 29 27
Age of onset Unknownb 32 (gout) 44(gout) c,d c

Note: + = present; − = absent/not reported; NT = not tested. Individuals II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4, who had normal renal function and absence of the PAX2 p.Gly76Arg mutation and are unaffected, are shown in italics, while individuals that are not in italics are affected. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula.

Abbreviation: FEUA, fractional excretion of uric acid.

a

CKD stages according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification (Kidney International Supplements Volume 3, Issue 12,013, KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease).

b

Suffers from dementia so age of onset unknown.

c

Asymptomatic mutation carrier.

d

Mild hearing loss reported.

2.3. WGS and variant confirmation

Leukocyte DNA was used for WGS (Supporting Information Methods), utilizing DNA from two affected individuals [individuals II.1 and II.2 (Table 1 and Figure 1)]. Variants were confirmed by DNA Sanger sequence analysis using PCR products that were generated using PAX2 forward (5’-AGT AGG AAA GGG CTC GAG GTG GT-3’) and reverse (5’-GGA GAA GCC TGG CAG GGA ATA-3’) primers (Life Technologies), the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Life Technologies) and an automated detection system (ABI3730 Automated capillary sequencer; Applied Biosystems). Further validation was performed by BsrFαI (New England Biolabs) restriction endonuclease (RE) digestion of PCR products according to the manufacturer’s guidelines.

3. Results

WGS analysis of leukocyte DNA from two affected individuals (Figure 1a, II.1 and II.2) confirmed the absence of UMOD and REN abnormalities, and also an absence of abnormalities within the SEC61A1 and HNF-1β genes that have been reported to be associated with FJHN. Futhermore, copy number variants (CNVs) were not identified in these four genes, and an examination of all rare (allele frequency <3%) variants in these genes also did not reveal any deleterious alleles to be shared by the two affected brothers, II.1 and II.2 (Table S1). CNVs in three other genes (LINC01060, NRG3, and PMM2) were found (Table S2), but were not further investigated as they were highly unlikely to be causative of the phenotypic abnormalities. However, WGS analysis identified a heterozygous G-to-C transversion at nucleotide c.226 in exon 3 of PAX2 (NM_003987.3) that was confirmed by DNA Sanger sequence analysis (Figure 1b). This G-to-C transversion (GGC to CGC), which predicts a missense substitution (p.Gly76Arg) of the PAX2 protein led to the loss of a BsrFaI RE site (Figure 1c). Analysis of the nine available family members (5 affected and 4 unaffected members) by DNA Sanger sequencing (Figure 1b) and RE digestion (Figure 1c) revealed co-segregation of the c.226G>C variant and FJHN phenotype. Thus, the heterozygous PAX2 c.226G>C variant was present in the five affected individuals (I.1, II.1, II.2, II.4, and III.3), but not in the four unaffected individuals (II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4) that were homozygous for the wild-type c.226G (Figure 1b,c). Moreover, this PAX2 c.226G>C variant was absent from the greater than 125,000 exomes and greater than 15,000 genomes contained within the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD v2.1.1) database (Karczewski et al., 2020). Analysis of p. Gly76Arg using SIFT (http://sift.jcvi.org/), Mutation Taster (http:www.mutationtaster.org/), and PolyPhen-2 (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) predicted the variant to be “Deleterious,” “Disease Causing,” and “Probably Damaging,” respectively. Gly76, which is located in the paired domain of PAX2, lies within a stretch of evolutionarily highly conserved residues (Figure 1d), and this further supports the pathogenicity of the p.Gly76Arg variant. In addition, a different missense mutation at this same residue (p.Gly76Ser) has been reported in patients with renal coloboma syndrome (RCS), and these combined observations help support that the p.Gly76Arg identified in this family (Figure 1a-c) is also a disease-causing variant. RCS, which is also known as papillorenal syndrome (PAPRS) (MIM 120330) (Devriendt et al., 1998), is characterized by renal and ocular anomalies that include renal hypodysplasia and insufficiency progressing to ESRD, and optic nerve coloboma. RCS has been reported to be associated with hyperuricemia and gout in two unrelated families (Deng et al., 2019; Megaw et al., 2013) and the finding of the PAX2 Gly76Arg mutation in the family with FJHN (Figure 1a-c) prompted an ophthalmological examination of the proband (II.1). This revealed the presence of a dysplastic papilla with temporal inferior pallor in the right eye and of an optic disc pit in the left eye (Figure 1e), consistent with optic nerve coloboma in both eyes. Subsequent ophthalmological examinations of the affected brothers (II.2 and II.4) and niece (III.3) revealed the presence of unilateral optic nerve colobomas only, in all of them. Other ocular abnormalities were not identified in any of these four affected individuals (II.1, II.2, II.4, and III.3), and ophthalmological examination of the unaffected sister (II.3) also revealed no abnormalities. The findings in the four affected individuals (II.1, II.2, II.4, and III.3) are consistent with a diagnosis of RCS, which has been reported to be also associated with anomalies of the central nervous system (CNS), intellectual disability, hearing loss, joint laxity, and elevations of pancreatic amylase; and these individuals were therefore further assessed for such manifestations. This revealed that none of the individuals had: clinical signs of CNS anomalies, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain in individuals II.1 and II.2, has revealed the occurrence of only of an empty sella turcica in individual II.1; intellectual disability; hearing loss, except individual II.4 who is reported to have mild hearing loss but has declined formal hearing tests; joint laxity; a history of pancreatitis; or elevated pancreatic amylase, which has been assessed in only individual II.1.

4. Discussion

Our study reports a kindred affected with CKD, reduced FEUA, hyperuricemia, and gout, which were consistent with a diagnosis of FJHN. However, the kindred did not have UMOD, REN, SEC61A1, or HNF-1β gene mutations, which collectively are associated with approximately 30-90% of FJHN cases, but instead had a missense mutation (p.Gly76Arg) of PAX2, whose abnormalities are more commonly associated with RCS. Indeed, ophthalmic examination, prompted after the identification of the PAX2 mutation by WGS, identified optic nerve abnormalities consistent with RCS, in all four affected family members that were available for ophthalmic assessments (Figure 1a-e).

RCS is characterized by abnormalities in renal structure and function in greater than 90% of patients, ophthalmological anomalies in greater than 75% of patients, and hearing loss in less than 10% of patients (Bower et al., 2012). The most common renal findings are renal hypodysplasia, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR), renal cysts, and multicystic dysplastic kidneys, which occur in 65%, ~15%, <10%, and ~5% of patients, respectively. Renal failure is reported in approximately 15% of cases, while CKD stage 5 requiring a kidney transplant is common and has a range of onset from birth to greater than 75 years of age (Bower et al., 2012). The ophthalmoscopic findings include optic nerve coloboma, optic disc dysplasia, excavation of the optic disc or optic disc “pits,” morning glory anomaly, and hypoplastic optic discs, which occur in ~50%, >10%, <10%, ~5%, and <5% of patients, respectively (Bower et al., 2012). Retinal, macular, and lens abnormalities have also been reported in some patients (Bower et al., 2012). PAX2 is expressed in other tissues (e.g., cerebellum, hypothalamus otic vesicle, genitourinary tract, and pancreas), and additional features of RCS include CNS anomalies, intellectual disability and elevated pancreatic amylase (Bower et al., 2012).

A frameshift deletion of PAX2 in a family with optic nerve colobomas, renal hypoplasia and VUR (Sanyanusin et al., 1995) represents the first reported single gene defect causation of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Subsequently, larger patient cohort studies confirmed PAX2 mutations as an important cause of syndromic CAKUT and the establishment of RCS as a separate disease entity (Madariaga et al., 2013; Rossanti et al., 2020; Thomas et al., 2011; Weber et al., 2006). PAX2 is a member of the paired box (PAX) family of transcriptional regulatory genes with nine members described in humans. The majority of PAX2 pathogenic mutations are located in the paired domain (comprising a conserved 128 amino acid region) that has DNA binding properties encoded by exons 2-4 (Bower et al., 2012; Eccles et al., 2002). However, evidence from an international consortium of three laboratories collecting data on PAX2 mutations in RCS patients reported that there are no clear genotype/phenotype correlations, and variable types of PAX2 mutation (missense, frameshifts, splice sites, and deletions) located across 10 of the 12 PAX2 exons can lead to similar phenotypes, while the same mutation within members of the same family can have variable penetrance and manifestations of RCS (Bower et al., 2012). This large intrafamily variability in RCS suggests that factors other than PAX2 may play a role in clinical penetrance (Bower et al., 2012). PAX2 mutations are found in approximately 50% of RCS/PAPRS, thereby suggesting that other abnormalities of genes may be involved in the etiology of this disorder (Dureau et al., 2001; Okumura et al., 2015).

The presence of optic disc pits and dysplastic papilla in the family reported here (Figure 1a,e) is a distinguishing feature confirming RCS from FJHN given that CKD is common to both. This family also has reduced FEUA, hyperuricemia and gout that are commonly found in FJHN. Such occurrence of RCS with hyperuricemia and gout, has been previously reported in only two unrelated families (Megaw et al., 2013). One family, which had a PAX2 frameshift mutation [c.567_568dup (p. Ile190ArgfsX85)] in exon 5, consisted of five affected males from three generations; all the five affected males suffered from hyperuricemia and/or gout and the proband also suffered from diabetes mellitus and cryptorchidism, which have not previously been associated with RCS (Megaw et al., 2013). In the other family, a de novo heterozygous C-to-T transition (c.418C>T) in exon 4 of PAX2 that would result in a missense Arg140Trp mutation was identified in a 14.8 year old girl who presented with hyperuricemic gout, in association with renal disease and ophthalmic abnormalities consistent with RCS (Deng et al., 2019). These reports together with our findings of a PAX2 c.226G>C transversion in exon 3 that resulted in a missense Gly76Arg mutation in a kindred with hyper-uricemic nephropathy and features of RCS (Figure 1a-c), suggest that the association of gout with RCS may not be rare.

The identification of a PAX2 mutation in the family (Figure 1a-c) reported in this study and the subsequent revision of the diagnosis from FJHN to RCS will have important implications for improved patient care, both in terms of treatments for the features already manifested, and also for longer term monitoring of other RCS associated phenotypes that may develop in the future. Thus, the patients and their unaffected relatives in the family (Figure 1a-c) have been informed of the results from the genetic testing, and those having the mutation have been provided with details about the clinical manifestations and management of RCS, which includes: the likelihood of developing kidney failure and the necessity of having regular hospital appointments for assessments of renal function; the mode of inheritance; and the risks for their children inheriting the mutation and developing RCS. Equally important, the confirmation of the absence of the mutation in the unaffected family members (II.3, III.1, III.2, and III.4) will also alleviate concerns for these individuals over nonpenetrance of the disease and reduce the burden of monitoring since they are at greatly reduced risk of developing kidney disease.

WGS, which enables the detection of all classes of genetic change including SNV, CNV, translocations, and variants in noncoding regions that may confer a pathogenic effect, has become increasingly affordable in recent years and provides a method to aid diagnosis of complex diseases with genetic etiologies. Thus, we have demonstrated that WGS can improve diagnosis of inherited forms of hyperuricemia and kidney disease, which can be challenging to achieve by pathological and biochemical analysis alone.

Supplementary Material

Online Supplementary Methods
Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the members of HICF2 Whole Genome Sequencing and Analysis Consortium as listed in the Supporting Information. This work was supported by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) programme grants (G9825289) and (G1000467), Kidney Research UK (KRUK) studentship grant (ST4/2013), a Wellcome Trust Senior Clinical Investigator Award, a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)—Oxford Biomedical Research Centre Programme grant, the Wellcome Trust (203141/Z/16/Z) and Health Innovation Challenge Fund (R6-388/WT 100127), a parallel funding partnership between the Wellcome Trust and the Department of Health. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Wellcome Trust or the Department of Health. RVT is a Wellcome Trust Investigator and NIHR Senior Investigator.

Funding information

Kidney Research UK, Grant/Award Number: ST4/2013; Medical Research Council, Grant/Award Numbers: G1000467, G9825289; National Institute for Health Research, Grant/Award Numbers: 203141/Z/16/Z, R6-388/WT100127; Wellcome Trust, Grant/Award Number: Senior Clinical Investigator Award

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

Mark Stevenson: designed this study, acquired data, analyzed and interpreted data, wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Karl Lhotta: designed this study, acquired data, analyzed and interpreted data; Rajesh V. Thakker: designed this study, analyzed and interpreted data, wrote the first draft of the manuscript; Silvia Reichart: acquired data; Charlotte Philpott: acquired data; Kate E Lines: acquired data; Caroline M Gorvin: acquired data; OxClinWGS: provided bioinformatic analysis of WGS data; Alistair T. Pagnamenta: provided bioinformatic analysis of WGS data, analyzed and interpreted data; Jenny C. Taylor: provided bioinformatic analysis of WGS data, analyzed and interpreted data. All coauthors participated in the preparation of the manuscript by reading and commenting on the draft prior to submission.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Bleyer AJ, Kidd K, Zivna M, Kmoch S. Autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease. Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease. 2017;24:86–93. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2016.11.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bower M, Salomon R, Allanson J, Antignac C, Benedicenti F, Benetti E, et al. Heidet L. Update of PAX2 mutations in renal coloboma syndrome and establishment of a locus-specific database. Human Mutation. 2012;33:457–466. doi: 10.1002/humu.22020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Choi HK, Atkinson K, Karlson EW, Willett W, Curhan G. Purine-rich foods, dairy and protein intake, and the risk of gout in men. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2004;350:1093–1103. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clissold RL, Hamilton AJ, Hattersley AT, Ellard S, Bingham C. HNF1B-associated renal and extra-renal disease-an expanding clinical spectrum. Nature Reviews: Nephrology. 2015;11:102–112. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Dahan K, Devuyst O, Smaers M, Vertommen D, Loute G, Poux JM, et al. Pirson Y. A cluster of mutations in the UMOD gene causes familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy with abnormal expression of uromodulin. The Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2003;14:2883–2893. doi: 10.1097/01.Asn.0000092147.83480.B5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Dehghan A, Kottgen A, Yang Q, Hwang SJ, Kao WHL, Rivadeneira F, et al. Fox CS. Association of three genetic loci with uric acid concentration and risk of gout: A genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2008;372:1953–1961. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61343-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng HY, Zhang YQ, Xiao HJ, Yao Y, Liu XY, Su BG, et al. Ding J. Diverse phenotypes in children with PAX2-related disorder. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine. 2019;7:e701. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Devriendt K, Matthijs G, Van Damme B, Van Caesbroeck D, Eccles M, Vanrenterghem Y, et al. Leys A. Missense mutation and hexanucleotide duplication in the PAX2 gene in two unrelated families with renal-coloboma syndrome (MIM 120330) Human Genetics. 1998;103:149–153. doi: 10.1007/s004390050798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Devuyst O, Olinger E, Rampoldi L. Uromodulin: From physiology to rare and complex kidney disorders. Nature Reviews: Nephrology. 2017;13:525–544. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devuyst O, Olinger E, Weber S, Eckardt KU, Kmoch S, Rampoldi L, Bleyer AJ. Autosomal dominanttubulointerstitial kidney disease. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2019;5:60. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0109-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Doring A, Gieger C, Mehta D, Gohlke H, Prokisch H, Coassin S, et al. Meisinger C. SLC2A9 influences uric acid concentrations with pronounced sex-specific effects. Nature Genetics. 2008;40:430–436. doi: 10.1038/ng.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dureau P, Attie-Bitach T, Salomon R, Bettembourg O, Amiel J, Uteza Y, Dufier JL. Renal coloboma syndrome. Ophthalmology. 2001;108:1912–1916. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00722-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Eccles MR, He SJ, Legge M, Kumar R, Fox J, Zhou CM, et al. Tsai RWS. PAX genes in development and disease: The role of PAX2 in urogenital tract development. The International Journal of Developmental Biology. 2002;46:535–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Eckardt KU, Alper SL, Antignac C, Bleyer AJ, Chauveau D, Dahan K, et al. Devuyst O. Autosomal dominanttubulointerstitial kidney disease: Diagnosis, classification, and management-a KDIGO consensus report. Kidney International. 2015;88:676–683. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Johnson RJ, Nakagawa T, Jalal D, Sanchez-Lozada LG, Kang DH, Ritz E. Uric acid and chronic kidney disease: Which is chasing which? Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2013;28:2221–2228. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alfoldi J, Wang Q, et al. MacArthur DG. The mutational constrant spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581:434–443. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2308-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kolz M, Johnson T, Sanna S, Teumer A, Vitart V, Perola M, et al. Gieger C. Meta-analysis of 28,141 individuals identifies common variants within five new loci that influence uric acid concentrations. PLoS Genetics. 2009;5:e1000504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kottgen A, Albrecht E, Teumer A, Vitart V, Krumsiek J, Hundertmark C, et al. Consortium, M Genome-wide association analyses identify 18 new loci associated with serum urate concentrations. Nature Genetics. 2013;45:145–154. doi: 10.1038/ng.2500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kudo E, Kamatani N, Tezuka O, Taniguchi A, Yamanaka H, Yabe S, et al. Itakura A. Familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy: Detection of mutations in the uromodulin gene in five Japanese families. Kidney International. 2004;65:1589–1597. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee DH, Kim JK, Oh SE, Noh JW, Lee YK. A case of familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy with novel uromodulin gene mutation, a novel heterozygous missense mutation in Korea. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2010;25:1680–1682. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.11.1680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Li S, Sanna S, Maschio A, Busonero F, Usala G, Mulas A, et al. Nagaraja R. The GLUT9 gene is associated with serum uric acid levels in Sardinia and chianti cohorts. Plos Genetics. 2007;3:2156–2162. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin JL, Ho HH, Yu CC. Chelation therapy for patients with elevated body lead burden and progressive renal insufficiency-A randomized, controlled trial. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1999;130:7–13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-1-199901050-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Madariaga L, Moriniere V, Jeanpierre C, Bouvier R, Loget P, Martinovic J, et al. Heidet L. Severe prenatal renal anomalies associated with mutations in HNF1B or PAX2 genes. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2013;8:1179–1187. doi: 10.2215/Cjn.10221012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Megaw RD, Lampe A, Dhillon B, Yoshida S, Wright AF. Papillorenal syndrome in a family with unusual complications. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 2013;97:945–946. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Messerli FH, Frohlich ED, Dreslinski GR, Suarez DH, Aristimuno GG. Serum uric-acid in essential-hypertension-an indicator of renal vascular involvement. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1980;93:817–821. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-93-6-817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Okumura T, Furuichi K, Higashide T, Sakurai M, Hashimoto S, Shinozaki Y, et al. Wada T. Association of PAX2 and other genemutations with the clinical manifestations of renal Coloboma syndrome. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Partington MW, Hennen BKE. Lesch-Nyhan syndrome-self-destructive biting mental retardation neurological disorder and Hyperuricaemia. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 1967;9:563. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1967.tb02325.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Piret SE, Danoy P, Dahan K, Reed AAC, Pryce K, Wong W, et al. Thakker RV. Genome-wide study of familial juvenile hyper-uricaemic (gouty) nephropathy (FJHN) indicates a new locus, FJHN3, linked to chromosome 2p22.1-p21. Human Genetics. 2011;129:51–58. doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0897-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Quinones Galvan A, Natali A, Baldi S, Frascerra S, Sanna G, Ciociaro D, Ferrannini E. Effect of insulin on uric acid excretion in humans. The American Journal of Physiology. 1995;268:E1–E5. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.1995.268.1.E1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Rossanti R, Morisada N, Nozu K, Kamei K, Horinouchi T, Yamamura T, et al. Iijima K. Clinical and genetic variability of PAX2-related disorder in the Japanese population. Journal of Human Genetics. 2020;65:541–549. doi: 10.1038/s10038-020-0741-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanyanusin P, Schimmenti LA, Mcnoe LA, Ward TA, Pierpont MEM, Sullivan MJ, et al. Eccles MR. Mutation of the Pax2 gene in a family with optic-nerve Colobomas, renal anomalies and Vesicoureteral reflux. Nature Genetics. 1995;9:358–364. doi: 10.1038/ng0495-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sharon Y, Schlesinger N. Beyond joints: A review of ocular abnormalities in gout and hyperuricemia. Current Rheumatology Reports. 2016;18:37. doi: 10.1007/s11926-016-0586-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Simmonds HA, Cameron JS, Goldsmith DJ, Fairbanks LD, Raman GV. Familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy is not such a rare genetic metabolic purine disease in Britain. Nucleosides Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids. 2006;25:1071–1075. doi: 10.1080/15257770600891028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sperling O, Eilam G, Persky-Brosh S, Devries A. Accelerated erythrocyte 5-Phosphoribosyl-1-pyrophosphate synthesis-familial abnormality associated with excessive uric-acid production and gout. Biochemical Medicine and Metabolic Biology. 1972;6:310. doi: 10.1016/0006-2944(72)90017-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Stacey JM, Turner JJO, Harding B, Nesbit MA, Kotanko P, Lhotta Kn, et al. Thakker RV. Genetic mapping studies of familial juvenile hyperuricemic nephropathy on chromosome 16p11-p13. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2003;88:464–470. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Stiburkova B, Majewski J, Hodanova K. Familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy (FJHN): Linkage analysis in 15 families, physical and transcriptional characterization of the FJHN critical region on chromosome 16p11.2 and the analysis of seven candidate genes. European Journal of Human Genetics. 2002;11:145–154. doi: 10.1136/jmg.39.12.882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas R, Sanna-Cherchi S, Warady BA, Furth SL, Kaskel FJ, Gharavi AG. HNF1B and PAX2 mutations are a common cause of renal hypodysplasia in the CKiD cohort. Pediatric Nephrology. 2011;26:897–903. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-1826-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. van der Made CI, Hoorn EJ, de la Faille R, Karaaslan H, Knoers NVAM, Hoenderop JGJ, et al. de Baaij JHF. Hypomagnesemia as first clinical manifestation of ADTKD-HNF1B: A case series and literature review. American Journal of Nephrology. 2015;42:85–90. doi: 10.1159/000439286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Venkat-Raman G, Gast C, Marinaki A, Fairbanks L. From juvenile hyperuricaemia to dysfunctional uromodulin: An ongoing metamorphosis. Pediatric Nephrology. 2016;31:2035–2042. doi: 10.1007/s00467-015-3308-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Vitart V, Rudan I, Hayward C, Gray NK, Floyd J, Palmer CN, et al. Wright AF. SLC2A9 is a newly identified urate transporter influencing serum urate concentration, urate excretion and gout. Nature Genetics. 2008;40:437–442. doi: 10.1038/ng.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Vylet’al P, Kublova M, Kalbacova M, Hodanova K, Baresova V, Stiburkova B, et al. Kmoch S. Alterations of uromodulin biology: A common denominator of the genetically heterogeneous FJHN/MCKD syndrome. Kidney International. 2006;70:1155–1169. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Weber S, Moriniere V, Knuppel T, Charbit M, Dusek J, Ghiggeri GM, et al. Salomon R. Prevalence of mutations inrenal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: Results of the ESCAPE study. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2006;17:2864–2870. doi: 10.1681/Asn.2006030277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Williams SE, Reed AAC, Galvanovskis J, Antignac C, Goodship T, Karet FE, et al. Thakker RV. Uromodulin mutations causing familial juvenile hyperuricaemic nephropathy lead to protein maturation defects and retention in the endoplasmic reticulum. Human Molecular Genetics. 2009;18:2963–2974. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Yang QO, Kottgen A, Dehghan A, Smith AV, Glazer NL, Chen MH, et al. Coresh J. Multiple genetic loci influence serumurate levels and their relationship with gout and cardiovascular disease risk factors. Circulation-Cardiovascular Genetics. 2010;3:523–530. doi: 10.1161/Circgenetics.109.934455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Online Supplementary Methods
Supplementary Table 1
Supplementary Table 2

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

RESOURCES