Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jul 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Oct 1;85(2):165–173. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002412

Table 3. Factors Associated With Ever HIV Self-Testing in Women.

Ever HIV Self-Testing
N Row % (n) Unadjusted PD % (95% CI) P * Unadjusted PR (95% CI) P * Adjusted PR (95% CI) P *
Level 1: Age
   Age group
      16–19 yrs 209 46.4 (97) 4.9 (−2.7 to 12.5) <0.001 1.12 (0.93 to 1.33) <0.001
      20–24 yrs 268 50.0 (134) 6.8 (0.0 to 14.0) 1.15 (0.99 to 1.34)
      25–39 yrs 525 41.3 (217) 0.0 1.0
      40+ yrs 454 30.0 (136) −11.8 (−17.6 to −6.0) 0.71 (0.6 to 0.84)
Level 2a: sociodemographic factors Head of household
      No 1042 42.3 (441) 0.0 0.007 1.0 0.01 1.0 0.39
      Yes 414 34.5 (143) −7.4 (−12.8 to −2.0) 0.83 (0.72 to 0.96) 0.94 (0.8 to 1.09)
Married or living with partner
      No 488 32.8 (160) 0.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001 1.0 0.002
      Yes 968 43.8 (424) 10.9 (5.7 to 16.0) 1.31 (1.14 to 1.51) 1.26 (1.09 to 1.46)
Children
      No 196 37.8 (74) 0.0 0.65 1.0 0.59 1.0 0.01
      Yes 1260 40.5 (510) 1.6 (−5.3 to 8.5) 1.05 (0.87 to 1.28) 1.38 (1.08 to 1.76)
Level 2b: Socioeconomic factors Educational attainment
      None 334 30.5 (102) 0.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
      Primary 975 41.9 (409) 13.5 (8.0 to 19.0) 1.47 (1.24 to 1.75) 1.31 (1.09 to 1.57)
      Secondary or higher 147 49.7 (73) 25.2 (15.7 to 34.7) 1.99 (1.57 to 2.52) 1.66 (1.29 to 2.13)
Household wealth status
      Lowest 490 35.7 (175) 0.0 0.003 1.0 0.002 1.0 0.002
      Middle 477 39.8 (190) 4.0 (−1.9 to 9.9) 1.11 (0.94 to 1.3) 1.08 (0.92 to 1.26)
      Highest 489 44.8 (219) 10.6 (4.5 to 16.7) 1.31 (1.13 to 1.53) 1.3 (1.12 to 1.52)
Level 3a: Sexual behavior factors Condomless sex in the past 3 mo§
      No 469 31.1 (146) 0.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001 1.0 0.19
      Yes 608 45.9 (279) 12.6 (7.3 to 17.9) 1.38 (1.19 to 1.6) 1.21 (0.91 to 1.61)
Level 3b: Health behavior factors Self-rated health status
      Poor/fair 279 33.0 (92) 0.0 0.005 1.0 0.008 1.0 0.29
      Good 831 41.3 (343) 8.6 (2.4 to 14.8) 1.26 (1.05 to 1.51) 1.08 (0.9 to 1.29)
      Very good
   No. of HIV tests before the past 12 mo 345 42.9 (148) 11.8 (4.3 to 19.3) 1.37 (1.12 to 1.68) 1.17 (0.95 to 1.44)
      0 260 18.1 (47) 0.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
      1–2 418 39.2 (164) 18.9 (12.6 to 25.2) 2.13 (1.6 to 2.83) 2.03 (1.52 to 2.71)
      3–5 457 48.1 (220) 26.0 (19.6 to 32.4) 2.49 (1.89 to 3.29) 2.51 (1.89 to 3.34)
      6+ 228 48.7 (111) 27.3 (19.2 to 35.3) 2.57 (1.92 to 3.43) 2.59 (1.91 to 3.51)
   Household uptake of HIVST
      No 922 30.0 (277) 0.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001 1.0 <0.001
      Yes 534 57.5 (307) 24.4 (19.3 to 29.6) 1.79 (1.58 to 2.02) 1.77 (1.56 to 2.01)

The table presents PDs and PRs for each model. All models account for clustering using a cluster fixed effect. The adjusted set of models account for variables higher in the conceptual framework and associated with the outcome at P < 0.10 level. Models in Level 1 adjusted for cluster. Models in Level 2 adjusted for cluster and age. Models in Level 3 adjusted for cluster, sociodemographic variables, and socioeconomic variables.

*

P value for the Wald test.

The 25–39-year age group was used as the base category due to a higher HIV testing prevalence in this subgroup. Test for linear trend, P < 0.001.

Test for linear trend, P = 0.01.

§

Results of multiple imputation analysis presented. Complete case analysis, PD: 13.8 (8.3, 19.4), P < 0.001; PR: 1.44 (1.23–1.68), P < 0.001; adjusted PR: 1.24 (0.94 –1.64), P = 0.13.

Test for linear trend, P = 0.002.

PD, prevalence difference.