Table 2. Synthesis of intervention-specific impacts on health outcomes in primary and supporting evaluations.

A. Primary evaluations. B. Supporting evaluations.

		Communicable diseases	Nutritional deficiencies	Maternal & perinatal	Injuries	Non-communicable diseases	General mental health	General physical health	Quality of life	Mortality	Personal or neighborhood safety	Social capital
A. Primary evaluations
Single Interventions						Housing Interventions
	TECHO	(+) (+)
	Galiani et al., 2018								(+)(+)		NS
	Galiani et al., 2017								(+)
						Transportation Interventions
	Metrocable										(+)(+)
	Cerdá et al., 2012
	Street asphalting	NS NS			NS			NS	NS		NS NS
	Gonzalez-Navarro and Quintana-Domeque, 2016
	Gonzalez Navarro 2010
						Sanitation Interventions
	Water expansion Galiani 2007	NS(+)
Comprehensive Interventions	Programa HÃ!bitat	NS NS									(+)(+) NS	NS NS
	McIntosh et al., 2018
	Ordóñez Barba and Ruiz Ochoa, 2015
	Ordóñez Barba et al., 2013
	Vila Viva									NT
	Friche et al.,2015
	Favela-Barrio Soares 2005	NS		NS	NS						NS
	Slum upgrading Butala 2010	(+)
Each outcome measured at each time point within the evaluations included in the current review and the review by Turley et al. is represented by a mark in the table. Reference: (+) = significant health-promoting direction of effects;
NS= non-significant effect; NT = notsignificance tested.
Note: The Jakarta Kampung Improvement Programstudied in Taylor (1987) was not included as it only involved the assessment of poverty and no other health outcome or any other outcome in the pathway to health.

		Communicable diseases	Nutritional deficiencies	Maternal & perinatal	Injuries	Non-communicable diseases	General mental health	General physical health	Quality of life	Mortality	Personal or neighborhood safety	Social capital
B. Supporting evaluations
Single Interventions	Housing Interventions
	TECHO						(+)(+)(+)	(+) NS	(+)(+)			NS NS
	Simonelli et al., 2013						NS
	South African Housing	NS NS	NS			NS				NS NS
	Subsidy
	Marais and Cloete, 2014
	People’s Housing Program	NS			(+)		(+)	(+)NS				(+)
	Shortt and Hammett, 2013
	Piso Firme	NS(+)	NS(+)			(+)	NS	NS	(+)
	Cattaneo 2009
Comprehensive Interventions	Slum Improvement Program							(+)(+)(+)	(+)
	Parikh et al., 2015							NT
	Parikh et al., 2012
	Parikh in press
	Barrio Escopa project
	De Leon 1986											(+)
	Slum Improvement Program
	Moitra 1987							NT
	Small Towns Urban	NT
	Development Project
	Milone 1993
	Slum Improvement project		NS NT	NS NT				NT NT
	Abelson 1996
	Zonal Improvement Program	(+)
	Aiga 2002
	Multicomponent physical	NT NT NT
	upgrading
	Moraes 2004
Each outcome measured at each time point within the evaluations included in the current review and the review by Turley et al. is represented by a mark in the table. Reference: (+)= significant health-promoting direction of effects;
NS = non-significant effect; NT = not significance tested.
Note: The Slum Networking intervention measured by Joshi (2002) was not included as it only involved the assessment of poverty and no other health outcome or any other outcome in the pathway to health.