Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Dec 4;30(2):112–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.09.006

Table 2. Characteristics of participants according to capacity assessment.

Has capacity unanimously Disagreement on capacity Lacks capacity unanimously Significance (p)
N 24 (60.0%) 9 (22.5%) 7 (17.5%)
Mean age (median) 62.5 70.0 80.0 0.006
Gender (% males) 50.0 66.7 42.9 0.7
Ethnicity (% white) 91.7 100.0 71.4 0.16
% Living independently (including with family input) 87.5 77.8 42.8 0.05
Years of education (mean) 11.0 9.7 10.3 0.02
% with recurrent diagnosis, same presentation 62.5 22.2 14.3 0.03
% clinical team thought had capacity 100 88.9 71.4 0.03
% nearest relative thought had capacity 100 75.0 75.0 0.004
MMSE (median) 28.5 26.0 16.0 p<0.001