Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Sep 8.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Law Psychiatry. 2006 Dec 4;30(2):112–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.09.006

Table 3. Performances on MacCAT-T subtests.

Has capacity unanimously Disagreement on capacity Lacks capacity unanimously Significance (p)
MacCAT-T understanding summary rating (%)
  4   75.0 22.2   0
  3   25.0 11.1     0
  2     0 55.6 28.6
  1     0   0 42.9
  0     0 11.1 28.6
  ≥50% total score (%) 100 88.9 28.6 p<0.001
MacCAT-T appreciation summary rating (%)
  4   66.7 22.2   0
  3   25.0 33.3 14.3
  2     8.3 22.2 28.6
  1     0 22.2 14.3
  0     0   0 42.9
  ≥50% total score 100 77.8 42.9 p<0.001
MacCAT-T reasoning summary rating (%)
  8     0   0   0
  6–7   33.3 11.1   0
  4–5   50.0   0   0
  2–3   16.7 55.6 28.6
  0–1     0 33.3 71.4
  ≥50% total score   83.3 11.1   0 p<0.001
MacCAT-T expressing a choice
  2   90.9 66.7 28.6 p=0.002
  1     9.1 11.1 57.1
  0     0 22.2 14.3
  % with >50% score 100 77.8 85.7