Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 17.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Nanotechnol. 2021 Jun 17;16(9):1030–1038. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00928-x

Figure 2. Characterization of D1D2, LNPs and D1D2-targeted LNPs.

Figure 2

a. SDS PAGE of both the D1D2 (WT) and mD1D2 (MUT) proteins. Dimerization through disulfide bonds is evident when comparing to the lanes without reducing agent. Experiment was repeated 3 times independently. b. In vitro binding of the purified D1D2 protein to TK-1 cells measured by flow cytometry. mD1D2 does not bind the cells while the D1D2 binds only cells with HA integrin α4β7 (after addition of Mn2+). A significant difference between D1D2 and mD1D2 in Mn2+-activated cells was observed (p < 0.0001, n = 4 biologically independent samples, two-sided student’s t-test, data are presented as mean +/- SD). c. Representative transmission electron microscopy images of unconjugated LNPs and LNPs conjugated to RG7. Experiment was repeated 3 times independently. d. siRNA entrapment efficiency assayed by Ribogreen, n = 3 biologically independent samples. Data presented as mean +/- SD. e. Hydrodynamic size, polydispersity index (PDI) and zeta potential of the produced LNPs. f. In vitro binding of Cy5-labeled, D1D2-targeted LNPs to TK1 cells. g. Representative confocal images showing internalization of Cy5-labeled LNPs (magenta) into TK-1 cells. Images were generated by combining 11 frames from Z-stack imaging (0.3 μm/frame).