. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Oct 12.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Cell Biol. 2010 Nov 1;90(1):26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2010.09.008

Table 1. Effect of GM6001 treatment on cell dynamics and early matrix contraction.

	FBS		FBS+GM6001
	Dynamic index (nb cells analysed)	Gel contraction at day2 (%) (nb experiments)	Dynamic index (nb cells analysed)	Gel contraction at day2 (%) (nb number of experiments)
HTF7071	0.48±0.03 (22)	44±4 (4)	0.39±0.03 (19) ^* P=0.01	27±4 (4) ^* P= 0.006
HTF5003	0.42±0.03(21)	17±3 (4)	0.33±0.02 (28)^* P=0.005	5±3 (5) ^* P=0.01
HDF	0.40±0.02(24)	42±3 (4)	0.33±0.02 (18) ^* P=0.04	26±2 (4) ^* P<0.005
HSF	0.22±0.02 (7)	2.3±0.6 (4)	0.22±0.02 (6) NS	1.6±0.9 (3) NS
3T3	0.42±0.04 (7)	6±1 (8)	0.36±0.03 (8) NS	3±1 (3) ^* P=0.01

probability of a significant difference between the FBS and FBS+GM6001 sets using Student T test. NS, no significant difference.