Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Apr 7;94(7):2551–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-0159

Table 1. Biophysical properties of KATP channels.

Kir6.2ΔC Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-196) Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-288) Kir6.2 + SUR1
Po
   WT 0.03 ± 0.01 (n = 5) 0.67 ± 0.03 (n = 5) 0.58 ± 0.06 (n = 8) 0.24 ± 0.05 (n = 7)
   28Δ32 0.04 ± 0.01 (n = 5) 0.68 ± 0.03 (n = 5) 0.77 ± 0.04 a (n = 8) 0.80 ± 0.03 b (n = 5)
ATP IC50 (μM)
   WT 97 ± 2 (n = 7) 330 ± 20 (n = 6) 145 ± 23 (n = 5) 18 ± 2 (n = 6)
   28Δ32 162 ± 16 a (n = 7) 365 ± 88 (n = 5) 209 ± 25 (n = 5) 111 ± 37 b (n = 5)

n, Number of oocytes tested. IC50 for Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-196) and Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-288) were statistically significantly different from Kir6.2ΔC alone and from each other. There was no significant difference between the Po of Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-196) and Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-288), or between the Po of Kir6.2ΔC + SUR1(1-196) and Kir6.2ΔC 28Δ32 + SUR1(1-288).

a

P < 0.01 compared to wild-type.

b

P < 0.001 compared to wild-type.