Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 2.
Published in final edited form as: Paleobiology. 2021 Mar 24;47(4):574–590. doi: 10.1017/pab.2021.6

Table 2. Results of the pairwise comparison to test for differences in tooth shape between the examined groups. Signficance is depicted as p-value (an asterisk indicates a p-value < 0.05). d, distance; UCL, upper confidence limit; Z, Z-score.

  d UCL (95%) Z p
Genera Galeocerdo: Hemipristis 0.22105688 0.06072138 13.18929 0.001*
Galeocerdo: †Physogaleus 0.08449665 0.02238477 13.76419 0.001*
Hemipristis: †Physogaleus 0.18821240 0.06107171 11.02890 0.001*
Epochs Eocene: Oligocene 0.10098920 0.10209586    1.854888 0.055
Oligocene: Miocene 0.12911354 0.10152548    3.221054 0.007*
Miocene: Pliocene 0.04564208 0.02440129    5.873084 0.001*
Pliocene: Holocene 0.02514313 0.02663928    1.632904 0.068
Species G. clarkensis:G. eaglesomei 0.07441448 0.04510858    4.942268 0.001*
G. clarkensis:G. latidens 0.07202117 0.06429810    2.363137 0.023*
G. eaglesomei: †G. latidens 0.05405425 0.06630524    1.087175 0.124
G. aduncus: †G. rosaliaensis 0.07196333 0.03722257    6.309912 0.001*
G. aduncus: G. cuvier 0.04839204 0.02073741    7.789240 0.001*
G. aduncus: †G. mayumbensis 0.13711298 0.03392790 14.400205 0.001*
G. cuvier: †G. rosaliaensis 0.03718237 0.03594076    2.130237 0.042*
G. cuvier: †G. mayumbensis 0.13906022 0.03221319 15.260713 0.001*
G. mayumbensis: †G. rosaliaensis 0.15042923 0.04533909 11.932072 0.001*