Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biochem J. 2021 Sep 17;478(17):3319–3330. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210476

Table 1. SPR fitting parameters of the interaction of anti-AGT mAb with AGT, a 1 : 1 binding model was applied to fit the data.

AGT binding parameters
k on (M−1 s−1) k off (s−1) K d (nM)
Oxidised AGT 1121 ± 4 (1.78 ± 0.01) × 10−4 159 ± 1
Reduced AGT 1540 ± 6 (1.55 ± 0.01) × 10−4 103.1 ± 0.9
Independent Samples t-test (P-value) <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
t-value −107.89 32.53 83.10
Degrees of freedom 5 5 5
Individual measurements, oxidised AGT
Anti-AGT mAb surface kon (M−1 s−1) koff (s−1) Kd (nM)
Surface 1 1182 ± 4 (1.78 ± 0.01) × 10−4 150 ± 1
Surface 2 1153 ± 4 (1.73 ± 0.01) × 10−4 150 ± 1
Surface 3 1055 ± 4 (1.84 ± 0.01) × 10−4 174 ± 1
Surface 4 1093 ± 3 (1.77 ± 0.01) × 10−4 162 ± 1
Individual measurements, reduced AGT
Anti-AGT mAb surface kon (M−1 s−1) koff (s−1) Kd (nM)
Surface 1 1439 ± 6 (1.61 ± 1) × 10−4 112 ± 1
Surface 2 1534 ± 6 (1.49 ± 1) × 10−4 97.3 ± 0.9
Surface 3 1596 ± 6 (1.51 ± 1) × 10−4 94.8 ± 0.9
Surface 4 1473 ± 5 (1.59 ± 1) × 10−4 108.1 ± 0.8