Table 1. Summary of survey measures.
Survey domain | Description | Time 1 | Time 2 |
---|---|---|---|
Participant characteristics and personality traits | |||
Participant characteristics | Child age, parent/carer age, gender, education, number of children, ethnicity, religion and
religiosity, income |
✓ | X |
General anxiety | Generalised Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7). A seven-item measure for screening
and severity measuring generalised anxiety disorder. Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale 74 |
✓ | ✓ |
Resilience | Brief resilience scale. A six-item measure for assessing the ability to bounce back or
recover from stress. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale 81 . |
✓ | X |
Intolerance for
Uncertainty |
Short version of the Intolerance for Uncertainty scale. A 12-item measure for assessing
intolerance for uncertainty. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale 80 . |
✓ | X |
Attributes of informed decision-making | |||
Knowledge | Nine-item knowledge of genome sequencing (KOGS) measure that is context-neutral and
focuses on what is involved in having genome sequencing (including ‘what is a genome’), and the limitations and uncertainties of genome sequencing. Each statement is rated as either true, false or don’t know 71 . In addition, we will include a number of knowledge items developed specifically for the this study which relate to the way that the Service is being offered. |
✓ | X |
Attitude | Five-item scale examining general attitudes to genome sequencing e.g. harmful
– beneficial, unimportant – important, measured on a five-point Likert scale 18 . |
✓ | ✓ |
Self-reported informed
decision-making |
Question used previously in survey on genome sequencing in the 100,000 Genomes
Project 18 . |
✓ | X |
Decisional conflict | Sixteen-item measure with five-point Likert scale which assess decisional certainty or
conflict about a healthcare decision 73 |
✓ | X |
Decisional-regret | Five-item measure with five-point likert scale which assesses regret or remorse about a
healthcare decision, with scores ranging from 0 to 100. DRS scores can be defined into three categories: no decision regret (DRS score 0), mild decision regret (DRS score 1–25), and moderate to high decision regret (DRS score >25) 69 . |
X | ✓ |
Test results | Study specific question to assess what result the patient received (a diagnostic result, a no-
findings result or an uncertain result) |
X | ✓ |
Clinical, psychosocial and behavioural outcomes | |||
Parental empowerment | Genomics Outcome Scale: six-item questionnaire with five-point likert scale which captures
the theoretical construct of empowerment relating to genomic medicine 75 |
✓ | ✓ |
Health-related quality of
life (child) |
EQ-5D-Y (ages 4–15): Comprises five dimensions: mobility, looking after myself, doing usual
activities, having pain or discomfort and feeling worried, sad or unhappy. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems and a lot of problems. The caregiver (the proxy) is asked to rate the child’s/ adolescent’s health-related quality of life in their (the proxy’s) opinion 76 . |
✓ | ✓ |
Psychological impact | Adapted 12-item version of the Feelings About genomic Testing Results (FACToR) with five-
point Likert scale which measures the specific impact of result disclosure after genomic testing 78 |
X | ✓ |
Family impact | PEDS-QL Family impact module: sixteen-item questionnaire with five-point Likert Scale
which explores problems with communication, worry, daily activities, family relationships 77 |
✓ | ✓ |
Clinical, social and
behavioural impact of results |
Study specific questions which explore: changes to clinical management, understanding
the likely course of the condition, changes to child’s/parent’s lifestyle, connecting with specific rare disease support groups/other families, communication with medical professionals, reproductive decision-making and identification of other at-risk family members. Each item will have 5 levels (not at all – a great deal). |
X | ✓ |
Satisfaction with
appointment |
Seven-item patient-satisfaction measure for use in a clinical genetics setting 79 | ✓ | ✓ |