Table 5.
Overview of MUVR models and location of results within the manuscript 1.
| Comparison | Number of Samples | Figure Number |
|---|---|---|
| All samples (n = 97 in total; primary analyses) | ||
| MTA0 vs. CSM0 | Total, n = 54 CSM0, n = 26 MTA0, n = 28 |
Figure S1 |
| Caucasian vs. other ethnicities in MTA0 samples | Total, n = 28 Caucasian, n = 18 Other ethnicities, n = 10 |
Figure S2 |
| MTA0 vs. MTA6 | Total, n = 52 MTA0, n = 28 MTA6, n = 24 |
Figure S3 |
| CSM0 vs. CSM6 | Total, n = 45 CSM0, n = 26 CSM6, n = 19 |
Figure 4 |
| MTA6 vs. CSM6 | Total, n = 43 CSM6, n = 19 MTA6, n = 24 |
Figure 5 |
| Paired samples (n = 46 in total; sensitivity analyses) | ||
| MTA0 vs. MTA6 | Total, n = 24 MTA0, n = 12 MTA6, n = 12 |
Figure S4 |
| CSM0 vs. CSM6 | Total, n = 22 CSM0, n = 11 CSM6, n = 11 |
Figure S5 |
1 CSM, combined metabolic surgery plus medical therapy; CSM0, baseline samples from CSM group; CSM6, month 6 samples from CSM group; MTA, medical therapy alone; MTA0, baseline samples from MTA group; MTA6, month 6 samples from MTA group; MUVR, multivariate methods with unbiased variable selection in R.