Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 27;295:112817. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112817

Table 3.

Effect of intervention on improving consistent condom use with any type of male and female partners (past month), logistic generalised estimating equations (GEE) analyses (N=459 MSM)

Consistent condom use with any type of male partners Consistent condom use with any type of female partners
aOR 95% CI p value aOR 95% CI p value
Group
Intervention group .77 (3.05, 7.11) .29 .77 (.37, 1.59) .47
Comparison group (Ref.) 1 1
Time
Post-intervention assessment at 6th month 4.65 (3.05, 7.10) <.001 .38 (.16, .87) .02
Baseline 1 1
Group x Time
Intervention group x 6 months 6.04 (2.12, 17.21) <.001 5.01 (1.90, 13.23) <.001
Intervention group x Baseline 1 1
Comparison group x 6 months 1 1
Comparison group X Baseline 1 1
Intercept .001 (.001, .018) <.001 .03 (.001, 2.98) .13

Note. The models were adjusted for age, marital status, educational level, sexual identity, sex work involvement, baseline levels of consistent condom use, and relevant baseline scores (sexual and HIV-related stigma, condom use self-efficacy, HIV-related knowledge and psychosocial health conditions – problematic alcohol use, depression and internalised homonegativity)